The Interior Other

Kate O'Connor
{"title":"The Interior Other","authors":"Kate O'Connor","doi":"10.29173/spectrum183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Representations of monstrosity in literature reveal the cultural tensions of specific historical periods, as collective social fears become embodied by creatures intended to disturb their audiences. Gothic novels of the late Victorian Era rely on these representations of darkness in society, and the different monsters created by Victorian authors reflect various views of social norms, particularly in relation to gender. This essay focuses on Bram Stoker’s sexually threatening vampires in Dracula and Robert Louis Stevenson’s physically repulsive representation of the duality of humankind in The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Portrayals of monsters in the late nineteenth century were not limited to literature, but also evident in visual works, such as Aubrey Beardsley’s renderings of Salomé for Oscar Wilde’s publication of a play by the same name. While Stoker’s engagement with monstrosity villainizes female sexual subjectivity, Stevenson’s depiction of corruption questions socially performative masculinity. An analysis of Beardsley’s images emphasizes the potential for sexually subjective female monsters like those in Dracula to contradict social gender norms much like Stevenson’s representation of Mr Hyde, rather than perpetuate the sexual repression of women as Stoker’s novel does. However, the exoticized nature of these drawings also highlights the association between imperial ideologies and representations of gendered monstrosity which both Stoker and Stevenson exhibit as they express anxieties about the colonial other in their texts. Studying these works allows insight into the connections between gender, sexual normativity, and the colonial other that continue to be relevant in contemporary media.","PeriodicalId":79731,"journal":{"name":"Spectrum (Lexington, Ky.)","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectrum (Lexington, Ky.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/spectrum183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Representations of monstrosity in literature reveal the cultural tensions of specific historical periods, as collective social fears become embodied by creatures intended to disturb their audiences. Gothic novels of the late Victorian Era rely on these representations of darkness in society, and the different monsters created by Victorian authors reflect various views of social norms, particularly in relation to gender. This essay focuses on Bram Stoker’s sexually threatening vampires in Dracula and Robert Louis Stevenson’s physically repulsive representation of the duality of humankind in The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Portrayals of monsters in the late nineteenth century were not limited to literature, but also evident in visual works, such as Aubrey Beardsley’s renderings of Salomé for Oscar Wilde’s publication of a play by the same name. While Stoker’s engagement with monstrosity villainizes female sexual subjectivity, Stevenson’s depiction of corruption questions socially performative masculinity. An analysis of Beardsley’s images emphasizes the potential for sexually subjective female monsters like those in Dracula to contradict social gender norms much like Stevenson’s representation of Mr Hyde, rather than perpetuate the sexual repression of women as Stoker’s novel does. However, the exoticized nature of these drawings also highlights the association between imperial ideologies and representations of gendered monstrosity which both Stoker and Stevenson exhibit as they express anxieties about the colonial other in their texts. Studying these works allows insight into the connections between gender, sexual normativity, and the colonial other that continue to be relevant in contemporary media.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部其他
文学中对怪物的表现揭示了特定历史时期的文化紧张,因为集体的社会恐惧被旨在扰乱其受众的生物所体现。维多利亚时代晚期的哥特小说依赖于这些社会黑暗的表现,维多利亚时代作家创造的不同怪物反映了社会规范的不同观点,特别是与性别有关的观点。本文的重点是布拉姆·斯托克在《德古拉》中描写的具有性威胁的吸血鬼,以及罗伯特·路易斯·史蒂文森在《化身博士》中对人类二元性的令人厌恶的表现。在19世纪晚期,对怪物的描绘不仅限于文学作品,而且在视觉作品中也很明显,比如奥布里·比尔兹利为奥斯卡·王尔德出版的同名戏剧《萨罗米斯》所做的渲染。斯托克对怪物性的描写使女性的性主体性变得邪恶,而史蒂文森对腐败的描写则质疑了社会上表现出来的男子气概。对比尔兹利作品形象的分析强调,像《德古拉》中那样,女性怪物在性方面是主观的,有可能与社会性别规范相矛盾,就像史蒂文森对海德先生的描述一样,而不是像斯托克的小说那样,使女性的性压抑永续下去。然而,这些绘画的异国情调也突出了帝国意识形态和性别怪物的表现之间的联系,斯托克和史蒂文森在他们的文本中表达了对殖民他人的焦虑。研究这些作品可以洞察性别、性规范和殖民他者之间的联系,这些联系在当代媒体中仍然相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Force-Feeding: Consumption and Sexuality in Frank G. Paci's Black Madonna Women, Role Failure, and the Nuclear Family in Stephen King’s The Shining The Interior Other Syrian Refugees’ Stability and Opportunity in Canada and Implications on Mental Health The Torontoic Dialogues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1