Platforms, profits and PISA for schools: new actors, by-passes and topological spaces in global educational governance

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Comparative Education Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/03050068.2022.2145006
S. Lewis, B. Lingard
{"title":"Platforms, profits and PISA for schools: new actors, by-passes and topological spaces in global educational governance","authors":"S. Lewis, B. Lingard","doi":"10.1080/03050068.2022.2145006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) PISA for Schools assessment. Our first substantive focus is a descriptive and analytical account of changes and developments in the functioning of this ground-breaking assessment since its creation in 2012. These changes include an expansion of the number and diversity of participating schools and countries, the introduction of a ‘user-pays’ model, the enhanced role of edtech firms and an explicit capacity-building focus, which we argue helps to strengthen an instrument constituency for the broader OECD testing regime. The second focus of the paper is the impact of PISA for Schools on changing modes of educational governance, situated against emerging spatialities of globalisation. Here, we provide an analysis using the concept of ‘by-passes’, which we elaborate as spatial, governance and systemic, to understand the new topological spatialities of globalisation and the global governance effects of these specific by-passes.","PeriodicalId":47655,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2145006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) PISA for Schools assessment. Our first substantive focus is a descriptive and analytical account of changes and developments in the functioning of this ground-breaking assessment since its creation in 2012. These changes include an expansion of the number and diversity of participating schools and countries, the introduction of a ‘user-pays’ model, the enhanced role of edtech firms and an explicit capacity-building focus, which we argue helps to strengthen an instrument constituency for the broader OECD testing regime. The second focus of the paper is the impact of PISA for Schools on changing modes of educational governance, situated against emerging spatialities of globalisation. Here, we provide an analysis using the concept of ‘by-passes’, which we elaborate as spatial, governance and systemic, to understand the new topological spatialities of globalisation and the global governance effects of these specific by-passes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校的平台、利润和PISA:全球教育治理中的新参与者、旁路和拓扑空间
本文主要研究经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的PISA学校评估。我们的第一个实质性重点是对这一开创性评估自2012年成立以来的运作变化和发展进行描述性和分析性描述。这些变化包括增加参与学校和国家的数量和多样性,引入“用户付费”模式,加强教育科技公司的作用,以及明确的能力建设重点,我们认为这有助于加强更广泛的经合组织测试制度的工具支持者。本文的第二个重点是PISA对学校教育治理模式变化的影响,与全球化的新兴空间性相反。在这里,我们使用“旁路”的概念进行分析,我们将其阐述为空间,治理和系统,以理解全球化的新拓扑空间性以及这些特定旁路的全球治理效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Education
Comparative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
21.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: This international journal of educational studies presents up-to-date information with analyses of significant problems and trends throughout the world. Comparative Education engages with challenging theoretical and methodological issues - and also considers the implications of comparative studies for the formation and implementation of policies - not only in education but in social, national and international development. Thus it welcomes contributions from associated disciplines in the fields of government, management, sociology - and indeed technology and communications - as these affect educational research and policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
A world agenda? How was universal primary education selected as a UN Millennium Development Goal? The same and the change: a topology of a Sino–French joint programme Education and choice in the United Kingdom: measuring school choice policies in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland (1980–2020) BRICS, sub-imperialism and education in Mozambique Special Issue of Comparative Education: Global governance and the promissory visions of education: challenges and agendas*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1