[A cross-sectional study of physical activity promotion projects and organizational factors in the workplace].

Kayo Kawamata, Satoru Kanamori, Yuko Kai, Mari Kusumoto, Satomi Sato, Hiroshige Jinnouchi
{"title":"[A cross-sectional study of physical activity promotion projects and organizational factors in the workplace].","authors":"Kayo Kawamata,&nbsp;Satoru Kanamori,&nbsp;Yuko Kai,&nbsp;Mari Kusumoto,&nbsp;Satomi Sato,&nbsp;Hiroshige Jinnouchi","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2022-017-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The benefits of physical activity are well-recognized but physical activity promotion projects (PAPP) are not well implemented in workplaces, resulting in an evidence-practice gap. This study identified the organizational factors associated with PAPP in the workplace in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire survey was postal mailed to 3,266 listed companies (with ≥ 50 employees) in Japan. The items surveyed included the presence or absence of PAPP and 29 organizational factors. Organizational factors were also extracted from interviews with corporate health managers. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted with the presence or absence of PAPP as the objective variable, each quartile group (Q1-Q4) of the total number of relevant organizational factors as the explanatory variable, and the basic workplace attributes as the covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis covered 301 workplaces. Of these, 98 (32.6%) had implemented PAPP. The adjusted odds ratio for PAPP for each group based on Q1 was 1.88 (0.62-5.70) for Q2, 3.38 (1.21-9.43) for Q3, and 29.69 (9.95-88.59) for Q4. The association between each organizational factor and PAPP was high for the constructs in the 'inner setting' of the CFIR. The observed adjusted odds ratios for these items were: 'there is a precedent for PAPP' 12.50 (6.42-24.34), 'there is a budget for the health department' 10.36 (5.24-20.47), 'understanding of the health department manager' 8.41 (4.43-15.99), 'understanding of workplace management' 7.63 (4.16-14.02), 'employee 7.31 (3.42-15.64), and 'requests from employees' 7.31 (3.42-15.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a quantity-response relationship between the number of applicable organizational factors and PAPP. It has been suggested that the expansion of organizational factors may lead to PAPP. In particular, the creation of an internal atmosphere and the promotion of understanding among the people concerned may be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":" ","pages":"260-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2022-017-E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The benefits of physical activity are well-recognized but physical activity promotion projects (PAPP) are not well implemented in workplaces, resulting in an evidence-practice gap. This study identified the organizational factors associated with PAPP in the workplace in Japan.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire survey was postal mailed to 3,266 listed companies (with ≥ 50 employees) in Japan. The items surveyed included the presence or absence of PAPP and 29 organizational factors. Organizational factors were also extracted from interviews with corporate health managers. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted with the presence or absence of PAPP as the objective variable, each quartile group (Q1-Q4) of the total number of relevant organizational factors as the explanatory variable, and the basic workplace attributes as the covariate.

Results: The analysis covered 301 workplaces. Of these, 98 (32.6%) had implemented PAPP. The adjusted odds ratio for PAPP for each group based on Q1 was 1.88 (0.62-5.70) for Q2, 3.38 (1.21-9.43) for Q3, and 29.69 (9.95-88.59) for Q4. The association between each organizational factor and PAPP was high for the constructs in the 'inner setting' of the CFIR. The observed adjusted odds ratios for these items were: 'there is a precedent for PAPP' 12.50 (6.42-24.34), 'there is a budget for the health department' 10.36 (5.24-20.47), 'understanding of the health department manager' 8.41 (4.43-15.99), 'understanding of workplace management' 7.63 (4.16-14.02), 'employee 7.31 (3.42-15.64), and 'requests from employees' 7.31 (3.42-15.64).

Conclusion: There was a quantity-response relationship between the number of applicable organizational factors and PAPP. It has been suggested that the expansion of organizational factors may lead to PAPP. In particular, the creation of an internal atmosphere and the promotion of understanding among the people concerned may be useful.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[对工作场所体育活动促进项目和组织因素的横断面研究]。
目标:体育活动的好处得到了很好的认可,但体育活动促进项目(PAPP)在工作场所没有得到很好的实施,导致了证据与实践之间的差距。本研究确定了与日本工作场所PAPP相关的组织因素。方法:对日本3266家上市公司(员工≥50人)进行问卷调查。调查项目包括是否存在PAPP和29个组织因素。组织因素也从企业健康经理的访谈中提取。采用了实施研究综合框架。以有无PAPP为客观变量,相关组织因素总数的每个四分位数组(Q1-Q4)为解释变量,工作场所基本属性为协变量,进行多元逻辑回归分析。结果:该分析覆盖了301个工作场所。其中98人(32.6%)实施了PAPP。根据第一季度,每组PAPP的调整比值比为1.88(0.62-5.70),第三季度为3.38(1.21-9.43),第四季度为29.69(9.95-88.59)。对于CFIR的“内部环境”中的结构,每个组织因素与PAPP之间的相关性很高。观察到的这些项目的调整后比值比为:“PAPP有先例”12.50(6.42-24.34),“卫生部门有预算”10.36(5.24-20.47),“对卫生部门经理的理解”8.41(4.43-15.99),“工作场所管理的理解”7.63(4.16-14.02),“员工7.31(3.42-15.64),结论:适用组织因素数量与PAPP之间存在量效关系。有人认为,组织因素的扩大可能导致PAPP。特别是,营造内部气氛和促进有关人民之间的理解可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
[Selecting measurement subject workers for evaluation using a personal sampling method: a case involving analytical chemistry experiments at a university laboratory]. [The past and future of occupational health nursing research in Japan]. [Association between mental health, fear of COVID-19, and job insecurity among bus service workers during the COVID-19 pandemic]. [Convenient health initiatives to help small- and medium-sized enterprises with mental health, lifestyle-related diseases, and hazardous work]. [Development and validation of the University of Tokyo Occupational Mental Health leadership checklist among occupational health specialists].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1