Andean bear diet near to and far from a road

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY Ursus Pub Date : 2020-07-22 DOI:10.2192/URSUS-D-19-0003.1
Lucero M Hernani-Lineros, E. García, L. F. Pacheco
{"title":"Andean bear diet near to and far from a road","authors":"Lucero M Hernani-Lineros, E. García, L. F. Pacheco","doi":"10.2192/URSUS-D-19-0003.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Despite the existence of several regional studies on the diet of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus), there is a lack of information about the effects of human disturbances on this species' foraging ecology. Our main goal was to compare Andean bear diet composition between a disturbed area (DA) close to a paved road versus an undisturbed area (UA) far away from it, within the Parque Nacional y Área Natural de Manejo Integrado Cotapata, Bolivia. We collected 120 feces samples between October and November 2014—60 samples from each area. We identified 13 species from the feces collected at UA, whereas we identified only 7 species from the feces at DA. Mean number of identified food items per fecal sample at UA was 2.90 (SD = 0.86) and significantly greater (t = –4.32, = 118 df, P < 0.001) than DA mean 1.95 (SD = 1.43). Levin's index points to a specialist diet for Andean bears at both areas, but niche breadth at the UA (0.083) was almost twice the value at DA (0.043). Almost half of the items were found at both the UA and the DA (Jaccard's index = 0.538). Simpson's Diversity index ([UA] = 0.310, [DA] = 0.167) shows that Andean bear diet at the UA was also more equitable, as well as less dominated by a single item (Inverse Simpson index N [DA] = 3.229, N [UA] = 5.997). These results suggest that the presence of a road may affect Andean bear foraging ecology.","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":"24 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-19-0003.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract: Despite the existence of several regional studies on the diet of the Andean bear (Tremarctos ornatus), there is a lack of information about the effects of human disturbances on this species' foraging ecology. Our main goal was to compare Andean bear diet composition between a disturbed area (DA) close to a paved road versus an undisturbed area (UA) far away from it, within the Parque Nacional y Área Natural de Manejo Integrado Cotapata, Bolivia. We collected 120 feces samples between October and November 2014—60 samples from each area. We identified 13 species from the feces collected at UA, whereas we identified only 7 species from the feces at DA. Mean number of identified food items per fecal sample at UA was 2.90 (SD = 0.86) and significantly greater (t = –4.32, = 118 df, P < 0.001) than DA mean 1.95 (SD = 1.43). Levin's index points to a specialist diet for Andean bears at both areas, but niche breadth at the UA (0.083) was almost twice the value at DA (0.043). Almost half of the items were found at both the UA and the DA (Jaccard's index = 0.538). Simpson's Diversity index ([UA] = 0.310, [DA] = 0.167) shows that Andean bear diet at the UA was also more equitable, as well as less dominated by a single item (Inverse Simpson index N [DA] = 3.229, N [UA] = 5.997). These results suggest that the presence of a road may affect Andean bear foraging ecology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安第斯熊在公路附近和远处觅食
摘要/ Abstract摘要:尽管对安第斯熊(Tremarctos ornatus)的饮食进行了一些区域性研究,但人类干扰对该物种觅食生态的影响尚缺乏相关信息。我们的主要目标是比较玻利维亚国家公园Área Natural de Manejo Integrado Cotapata内靠近铺砌道路的受干扰区域(DA)与远离铺砌道路的未受干扰区域(UA)之间安第斯熊的饮食组成。2014年10月至11月,我们收集了120份粪便样本,每个地区60份。从UA收集的粪便中鉴定出13种,而从DA收集的粪便中仅鉴定出7种。在UA时,每个粪便样本中鉴定出的食物的平均数量为2.90 (SD = 0.86),显著高于DA平均值1.95 (SD = 1.43) (t = -4.32, = 118 df, P < 0.001)。莱文的指数指出,这两个地区的安第斯熊都有专门的饮食,但生态位宽度在UA(0.083)几乎是DA(0.043)的两倍。几乎一半的项目在UA和DA都被发现(Jaccard指数= 0.538)。辛普森多样性指数([UA] = 0.310, [DA] = 0.167)表明,安第斯熊在UA处的饮食也更公平,而且单一项目的主导程度更低(逆辛普森指数N [DA] = 3.229, N [UA] = 5.997)。这些结果表明,道路的存在可能会影响安第斯熊的觅食生态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ursus
Ursus 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.
期刊最新文献
Brown bear food habits in natural and human-modified landscapes in West-European Russia Escaping heat and anthropogenic pressures? Asiatic black bear denning behavior in its westernmost global range Interactions between brown bear cubs of different mothers in Kashmir, India Social network analysis uncovers hidden social complexity in giant pandas Survey on gastro-intestinal parasites of captive sun bears in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1