{"title":"Pirandello jako widz zawodowy","authors":"K. Woźniak","doi":"10.24917/20811853.17.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pirandello as professional spectatorAbstractLuigio Pirandello’s drama were unfailingly popular with Polish directors between the beginningof the 1960s until the 1970s. Native creators have undertaken dramas from differentperiods of the Nobelist’s output and covering various topics – bourgeois comedy to metatheatricalworks. Most probably those do not include all that were staged then.It appears that an increased interest in the author is to be connected with the 25th anniversaryof his death, as is suggested by Mieczysław Brahmer in the 1961 Tak jest, jak się państwu zdaje(directed by Zofia Wiercińska).The fact that both then and now critics and researchers in the majority of cases assumed, notnecessarily consciously, they are writing about an artist that is mainly a writer and only thena critic of stage productions of his dramas and a stage producer for his own texts is significant.As a consequence they focused mainly on deconstructing the “pirandellism” condemned byBrahmer, in particular on its canonical interpretation by Adrian Tilgher. Therefore, the followingquestion comes to mind: what kind of interpretations are possible when Pirandello’sworks (especially the first part of the so-called trilogy of “theatre in a theatre” which consistsof Six Characters in Search of an Author, Each In His Own Way and Tonight We Improvise) areconsidered from the perspective of purpose, that is individual theatrical activity of Pirandelloas a co-founder, principal and stage producer of Teatro D’Arte in Rome (in operation between1924 and 1928). The present article attempts at showing the possible direction of a search foran answer to said question with the starting point being the 1962 production of Sześć postaciscenicznych w poszukiwaniu autora (Six Characters in Search of an Author) directed by MariaWiercińska in Stefan Jaracz Theatre in Łódź.Keywords: Pirandello in Poland, Maria Wiercińska, first theatre directors in Italy","PeriodicalId":34769,"journal":{"name":"Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Historicolitteraria","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Historicolitteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20811853.17.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pirandello as professional spectatorAbstractLuigio Pirandello’s drama were unfailingly popular with Polish directors between the beginningof the 1960s until the 1970s. Native creators have undertaken dramas from differentperiods of the Nobelist’s output and covering various topics – bourgeois comedy to metatheatricalworks. Most probably those do not include all that were staged then.It appears that an increased interest in the author is to be connected with the 25th anniversaryof his death, as is suggested by Mieczysław Brahmer in the 1961 Tak jest, jak się państwu zdaje(directed by Zofia Wiercińska).The fact that both then and now critics and researchers in the majority of cases assumed, notnecessarily consciously, they are writing about an artist that is mainly a writer and only thena critic of stage productions of his dramas and a stage producer for his own texts is significant.As a consequence they focused mainly on deconstructing the “pirandellism” condemned byBrahmer, in particular on its canonical interpretation by Adrian Tilgher. Therefore, the followingquestion comes to mind: what kind of interpretations are possible when Pirandello’sworks (especially the first part of the so-called trilogy of “theatre in a theatre” which consistsof Six Characters in Search of an Author, Each In His Own Way and Tonight We Improvise) areconsidered from the perspective of purpose, that is individual theatrical activity of Pirandelloas a co-founder, principal and stage producer of Teatro D’Arte in Rome (in operation between1924 and 1928). The present article attempts at showing the possible direction of a search foran answer to said question with the starting point being the 1962 production of Sześć postaciscenicznych w poszukiwaniu autora (Six Characters in Search of an Author) directed by MariaWiercińska in Stefan Jaracz Theatre in Łódź.Keywords: Pirandello in Poland, Maria Wiercińska, first theatre directors in Italy
摘要从20世纪60年代初到70年代,路易吉奥·皮兰德罗的戏剧一直受到波兰导演的欢迎。本土创作者承继了这位诺贝尔奖得主不同时期的戏剧作品,涵盖了从资产阶级喜剧到元戏剧作品的各种主题。这些很可能不包括当时上演的一切。正如Mieczysław Brahmer在1961年的Tak jest, jak siwa państwu zdaje(由Zofia Wiercińska导演)中所暗示的那样,人们对作者的兴趣似乎与他去世25周年有关。在大多数情况下,无论是当时还是现在,评论家和研究人员都认为(不一定是有意识地),他们所写的艺术家主要是作家,只是当时对自己戏剧的舞台作品进行评论,对自己的文本进行舞台制作,这一事实具有重要意义。因此,他们主要集中于解构婆罗门所谴责的“pirandellism”,特别是阿德里安·蒂尔格(Adrian Tilgher)对其的规范解释。因此,下面的问题就出现了:从目的的角度来看皮兰德娄的作品(特别是所谓的“剧院中的戏剧”三部曲的第一部分,包括六个寻找作者的人物,每个人都以自己的方式和今晚我们即兴表演),即皮兰德娄作为罗马艺术剧院(1924年至1928年运营)的联合创始人,首席和舞台制作人的个人戏剧活动,可能会有什么样的解释?本文试图展示寻找上述问题答案的可能方向,起点是1962年由MariaWiercińska在Łódź的Stefan Jaracz剧院执导的Sześć postaciscenicznych w poszukiwaniu autora(六个寻找作者的人物)。关键词:波兰皮兰德娄,玛丽亚Wiercińska,意大利第一批戏剧导演