Micromycetes associated with wheat and their significance as pathogens in Russia

P. Gannibal, T. Gagkaeva, M. Gomzhina, E. Poluektova, E. Gultyaeva
{"title":"Micromycetes associated with wheat and their significance as pathogens in Russia","authors":"P. Gannibal, T. Gagkaeva, M. Gomzhina, E. Poluektova, E. Gultyaeva","doi":"10.31993/2308-6459-2022-105-4-15508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fungal diseases of wheat are widely studied due to economic importance at global scale. Nevertheless, incorrect \nnames of diseases and respective pathogen species, as well as inaccurate indication of their practical significance, is \nfound in in the scientific literature. This may lead to confusion and misinterpretation of the phytosanitary situation. This \nreview collects and structures the information about the main wheat diseases and pathogenic fungi causing them, as well \nas species emerging as a potential threat to wheat crops. The modern taxonomic status of the fungal species associated \nwith different organs of wheat is given, their geographical distribution and the impact on the crop yield are characterized. \nMicromycetes are divided into three groups according to their phytosanitary significance. The first group is represented \nby fungi possessing great importance as pathogens causing the 25 main wheat diseases. The second group includes three \ndiseases not found in Russia but significant for wheat production in other countries, thus posing potential risk for Russian \ngrain farming. The third group consists of fungi causing 29 minor and poorly studied diseases with unverified harmfulness \nand controversial significance, for which the available data needs to be reviewed and confirmed. This dataset can be used \nas a reference for a more accurate and correct description of the phytosanitary situation. The review will also be helpful for \nmore targeted studies using molecular methods to determine the area of fungi that cause wheat diseases, to track changes \nin their distribution boundaries and to clarify the harmfulness of poorly studied species.","PeriodicalId":20414,"journal":{"name":"PLANT PROTECTION NEWS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLANT PROTECTION NEWS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31993/2308-6459-2022-105-4-15508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fungal diseases of wheat are widely studied due to economic importance at global scale. Nevertheless, incorrect names of diseases and respective pathogen species, as well as inaccurate indication of their practical significance, is found in in the scientific literature. This may lead to confusion and misinterpretation of the phytosanitary situation. This review collects and structures the information about the main wheat diseases and pathogenic fungi causing them, as well as species emerging as a potential threat to wheat crops. The modern taxonomic status of the fungal species associated with different organs of wheat is given, their geographical distribution and the impact on the crop yield are characterized. Micromycetes are divided into three groups according to their phytosanitary significance. The first group is represented by fungi possessing great importance as pathogens causing the 25 main wheat diseases. The second group includes three diseases not found in Russia but significant for wheat production in other countries, thus posing potential risk for Russian grain farming. The third group consists of fungi causing 29 minor and poorly studied diseases with unverified harmfulness and controversial significance, for which the available data needs to be reviewed and confirmed. This dataset can be used as a reference for a more accurate and correct description of the phytosanitary situation. The review will also be helpful for more targeted studies using molecular methods to determine the area of fungi that cause wheat diseases, to track changes in their distribution boundaries and to clarify the harmfulness of poorly studied species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯小麦微菌及其病原意义
小麦真菌病害在全球范围内具有重要的经济意义,因此得到了广泛的研究。然而,在科学文献中发现了疾病和各自病原体种类的不正确名称以及对其实际意义的不准确指示。这可能导致对植物检疫情况的混淆和误解。本文收集和整理了小麦主要病害、致病真菌以及对小麦作物构成潜在威胁的新物种的相关信息。介绍了与小麦不同器官有关的真菌种类的现代分类学地位,分析了其地理分布及其对作物产量的影响。根据其植物检疫意义,将微菌类分为三类。第一类以真菌为代表,它们是引起小麦25种主要病害的重要病原体。第二类包括三种在俄罗斯没有发现但对其他国家的小麦生产有重大影响的疾病,因此对俄罗斯的粮食种植构成潜在风险。第三类真菌引起29种轻微的、研究较少的疾病,其危害性未经证实,意义有争议,需要对现有数据进行审查和确认。该数据集可作为更准确和正确描述植物检疫情况的参考。这一综述也将有助于利用分子方法进行更有针对性的研究,以确定引起小麦疾病的真菌的区域,跟踪其分布边界的变化,并澄清研究较少的物种的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of Trichogramma euproctidis efficacy against the key pest, European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Aegean region vineyards, Turkey The toxic effect of α-tomatine on the 28-spotted potato ladybeetle Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Susceptibility of Bombyx mori larvae to the microsporidium Nosema bombycis from the silkworm and Nosema sp. from the cotton bollworm Micromycetes associated with barley and their significance as pathogens in Russia The potential of plant antimicrobial peptides for crop protection against diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1