Comparison of landmark technique versus ultrasound guided technique for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries: A prospective randomized trial

Shilpashri A M, Seema Chikkanagoudar
{"title":"Comparison of landmark technique versus ultrasound guided technique for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries: A prospective randomized trial","authors":"Shilpashri A M, Seema Chikkanagoudar","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2023.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Brachial plexus block is a widely used regional anaesthesia technique for upper limb surgeries, with regional techniques gaining popularity over general anaesthesia. Recent advancements in anatomical sonography have improved the understanding and application of ultrasound-guided techniques. Ultrasound enables accurate needle placement /and real-time monitoring of drug distribution, enhancing the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of supraclavicular brachial plexus block using the landmark technique and ultrasound-guided technique in terms of procedure time, onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, effectiveness of the block, and complication rate. This prospective, randomized controlled study included 60 patients aged between 18 and 60 years, of either sex, belonging to ASA grade I and II, and undergoing elective or emergency upper limb surgeries (elbow, forearm, and hand surgeries). The patients were divided into two groups: Group LM (Landmark technique) and Group US (Ultrasound technique). Each patient received a supraclavicular brachial plexus block using either technique with 25ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, and relevant parameters were recorded.: The success rate was higher in Group US compared to Group LM, and no complications were observed. The onset of blockade was significantly faster, and the duration of the block was longer with the ultrasound-guided technique compared to the landmark technique. However, the time taken to administer the block was longer with the ultrasound technique.: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block is a safer technique with a higher success rate, providing more effective and prolonged block compared to the conventional landmark technique.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2023.051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Brachial plexus block is a widely used regional anaesthesia technique for upper limb surgeries, with regional techniques gaining popularity over general anaesthesia. Recent advancements in anatomical sonography have improved the understanding and application of ultrasound-guided techniques. Ultrasound enables accurate needle placement /and real-time monitoring of drug distribution, enhancing the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of supraclavicular brachial plexus block using the landmark technique and ultrasound-guided technique in terms of procedure time, onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, effectiveness of the block, and complication rate. This prospective, randomized controlled study included 60 patients aged between 18 and 60 years, of either sex, belonging to ASA grade I and II, and undergoing elective or emergency upper limb surgeries (elbow, forearm, and hand surgeries). The patients were divided into two groups: Group LM (Landmark technique) and Group US (Ultrasound technique). Each patient received a supraclavicular brachial plexus block using either technique with 25ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, and relevant parameters were recorded.: The success rate was higher in Group US compared to Group LM, and no complications were observed. The onset of blockade was significantly faster, and the duration of the block was longer with the ultrasound-guided technique compared to the landmark technique. However, the time taken to administer the block was longer with the ultrasound technique.: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block is a safer technique with a higher success rate, providing more effective and prolonged block compared to the conventional landmark technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标记技术与超声引导技术在上肢手术锁骨上臂丛阻滞中的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
臂丛阻滞是一种广泛应用于上肢手术的区域麻醉技术,区域麻醉比全身麻醉更受欢迎。近年来解剖超声技术的进步提高了对超声引导技术的理解和应用。超声能够精确地放置针头/实时监测药物分布,提高手术的有效性和安全性。本研究的目的是比较标志技术和超声引导技术在锁骨上臂丛阻滞的有效性,包括手术时间、感觉和运动阻滞的开始和持续时间、阻滞的有效性和并发症发生率。这项前瞻性、随机对照研究纳入60例患者,年龄在18 - 60岁之间,不分性别,属于ASA I级和II级,接受选择性或紧急上肢手术(肘部、前臂和手部手术)。患者分为两组:LM组(Landmark technology)和US组(Ultrasound technology)。两种方法均应用25ml 0.5%罗哌卡因行锁骨上臂丛阻滞,并记录相关参数。US组手术成功率高于LM组,无并发症发生。与地标技术相比,超声引导技术阻滞的开始时间明显更快,阻滞持续时间更长。然而,使用超声技术进行阻滞所需的时间更长。超声引导的锁骨上阻滞是一种更安全、成功率更高的技术,与传统的标志性技术相比,它提供了更有效和更持久的阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative study between curb-65 and psi/port score as predictors for ICU admission and mortality in community acquired pneumonia patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital An audit on the amount of drug wastage and the cost related to the disposal of unused intravenous agents in the operating theatres in a tertiary care hospital Oxygen generation and delivery: Start to end Anterior mediastinal masses: A single centre-based retrospective study Comparative study of tramadol and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular block: A cross sectional observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1