Working through the first year of the pandemic: a snapshot of Australian school leaders’ work roles and responsibilities and health and wellbeing during covid-19

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational Administration and History Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00220620.2021.1975367
B. Arnold, M. Rahimi, Phillip F. Riley
{"title":"Working through the first year of the pandemic: a snapshot of Australian school leaders’ work roles and responsibilities and health and wellbeing during covid-19","authors":"B. Arnold, M. Rahimi, Phillip F. Riley","doi":"10.1080/00220620.2021.1975367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last 18 months, the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had dramatic implications for education systems across the globe. At the peak of the crisis, 1.6 billion students from over 190 countries were out of school and over 100 million school leaders, teachers and other personnel had to contend with a new world of work in which schools were closed (UNESCO 2021). In Australia, state and territory governments have worked in consultation with one another and the federal government to respond to outbreaks. Historically, the governance of schooling has been a site of conflict for these authorities. In responding to the pandemic, periods of federal-state cooperation have been disrupted by disputes as federal authorities have attempted to intervene in matters that are the constitutional responsibility of states. State-level policymakers have introduced the measures and policy directives that determine how schools operate during the pandemic. In the early phase of the pandemic, all State governments enforced the closure of school buildings. Since then, state governments have introduced restrictions in response to outbreaks within their jurisdictions. Some states experienced heavy and prolonged restrictions and lockdowns (e.g. Victoria and NSW) and schools were closed on multiple occasions during 2020 and 2021. In other states, such as WA and South Australia there have been relatively few school closures. However, the COVID conditions were a cause of stress for the school leaders across the country. At the school level, Australian principals and school leaders were responsible for dealing with the disruption brought about by the pandemic and ensuring that policy directives were effectively implemented. The new circumstances brought about by the pandemic presented school leaders with new challenges and in some cases radically transformed the school leadership role. Research in other countries and contexts has shown that school leaders had to make highly complex decisions; deal with increased workload; lead in the context of rapidly changing guidelines and circumstances; and provide support to school communities that were coping with severe illness and death (Beauchamp et al. 2021; OECD 2021). School leaders also had to rapidly develop new sills in order to lead the transition to online learning (Arar et al. 2021).","PeriodicalId":45468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Administration and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1975367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Over the last 18 months, the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had dramatic implications for education systems across the globe. At the peak of the crisis, 1.6 billion students from over 190 countries were out of school and over 100 million school leaders, teachers and other personnel had to contend with a new world of work in which schools were closed (UNESCO 2021). In Australia, state and territory governments have worked in consultation with one another and the federal government to respond to outbreaks. Historically, the governance of schooling has been a site of conflict for these authorities. In responding to the pandemic, periods of federal-state cooperation have been disrupted by disputes as federal authorities have attempted to intervene in matters that are the constitutional responsibility of states. State-level policymakers have introduced the measures and policy directives that determine how schools operate during the pandemic. In the early phase of the pandemic, all State governments enforced the closure of school buildings. Since then, state governments have introduced restrictions in response to outbreaks within their jurisdictions. Some states experienced heavy and prolonged restrictions and lockdowns (e.g. Victoria and NSW) and schools were closed on multiple occasions during 2020 and 2021. In other states, such as WA and South Australia there have been relatively few school closures. However, the COVID conditions were a cause of stress for the school leaders across the country. At the school level, Australian principals and school leaders were responsible for dealing with the disruption brought about by the pandemic and ensuring that policy directives were effectively implemented. The new circumstances brought about by the pandemic presented school leaders with new challenges and in some cases radically transformed the school leadership role. Research in other countries and contexts has shown that school leaders had to make highly complex decisions; deal with increased workload; lead in the context of rapidly changing guidelines and circumstances; and provide support to school communities that were coping with severe illness and death (Beauchamp et al. 2021; OECD 2021). School leaders also had to rapidly develop new sills in order to lead the transition to online learning (Arar et al. 2021).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大流行的第一年工作:2019冠状病毒病期间澳大利亚学校领导的工作角色和责任以及健康和福祉的快照
在过去的18个月里,2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对全球教育系统产生了巨大影响。在危机最严重的时候,来自190多个国家的16亿学生失学,1亿多学校领导、教师和其他工作人员不得不面对学校关闭的新世界(教科文组织,2021年)。在澳大利亚,州和地区政府相互协商,并与联邦政府协商,以应对疫情。从历史上看,学校的管理一直是这些当局冲突的地方。在应对这一流行病的过程中,由于联邦当局试图干预属于各州宪法责任的事项,联邦与州之间的合作时期因争端而中断。州一级的政策制定者已经出台了决定学校在大流行期间如何运作的措施和政策指令。在大流行的早期阶段,所有州政府都强制关闭了学校建筑。从那时起,各州政府为应对其管辖范围内的疫情采取了限制措施。一些州(如维多利亚州和新南威尔士州)经历了严重和长期的限制和封锁,学校在2020年和2021年期间多次关闭。在西澳和南澳大利亚等其他州,关闭的学校相对较少。然而,新冠肺炎疫情给全国各地的学校领导带来了压力。在学校一级,澳大利亚校长和学校领导负责处理大流行病带来的中断,并确保政策指示得到有效执行。大流行带来的新情况给学校领导带来了新的挑战,在某些情况下根本改变了学校的领导作用。在其他国家和背景下的研究表明,学校领导必须做出高度复杂的决定;处理增加的工作量;在指导方针和环境迅速变化的背景下发挥领导作用;并为应对严重疾病和死亡的学校社区提供支持(Beauchamp et al. 2021;经合组织2021)。学校领导也必须迅速发展新技能,以领导向在线学习的过渡(Arar等人,2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Administration and History
Journal of Educational Administration and History EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Ghana's basic education Headteacher leadership: critical discourse analysis of the Headteachers’ handbook Development of emotion regulation skills among new teachers in special education: the key role of educational leaders and colleagues Navigating power dynamics in elite interviews Beyond #MeToo in Iran: change through informal feminist educational leadership Critical school finance: special volume commentary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1