Evaluation of High Dissolving-Power Retarded Acid Recipes for Carbonate Acidizing

Norah W. Aljuryyed, A. M. A. Moajil, S. Alghamdi, Sajjad Aldarweesh
{"title":"Evaluation of High Dissolving-Power Retarded Acid Recipes for Carbonate Acidizing","authors":"Norah W. Aljuryyed, A. M. A. Moajil, S. Alghamdi, Sajjad Aldarweesh","doi":"10.2118/205542-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Development of retarded acid recipes that can have both adequate dissolving power and controllable reaction rate is desired to maximize the effectiveness of matrix stimulation treatments for oil and gas wells. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) has high dissolving power, however, the reaction rate with carbonate rock is uncontrollable and can cause face dissolution. Organic acids have low dissolving power and controllable reaction rate. The objective of this paper was to compare the effectiveness of three low viscosity retarded acid recipes with dissolving powers of 15 wt% and >20 wt% HCl equivalent.\n The examined acid recipes were 15/28 wt% emulsified acids, retarded acid recipes #1, #2 and #3, and 15/26 wt% HCl. The emulsified acids were at 30:70 ratio of diesel to acid. The retarded acid recipes were prepared at different dissolving power. Retarded acid recipe #3 was equivalent to 15 wt% HCl while retarded acid recipes #1 and #2 were equivalent to >20 wt% HCl.\n The calcite disc dissolution rate with retarded acids #1 and #2 was significantly lower than 26 wt% HCl and comparable to 15 wt% HCl at 75°F. The solubility of calcite discs in the retarded acid recipe #3 showed acid retardation higher than retarded acid recipes #1 and #2. The corrosion rate of retarded acid recipes #1 and #2 were 0.003-0.015 lb/ft2 at 250°F and 6 hrs, lower than both examined 26-28 wt% HCl and emulsified acids. The pitting indices of retarded acid recipes #1, #2, and #3 were 4, 2, and 1 respectively at 300°F. The pore volumes to breakthrough (PVBT) of retarded acid recipes #1 and #2 were slightly higher than retarded acid recipes #3 at 200°F. The PVBT values for 15 wt% and 28 wt% emulsified acid was comparable to retarded acid recipes #1, #2, and #3, confirming their retardation was effective.","PeriodicalId":10970,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205542-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Development of retarded acid recipes that can have both adequate dissolving power and controllable reaction rate is desired to maximize the effectiveness of matrix stimulation treatments for oil and gas wells. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) has high dissolving power, however, the reaction rate with carbonate rock is uncontrollable and can cause face dissolution. Organic acids have low dissolving power and controllable reaction rate. The objective of this paper was to compare the effectiveness of three low viscosity retarded acid recipes with dissolving powers of 15 wt% and >20 wt% HCl equivalent. The examined acid recipes were 15/28 wt% emulsified acids, retarded acid recipes #1, #2 and #3, and 15/26 wt% HCl. The emulsified acids were at 30:70 ratio of diesel to acid. The retarded acid recipes were prepared at different dissolving power. Retarded acid recipe #3 was equivalent to 15 wt% HCl while retarded acid recipes #1 and #2 were equivalent to >20 wt% HCl. The calcite disc dissolution rate with retarded acids #1 and #2 was significantly lower than 26 wt% HCl and comparable to 15 wt% HCl at 75°F. The solubility of calcite discs in the retarded acid recipe #3 showed acid retardation higher than retarded acid recipes #1 and #2. The corrosion rate of retarded acid recipes #1 and #2 were 0.003-0.015 lb/ft2 at 250°F and 6 hrs, lower than both examined 26-28 wt% HCl and emulsified acids. The pitting indices of retarded acid recipes #1, #2, and #3 were 4, 2, and 1 respectively at 300°F. The pore volumes to breakthrough (PVBT) of retarded acid recipes #1 and #2 were slightly higher than retarded acid recipes #3 at 200°F. The PVBT values for 15 wt% and 28 wt% emulsified acid was comparable to retarded acid recipes #1, #2, and #3, confirming their retardation was effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳酸盐酸化用高溶解力缓速酸配方的评价
为了最大限度地提高油气井基质增产的效果,需要开发既具有足够的溶解能力又能控制反应速率的缓速酸配方。盐酸(HCl)具有很强的溶解力,但与碳酸盐岩的反应速率不可控,易造成面溶。有机酸溶解力低,反应速率可控。本文的目的是比较三种低粘度缓速酸配方的效果,其中溶解力为15wt %和> 20wt % HCl当量。检测的酸配方为15/28 wt%乳化酸,缓凝酸配方1、2、3和15/26 wt%盐酸。乳化酸的柴油与酸的比例为30:70。在不同的溶解力下制备了缓速酸配方。配方3相当于15 wt%的盐酸,而配方1和配方2相当于>20 wt%的盐酸。在75°F时,缓速酸#1和#2的方解石圆盘溶解率显著低于26 wt% HCl,与15 wt% HCl相当。方解石圆盘在缓速酸配方3中的溶解度比缓速酸配方1和缓速酸配方2的溶解度高。缓速酸配方#1和#2在250°F和6小时的腐蚀速率为0.003-0.015 lb/ft2,低于测试的26-28 wt% HCl和乳化酸。缓速酸配方1、配方2和配方3在300°F时的点蚀指数分别为4、2和1。在200°F温度下,缓速酸配方1和2的孔隙体积(PVBT)略高于缓速酸配方3。15 wt%和28 wt%乳化酸的PVBT值与缓凝酸配方1、2和3相当,证实了它们的缓凝效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Successful Application of Managed Pressure Drilling and Cementing in Naturally Fractured Carbonates Environment of Prohorovskoe Exploration Well The Use of Induction Heating in Assessing the Technical Condition and Operating Intervals in Producing Wells A 3-Step Reaction Model For Numerical Simulation of In-Situ Combustion An Example of Building a Petrophysical Model of Unconsolidated Gas-Saturated Laminated Sediments Using Advanced Wireline and Logging While Drilling Services New method for Handling of Infrastructural Constraints for Integrated Modeling in Steady Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1