Virtual reality and immersive technologies to promote workplace wellbeing: a systematic review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2023.2182428
Simon Riches, Lawson Taylor, Priyanga Jeyarajaguru, Wim Veling, Lucia Valmaggia
{"title":"Virtual reality and immersive technologies to promote workplace wellbeing: a systematic review.","authors":"Simon Riches, Lawson Taylor, Priyanga Jeyarajaguru, Wim Veling, Lucia Valmaggia","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2023.2182428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work-related stress negatively impacts employee wellbeing. Stress-management interventions that reduce workplace stress can be challenging. Immersive technologies, such as virtual reality (VR), may provide an alternative.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of immersive technologies to promote workplace wellbeing (PROSPERO 268460).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Embase were searched until 22<sup>nd</sup> July 2021. Studies were included if they tested a workforce or were designed for a workplace. Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool (EPHPP) was used for quality ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 17 studies (<i>N</i> = 1270), published 2011-2021. Over half were conducted in Europe. Eight studies were controlled trials. Most studies involved brief, single sessions of immersive VR and provided evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness when measuring wellbeing-related variables such as stress, relaxation, and restoration. VR environments included relaxation tasks such as meditation or breathing exercises, and nature-based stimuli, such as forests, beaches, and water. Studies tested office workers, healthcare professionals, social workers, teachers, and military personnel. EPHPP ratings were \"strong\" (<i>N</i> = 1), \"moderate\" (<i>N</i> = 13), and \"weak\" (<i>N</i> = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VR relaxation appears helpful for workplaces. However, limited longer-term data, controlled trials, and naturalistic studies mean conclusions must be drawn cautiously.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"253-273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2182428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Work-related stress negatively impacts employee wellbeing. Stress-management interventions that reduce workplace stress can be challenging. Immersive technologies, such as virtual reality (VR), may provide an alternative.

Aims: This systematic review aimed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of immersive technologies to promote workplace wellbeing (PROSPERO 268460).

Methods: Databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Embase were searched until 22nd July 2021. Studies were included if they tested a workforce or were designed for a workplace. Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool (EPHPP) was used for quality ratings.

Results: There were 17 studies (N = 1270), published 2011-2021. Over half were conducted in Europe. Eight studies were controlled trials. Most studies involved brief, single sessions of immersive VR and provided evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness when measuring wellbeing-related variables such as stress, relaxation, and restoration. VR environments included relaxation tasks such as meditation or breathing exercises, and nature-based stimuli, such as forests, beaches, and water. Studies tested office workers, healthcare professionals, social workers, teachers, and military personnel. EPHPP ratings were "strong" (N = 1), "moderate" (N = 13), and "weak" (N = 3).

Conclusions: VR relaxation appears helpful for workplaces. However, limited longer-term data, controlled trials, and naturalistic studies mean conclusions must be drawn cautiously.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实和沉浸式技术促进工作场所健康:系统综述。
背景:与工作相关的压力会对员工的健康产生负面影响。减少工作压力的压力管理干预措施可能具有挑战性。目的:本系统综述旨在评估沉浸式技术在促进工作场所健康方面的可行性、可接受性和有效性(PROSPERO 268460):方法:检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science、PsycINFO 和 Embase 等数据库,检索截止日期为 2021 年 7 月 22 日。对劳动力进行测试或为工作场所设计的研究均被纳入。采用有效公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具(EPHPP)进行质量评级:共有 17 项研究(N = 1270),发表于 2011-2021 年。一半以上的研究在欧洲进行。八项研究为对照试验。大多数研究涉及沉浸式 VR 的简短、单次会话,在测量压力、放松和恢复等福祉相关变量时,提供了可行性、可接受性和有效性的证据。VR 环境包括冥想或呼吸练习等放松任务,以及森林、海滩和水等基于自然的刺激。研究测试了办公室工作人员、医疗保健专业人员、社会工作者、教师和军人。EPHPP评级为 "强"(1)、"中"(13)和 "弱"(3):结论:虚拟现实放松似乎对工作场所很有帮助。然而,由于长期数据、对照试验和自然研究有限,因此必须谨慎得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Starting well, staying well: randomised controlled trial of "Whitu - seven ways in seven days," a well-being app for university students. Does perceived social cohesion moderate the effect of parental stressors on depressive symptoms? A longitudinal, multi-level analysis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Selective and indicated UK school-based mental health interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Stigma perpetuation at the interface of mental health care: a review to compare patient and clinician perspectives of stigma and borderline personality disorder. Healthcare professional disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a rapid scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1