Indonesian Muslims’ Cognitive Pattern on Social Media During Political Disagreements

Rena Latifa, A. Shaleh, Melanie A Nyhof
{"title":"Indonesian Muslims’ Cognitive Pattern on Social Media During Political Disagreements","authors":"Rena Latifa, A. Shaleh, Melanie A Nyhof","doi":"10.15642/JKI.2018.8.1.1-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2017 Jakarta governor election had encoura­ged polarization among Muslims, including among media social users: those who agreed and tho­se who disagreed with voting for Basuki Ahok Tjahaja Purnama since he was prose­cuted for allegedly committing blasphemy. This study has examined the cognitive pattern amongst disputants: whet­her cognitive pattern and religiosity contribute to poli­tical disagreements or not. Participants were Indonesia’s Muslim social media users (N=300). Using multiple regres­sion analysis, the findings have demonstrated that analytical thin­king produces higher disagreement than ho­listic thinking. In addition, higher level of religiosity produces higher disagree­ment.","PeriodicalId":31785,"journal":{"name":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/JKI.2018.8.1.1-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2017 Jakarta governor election had encoura­ged polarization among Muslims, including among media social users: those who agreed and tho­se who disagreed with voting for Basuki Ahok Tjahaja Purnama since he was prose­cuted for allegedly committing blasphemy. This study has examined the cognitive pattern amongst disputants: whet­her cognitive pattern and religiosity contribute to poli­tical disagreements or not. Participants were Indonesia’s Muslim social media users (N=300). Using multiple regres­sion analysis, the findings have demonstrated that analytical thin­king produces higher disagreement than ho­listic thinking. In addition, higher level of religiosity produces higher disagree­ment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼穆斯林在政治分歧期间对社交媒体的认知模式
2017年雅加达省长选举导致穆斯林,包括社交媒体用户之间出现两极分化:赞成和反对投票给钟万学的人,因为钟万学因涉嫌亵渎神明而被起诉。本研究考察了争论者之间的认知模式:她的认知模式和宗教信仰是否有助于政治分歧。参与者是印度尼西亚的穆斯林社交媒体用户(N=300)。通过多元回归分析,研究结果表明,分析型瘦王比整体思维产生更高的分歧。此外,宗教虔诚程度越高,分歧越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deradicalization Narratives from Former Convicts in the Digital Space: Sofyan Tsauri’s YouTube Channel Analysis Kontestasi Media Digital: Analisis Tagar #BubarkanMUI versus #DukungMUI Reformulation of Da’wah Communication Paradigm in the Post-Pandemic Era Konstruksi Gender dalam Media Islam dan Sekuler COMMUNICATING SUFI TEACHINGS IN 21ST CENTURY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1