"Sensory in-Service": An Exploratory Evaluation of a Group-Based, Caregiver Intervention for Children with Sensory Processing Difficulties.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/01942638.2022.2104151

Keith Heyburn, Deb Shaw, Kayla Carbert, Sandy Thompson-Hodgetts

{"title":"\"Sensory in-Service\": An Exploratory Evaluation of a Group-Based, Caregiver Intervention for Children with Sensory Processing Difficulties.","authors":"Keith Heyburn, Deb Shaw, Kayla Carbert, Sandy Thompson-Hodgetts","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2022.2104151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To describe and evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based, caregiver education intervention on: (1) functional concerns for children with identified sensory processing difficulties, (2) caregiver knowledge of sensory processing and strategies to support their child, and (3) resources required.Methods: Ninety-five caregivers of children referred to therapy because of sensory processing difficulties [72% male, mean age (SD) = 6.0 (2.3) years] participated in a structured, two-hour, group-based, caregiver education intervention, which included didactic information, group discussion, worksheets, and written resources. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) performance and satisfaction scores evaluated changes in child function. A Caregiver Knowledge Questionnaire evaluated changes in caregivers' knowledge of sensory processing and strategies. Resources required were based on the total number of hours required for 1:1 versus group-based intervention.Results: Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were found for COPM performance (W = 108, p < .001; EF = 0.95) and satisfaction scores (W = 119.5, p < .001; EF = 0.94) and caregiver knowledge (W = 0.00, p<.001; EF = 1.00). Group-based intervention used 62% less time than 1:1 intervention.Conclusions: Group-based, caregiver education can be an effective way for therapists to meet demand and improve caregiver self-efficacy related to sensory processing difficulties.","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":"43 2","pages":"228-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2104151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To describe and evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based, caregiver education intervention on: (1) functional concerns for children with identified sensory processing difficulties, (2) caregiver knowledge of sensory processing and strategies to support their child, and (3) resources required.

Methods: Ninety-five caregivers of children referred to therapy because of sensory processing difficulties [72% male, mean age (SD) = 6.0 (2.3) years] participated in a structured, two-hour, group-based, caregiver education intervention, which included didactic information, group discussion, worksheets, and written resources. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) performance and satisfaction scores evaluated changes in child function. A Caregiver Knowledge Questionnaire evaluated changes in caregivers' knowledge of sensory processing and strategies. Resources required were based on the total number of hours required for 1:1 versus group-based intervention.

Results: Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were found for COPM performance (W = 108, p < .001; EF = 0.95) and satisfaction scores (W = 119.5, p < .001; EF = 0.94) and caregiver knowledge (W = 0.00, p<.001; EF = 1.00). Group-based intervention used 62% less time than 1:1 intervention.

Conclusions: Group-based, caregiver education can be an effective way for therapists to meet demand and improve caregiver self-efficacy related to sensory processing difficulties.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

“在职感觉”:以群体为基础的照顾者干预对感觉加工困难儿童的探索性评价。

目的:描述和评估基于群体的照顾者教育干预的有效性:(1)对识别出的感觉处理困难儿童的功能问题，(2)照顾者对感觉处理的知识和支持孩子的策略，以及(3)所需的资源。方法:95名因感觉处理困难而接受治疗的儿童的照顾者[72%为男性，平均年龄(SD) = 6.0(2.3)岁]参加了一个结构化的、两小时的、以小组为基础的照顾者教育干预，包括教学信息、小组讨论、工作表和书面资源。加拿大职业绩效测量(COPM)绩效和满意度评分评估儿童功能的变化。照护者知识问卷评估照护者感觉加工知识和策略的变化。所需资源基于1:1干预与基于组干预的总小时数。结果:两组患者的COPM性能均有显著改善(W = 108, p < 0.001;EF = 0.95)和满意度评分(W = 119.5, p < 0.001;EF = 0.94)和照顾者知识(W = 0.00, p)。结论:以群体为基础的照顾者教育是治疗师满足需求、提高照顾者感觉加工困难自我效能感的有效途径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

IF 1.5 4区医学Journal of Emergency MedicinePub Date : 2010-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.11.019

Akpofure Peter Ekeh MD, MPH, FACS, Mbaga Walusimbi MD, FACS, Erin Brigham MPH, Randy J. Woods MD, FACS, Mary C. McCarthy MD, FACS

Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population.

IF 0 Jornal Vascular BrasileiroPub Date : 2020-08-31 DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.190060

Mateus Picada Corrêa, Guilherme Soldatelli Kurtz, Larissa Bianchini, Lauren Copatti, Marcelo Ribeiro, Jaber Nashat Saleh, Rafael Stevan Noel, Julio Cesar Bajerski

Incidental findings in brain computed tomography scans of 3000 head trauma patients

IF 0 Surgical NeurologyPub Date : 2005-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.07.049

Hossein Eskandary MD , Mohammad Sabba MD , Foruzandeh Khajehpour MD , Mohammad Eskandari MD

来源期刊

Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-REHABILITATION

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine