Les conséquences psychologiques du COVID long. Effet des incertitudes, des stratégies de coping, du soutien social et de la qualité de vie sur la dépression

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Annales medico-psychologiques Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amp.2023.05.001
Sandrine Levent-Krauskopff, Myriam Guedj
{"title":"Les conséquences psychologiques du COVID long. Effet des incertitudes, des stratégies de coping, du soutien social et de la qualité de vie sur la dépression","authors":"Sandrine Levent-Krauskopff,&nbsp;Myriam Guedj","doi":"10.1016/j.amp.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Many people were infected by COVID-19 and for a minority of them, symptoms persisted beyond twenty days. These symptoms are multi-systemic, fluctuating, and impact the quality of life. Long COVID was first defined by patients themselves in the spring of 2020 to describe their recovery problems. Specifically, long COVID is defined as “a constellation of physical and mental symptoms which can persist or emerge afterwards, generating a multi-systemic and disabling syndrome, which varies from patient to patient and fluctuates over time”. The persistence of COVID symptoms, the decrease in the quality of life, the uncertainly about the future sometimes accompanied by a low level of social support perceived in the medical and personal entourage may have triggered the occurrence of a depressive disorder in patients with long COVID. The objective of this research was to study the effect of long COVID symptoms, of uncertainty and the impairment of quality of life on the development of depressive symptoms, while identifying the impact of moderating variables such as coping strategies and social support.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Two hundred and fourteen participants with long COVID (aged 18–68, M<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44, SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->11), including 93 % females (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->200) and 7% males (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->14), participated in this cross-sectional quantitative study between the months of April and June 2022. They described their symptoms and responded to five scales: the Evaluation of Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (EII), the Coping Strategies Checklist (WCC), the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item health survey (MOS SF-36), the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (QSSP), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>91% of the participants reported symptoms of fatigue (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->171), 52% a loss of concentration (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->111), 51% pain (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->110), 49 % trouble sleeping (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->104), and 41% memory problems (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->88). Compared with the general population, they presented a poorer quality of life, as well as high scores for anxiety, depression, and intolerance of uncertainty. Scores on coping strategies were also higher than the norms for the general population, and scores on satisfaction with social support were generally good. It was also found that the variables of intolerance of uncertainty, quality of life, and depression all correlated with each other. Furthermore, the regression analysis revealed predictors of depression. The areas of quality of life and emotional well-being (β<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->–0.41, t(199)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->–6.23, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) and fatigue/energy (β<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->–0.16, t(199)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->–2.83, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) were negative predictors of depression, as was the problem-focused coping score (β<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->–0.14, t(199)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->–2.84, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). Symptoms of the disorder related to concentration difficulties (β<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.27, t(199)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->5.16, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) and those impacting projects (β<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.18, t(199)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.31, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) were positive predictors of depression. The second finding of this study is that people treated specifically for their long COVID had significantly lower scores for anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty despite lower scores for certain dimensions of quality of life. The individuals who took part in our study also developed more problem-based coping strategies and reported more availability of and satisfaction with social support. Lastly, in terms of quality of life, the treated population expressed better mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study showed that, in addition to the effects of long COVID symptoms, quality of life, and coping strategies on the onset of symptoms of depression, the specific treatment of patients with long COVID seemed to constitute in itself a protective factor against depression and anxiety. It therefore would seem essential that any patient suffering from long COVID should receive multidisciplinary care specific to this pathology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7992,"journal":{"name":"Annales medico-psychologiques","volume":"182 6","pages":"Pages 497-503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales medico-psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448723001592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Many people were infected by COVID-19 and for a minority of them, symptoms persisted beyond twenty days. These symptoms are multi-systemic, fluctuating, and impact the quality of life. Long COVID was first defined by patients themselves in the spring of 2020 to describe their recovery problems. Specifically, long COVID is defined as “a constellation of physical and mental symptoms which can persist or emerge afterwards, generating a multi-systemic and disabling syndrome, which varies from patient to patient and fluctuates over time”. The persistence of COVID symptoms, the decrease in the quality of life, the uncertainly about the future sometimes accompanied by a low level of social support perceived in the medical and personal entourage may have triggered the occurrence of a depressive disorder in patients with long COVID. The objective of this research was to study the effect of long COVID symptoms, of uncertainty and the impairment of quality of life on the development of depressive symptoms, while identifying the impact of moderating variables such as coping strategies and social support.

Materials and methods

Two hundred and fourteen participants with long COVID (aged 18–68, M = 44, SD = 11), including 93 % females (n = 200) and 7% males (n = 14), participated in this cross-sectional quantitative study between the months of April and June 2022. They described their symptoms and responded to five scales: the Evaluation of Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (EII), the Coping Strategies Checklist (WCC), the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item health survey (MOS SF-36), the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (QSSP), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Results

91% of the participants reported symptoms of fatigue (n = 171), 52% a loss of concentration (n = 111), 51% pain (n = 110), 49 % trouble sleeping (n = 104), and 41% memory problems (n = 88). Compared with the general population, they presented a poorer quality of life, as well as high scores for anxiety, depression, and intolerance of uncertainty. Scores on coping strategies were also higher than the norms for the general population, and scores on satisfaction with social support were generally good. It was also found that the variables of intolerance of uncertainty, quality of life, and depression all correlated with each other. Furthermore, the regression analysis revealed predictors of depression. The areas of quality of life and emotional well-being (β = –0.41, t(199) = –6.23, P < 0.01) and fatigue/energy (β = –0.16, t(199) = –2.83, P < 0.01) were negative predictors of depression, as was the problem-focused coping score (β = –0.14, t(199) = –2.84, P < 0.05). Symptoms of the disorder related to concentration difficulties (β = 0.27, t(199) = 5.16, P < 0.01) and those impacting projects (β = 0.18, t(199) = 3.31, P < 0.01) were positive predictors of depression. The second finding of this study is that people treated specifically for their long COVID had significantly lower scores for anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty despite lower scores for certain dimensions of quality of life. The individuals who took part in our study also developed more problem-based coping strategies and reported more availability of and satisfaction with social support. Lastly, in terms of quality of life, the treated population expressed better mental health.

Conclusions

The study showed that, in addition to the effects of long COVID symptoms, quality of life, and coping strategies on the onset of symptoms of depression, the specific treatment of patients with long COVID seemed to constitute in itself a protective factor against depression and anxiety. It therefore would seem essential that any patient suffering from long COVID should receive multidisciplinary care specific to this pathology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期 COVID 的心理后果。不确定性、应对策略、社会支持和生活质量对抑郁症的影响
目标许多人感染了 COVID-19,其中少数人的症状持续超过二十天。这些症状涉及多个系统,起伏不定,影响生活质量。2020 年春,患者自己首次对长 COVID 进行了定义,以描述他们的康复问题。具体而言,长 COVID 被定义为 "一系列身体和精神症状,这些症状可能持续存在,也可能在之后出现,从而产生一种多系统和致残性综合征,这些症状因人而异,并随时间而波动"。COVID 症状的持续存在、生活质量的下降、对未来的不确定性,有时还伴随着医疗和个人随行人员所感受到的低水平社会支持,这些都可能引发长期 COVID 患者抑郁障碍的发生。本研究的目的是研究长期 COVID 症状、不确定性和生活质量受损对抑郁症状发展的影响,同时确定应对策略和社会支持等调节变量的影响。材料和方法214 名长期 COVID 患者(年龄在 18-68 岁之间,M = 44,SD = 11)在 2022 年 4 月至 6 月期间参加了这项横断面定量研究,其中包括 93% 的女性(n = 200)和 7% 的男性(n = 14)。他们描述了自己的症状,并回答了五个量表:不确定性不耐受评估量表(EII)、应对策略核对表(WCC)、医学结果研究简表 36 项健康调查(MOS SF-36)、感知社会支持问卷(QSSP)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。结果91%的参与者报告了疲劳症状(171 人),52%的参与者报告了注意力不集中(111 人),51%的参与者报告了疼痛(110 人),49%的参与者报告了睡眠障碍(104 人),41%的参与者报告了记忆问题(88 人)。与普通人群相比,他们的生活质量较差,焦虑、抑郁和不确定感得分较高。他们在应对策略方面的得分也高于普通人群,对社会支持的满意度得分普遍较高。研究还发现,对不确定性的不容忍度、生活质量和抑郁这些变量之间存在相互关联。此外,回归分析还揭示了抑郁症的预测因素。生活质量和情绪健康(β = -0.41,t(199) = -6.23,P <0.01)以及疲劳/精力(β = -0.16,t(199) = -2.83,P <0.01)是抑郁的负预测因子,问题应对得分(β = -0.14,t(199) = -2.84,P <0.05)也是如此。与集中注意力困难有关的失调症状(β = 0.27,t(199) = 5.16,P <;0.01)和影响项目的失调症状(β = 0.18,t(199) = 3.31,P <;0.01)是抑郁的积极预测因素。本研究的第二个发现是,因长期 COVID 而接受专门治疗的人,尽管在生活质量的某些方面得分较低,但其焦虑和对不确定性的不容忍度得分却明显较低。参与我们研究的人还发展出了更多基于问题的应对策略,并报告了更多的社会支持和对社会支持的满意度。最后,在生活质量方面,接受过治疗的人群表现出了更好的精神健康状况。结论 该研究表明,除了长 COVID 症状、生活质量和应对策略对抑郁症状的影响外,对长 COVID 患者的特殊治疗本身似乎也是抑郁和焦虑的保护因素。因此,任何患有长时COVID的患者都应接受针对这种病症的多学科治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales medico-psychologiques
Annales medico-psychologiques 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annales Médico-Psychologiques is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering the field of psychiatry. Articles are published in French or in English. The journal was established in 1843 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the Société Médico-Psychologique. The journal publishes 10 times a year original articles covering biological, genetic, psychological, forensic and cultural issues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, as well as peer reviewed articles that have been presented and discussed during meetings of the Société Médico-Psychologique.To report on the major currents of thought of contemporary psychiatry, and to publish clinical and biological research of international standard, these are the aims of the Annales Médico-Psychologiques.
期刊最新文献
Introduction editorial board Evaluating STC-1 and STC-2 mRNA expressions in Schizophrenia patients with increased oxidative stress Le délire est-il un récit ? Une approche narrative de la psychose Effect of taxifolin on clozapine-induced experimental oxidative and inflammatory heart damage in rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1