Antegrade and Retrograde Crossing of Chronic Total Occlusions Using the Outback Re-entry Device

T. Clark, A. Vance, M. Mantell, S. Reddy, C. Shackles
{"title":"Antegrade and Retrograde Crossing of Chronic Total Occlusions Using the Outback Re-entry Device","authors":"T. Clark, A. Vance, M. Mantell, S. Reddy, C. Shackles","doi":"10.25270/jcli/clig21-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The Outback device (Cordis) enables true lumen re-entry during subintimal recanalization of chronic total occlusions (CTOs). This study compared outcomes of patients who underwent subintimal recanalization of lower-extremity arterial CTOs utilizing the Outback device via antegrade and retrograde approaches. Methods. A retrospective analysis identified 39 patients with Rutherford 3 (n = 13), 4 (n = 13), and 5 disease (n = 13) where the Outback device was utilized (19 antegrade crossing femoropopliteal CTOs, 20 retrograde [17/20 transpedal access crossing femoropopliteal/tibioperoneal CTOs, 3/20 femoral access crossing iliac CTOs]) after conventional techniques failed. Mean age was 70.5 years and 67% were men. Most patients had multifocal and/or long-segment occlusions, with 41% having combined above- and below-knee disease. Results. Overall technical success was 90% (95% antegrade and 85% retrograde cohort; P=.15). There were no major complications and 4 minor complications (prolonged bleeding, femoral pseudoaneurysm requiring thrombin injection, and 2 small access-site hematomas). Fifteen percent of the retrograde cohort subsequently underwent distal bypass, compared with 0% in the antegrade cohort (P=.23). A single amputation occurred, in the antegrade group. Twelve-month target-vessel unassisted primary patency was higher with antegrade use (76% in the antegrade group vs 48% in the retrograde group; P=.03), but 12-month assisted primary patency was similar (85% in the antegrade group vs 79% in the retrograde group; P=.85). Conclusion. The Outback can be used safely and effectively from both antegrade and retrograde approaches during recanalization of CTOs. Lower target-vessel unassisted primary patency using the retrograde transpedal approach indicates the need for closer surveillance to achieve high rates of limb salvage.","PeriodicalId":73697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcli/clig21-00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The Outback device (Cordis) enables true lumen re-entry during subintimal recanalization of chronic total occlusions (CTOs). This study compared outcomes of patients who underwent subintimal recanalization of lower-extremity arterial CTOs utilizing the Outback device via antegrade and retrograde approaches. Methods. A retrospective analysis identified 39 patients with Rutherford 3 (n = 13), 4 (n = 13), and 5 disease (n = 13) where the Outback device was utilized (19 antegrade crossing femoropopliteal CTOs, 20 retrograde [17/20 transpedal access crossing femoropopliteal/tibioperoneal CTOs, 3/20 femoral access crossing iliac CTOs]) after conventional techniques failed. Mean age was 70.5 years and 67% were men. Most patients had multifocal and/or long-segment occlusions, with 41% having combined above- and below-knee disease. Results. Overall technical success was 90% (95% antegrade and 85% retrograde cohort; P=.15). There were no major complications and 4 minor complications (prolonged bleeding, femoral pseudoaneurysm requiring thrombin injection, and 2 small access-site hematomas). Fifteen percent of the retrograde cohort subsequently underwent distal bypass, compared with 0% in the antegrade cohort (P=.23). A single amputation occurred, in the antegrade group. Twelve-month target-vessel unassisted primary patency was higher with antegrade use (76% in the antegrade group vs 48% in the retrograde group; P=.03), but 12-month assisted primary patency was similar (85% in the antegrade group vs 79% in the retrograde group; P=.85). Conclusion. The Outback can be used safely and effectively from both antegrade and retrograde approaches during recanalization of CTOs. Lower target-vessel unassisted primary patency using the retrograde transpedal approach indicates the need for closer surveillance to achieve high rates of limb salvage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用内陆再入装置顺、逆行穿越慢性全闭塞
目的。Outback装置(Cordis)能够在慢性全闭塞(CTOs)的内膜下再通期间实现真正的管腔再入。本研究比较了使用Outback装置经顺行和逆行入路行下肢动脉CTOs内膜下再通的患者的结果。方法。回顾性分析发现39例Rutherford 3 (n = 13), 4 (n = 13)和5例(n = 13)患者在常规技术失败后使用了Outback装置(19例顺行穿过股腘动脉cto, 20例逆行[17/20经椎弓根通道穿过股腘/胫腓动脉cto, 3/20股动脉通道穿过髂动脉cto])。平均年龄70.5岁,67%为男性。大多数患者有多灶性和/或长节段闭塞,41%合并膝上下病变。结果。总体技术成功率为90%(95%顺行队列和85%逆行队列;P =酒精含量)。无重大并发症,轻微并发症4例(长时间出血,股假性动脉瘤需要注射凝血酶,2例小切口血肿)。15%的逆行组随后行远端搭桥,而在顺行组中为0% (P= 0.23)。顺行组发生单侧截肢。顺行组12个月无辅助靶血管初级通畅率高于逆行组(76% vs 48%);P=.03),但12个月辅助一期通畅率相似(顺行组85% vs逆行组79%;P = .85)。结论。在cto再通过程中,从顺行和逆行两种途径都可以安全有效地使用内陆。采用逆行椎弓根入路的低靶血管无辅助初级通畅表明需要更密切的监测以获得高的肢体保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy in Patients with Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes. Single-Center Experience With Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Directional Atherectomy System for Below-the-Knee Critical Limb Ischemia Optimizing Laser Atherectomy for Different Lesion Morphologies Use of the Ranger Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Short-Term Safety and Efficacy Results From Singapore Acute Occlusion of 14 Fr Femoral Access Site After Suture/Collagen Device Failure and Successful Transradial Recanalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1