Prefered shannels for health information depending on health status

Q4 Social Sciences Social Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.14748/SM.V27I3.7567
T. Karanesheva, N. Danova, I. Yaneva
{"title":"Prefered shannels for health information depending on health status","authors":"T. Karanesheva, N. Danova, I. Yaneva","doi":"10.14748/SM.V27I3.7567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In a rapidly changing communication environment study of the communication preferences of different audience segments allows the selection of channels for health information to be tailored to the needs and characteristics of the audience. The purpose of the study is research the channels preferred for health information depending on the health status. Material and methods: A direct individual anonymous questionnaire was used, with a questionnaire on paper. The preferred channels for health information among 2979 persons over 20 years of age, from the 28 districts of the country, depending on their health status, were studied. The main statistical methods are: descriptive analysis, graphical analysis; variation analysis, Z-test to establish a significant difference. The results show significant differences in the choice of sources of health information between people with disease and people without disease. Physicians are the most commonly preferred health information channel, with a statistically significant difference depending on the health status (p<0,001). The Internet is twice as often preferred for health information by healthy people than by people with a disease (p<0.001). Television is a major channel for health information for people with a specific disease or medical problem, while healthy respondents more frequently prefer the Internet.","PeriodicalId":38881,"journal":{"name":"Social Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/SM.V27I3.7567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In a rapidly changing communication environment study of the communication preferences of different audience segments allows the selection of channels for health information to be tailored to the needs and characteristics of the audience. The purpose of the study is research the channels preferred for health information depending on the health status. Material and methods: A direct individual anonymous questionnaire was used, with a questionnaire on paper. The preferred channels for health information among 2979 persons over 20 years of age, from the 28 districts of the country, depending on their health status, were studied. The main statistical methods are: descriptive analysis, graphical analysis; variation analysis, Z-test to establish a significant difference. The results show significant differences in the choice of sources of health information between people with disease and people without disease. Physicians are the most commonly preferred health information channel, with a statistically significant difference depending on the health status (p<0,001). The Internet is twice as often preferred for health information by healthy people than by people with a disease (p<0.001). Television is a major channel for health information for people with a specific disease or medical problem, while healthy respondents more frequently prefer the Internet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据健康状态显示健康信息的首选通道
背景:在快速变化的传播环境中,研究不同受众群体的传播偏好,可以根据受众的需求和特点选择健康信息的渠道。本研究的目的是研究健康状况对健康信息的偏好渠道。材料与方法:采用直接的个人匿名调查问卷,纸上问卷。对来自全国28个县的2979名20岁以上的人根据其健康状况选择的健康信息渠道进行了研究。主要的统计方法有:描述性分析、图形化分析;方差分析,z检验建立显著差异。结果显示,患病人群和未患病人群在选择健康信息来源方面存在显著差异。医生是最常用的健康信息渠道,根据健康状况不同,差异有统计学意义(p< 0.001)。健康人群对互联网健康信息的偏好是患病人群的两倍(p<0.001)。对于患有特定疾病或医疗问题的人来说,电视是获取健康信息的主要渠道,而健康的受访者往往更喜欢互联网。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Medicine
Social Medicine Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicina Social es un foro académico internacional con acceso abierto y revisión por pares destinado a la promoción y el desarrollo de la Medicina Social. La revista se escribe con la inventiva y la visión crítica y comprometida que animó a los fundadores de la Medicina Social. Para lograr esto: 1. Actuamos como foro de investigación y docencia respecto a las formas en las que los factores sociales no sólo influyen sobre la salud y la enfermedad sino que a su vez son modificados por las mismas. 2. Apoyamos los objetivos de Salud para Todos de Alma Ata y la visión holística de la salud contenida en la Carta de la OMS. 3. Producimos materiales científicamente calificados, intelectualmente honestos, libres de sesgos comerciales, claramente escritos y presentados. 4. Organizamos la revista de manera tal que refleje y apoye la diversa comunidad internacional que trabaja en el campo de la medicina social. Para realizar los objetivos de “Salud para Todos” debemos tener una revista que incluya todas las voces.
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Reimbursement Policies for Medical Products Through Health Technology Assessment Pharmacoeconomic analysis of medical abortion in Bulgaria A comparative study of mental health of medical students in two countries Study of the terms for performing procedures under the HTA of a medicinal product in Bulgaria for the period 04.2016-12.2018 Biological food safety and health policy in this field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1