What is a media company today? Rethinking theoretical and empirical definitions

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION Studies in Communication Media Pub Date : 2019-03-24 DOI:10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-29
D. Voci, M. Karmasin, Pamela Nölleke-Przybylski, Klaus-Dieter Altmeppen, J. Möller, M. B. Rimscha
{"title":"What is a media company today? Rethinking theoretical and empirical definitions","authors":"D. Voci, M. Karmasin, Pamela Nölleke-Przybylski, Klaus-Dieter Altmeppen, J. Möller, M. B. Rimscha","doi":"10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every day, media managers face different challenges in a constantly changing global economic, cultural and technological setting (Hollifield, Leblanc Wicks, Sylvie, & Lowrey, 2016, p. 110, 177; Albarran, 2013; Shaver & Shaver, 2008; Hollifield, 2001). Between all these challenges, questions on what a media company is today, how it might be defined and the kinds of features characterizing it often remain unanswered. These questions are rarely addressed by authors and scholars working in both business economics, journalism, media, and communication science, maybe because there is the existing assumption of a self-evident and generally accepted definition of the term “media company” (as argued by Sjurts, 2004, p. 390) which actually does not exist. The aim of this paper is therefore to offer an overview of the existing theoretical approaches used to define “media companies,” to identify possible shortcomings of each definitional approach and, deduced from there, to suggest a theoretically sound and empirically applicable approach, which takes into account the challenges and needs of the actual media landscape.","PeriodicalId":32930,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Communication Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Communication Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Every day, media managers face different challenges in a constantly changing global economic, cultural and technological setting (Hollifield, Leblanc Wicks, Sylvie, & Lowrey, 2016, p. 110, 177; Albarran, 2013; Shaver & Shaver, 2008; Hollifield, 2001). Between all these challenges, questions on what a media company is today, how it might be defined and the kinds of features characterizing it often remain unanswered. These questions are rarely addressed by authors and scholars working in both business economics, journalism, media, and communication science, maybe because there is the existing assumption of a self-evident and generally accepted definition of the term “media company” (as argued by Sjurts, 2004, p. 390) which actually does not exist. The aim of this paper is therefore to offer an overview of the existing theoretical approaches used to define “media companies,” to identify possible shortcomings of each definitional approach and, deduced from there, to suggest a theoretically sound and empirically applicable approach, which takes into account the challenges and needs of the actual media landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
今天的媒体公司是什么?重新思考理论和实证定义
每天,媒体经理在不断变化的全球经济,文化和技术环境中面临不同的挑战(Hollifield, Leblanc Wicks, Sylvie, & Lowrey, 2016, p. 110,177;Albarran, 2013;Shaver & Shaver, 2008;Hollifield, 2001)。在所有这些挑战中,关于今天的媒体公司是什么、如何定义它以及它的特征等问题往往没有答案。这些问题很少被从事商业经济学、新闻学、媒体和传播科学的作者和学者所解决,也许是因为现有的“媒体公司”一词的不言自明和普遍接受的定义的假设(如Sjurts所争论的,2004,p. 390)实际上并不存在。因此,本文的目的是概述用于定义“媒体公司”的现有理论方法,找出每种定义方法可能存在的缺点,并由此推断出一种理论上合理且经验上适用的方法,该方法考虑到实际媒体环境的挑战和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Communication Media
Studies in Communication Media Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Von Laien und Profis: Typen politischer Influencerkommunikation auf YouTube About amateurs and professionals: Types of political influencer communication on YouTube Legal series and legal careers: Investigating relationships between watching the legal drama Suits and law school enrollment Between cat content and Yeswecan!cer: Digital media repertoires for disease management of young cancer patients COVID-19 sceptics’ attitudes and expectations toward the media: Understanding the role of moral judgements on trust and distrust in journalistic communication on COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1