Comparison of performance of k-nearest neighbor algorithm using smote and k-nearest neighbor algorithm without smote in diagnosis of diabetes disease in balanced data

A. Pertiwi, N. Bachtiar, R. Kusumaningrum, I. Waspada, A. Wibowo
{"title":"Comparison of performance of k-nearest neighbor algorithm using smote and k-nearest neighbor algorithm without smote in diagnosis of diabetes disease in balanced data","authors":"A. Pertiwi, N. Bachtiar, R. Kusumaningrum, I. Waspada, A. Wibowo","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/1524/1/012048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the Indonesian Health Profile in 2017, diabetes is one of the causes of death for almost 70% in the world. The high mortality rate induces the need for making the effort to reduce the number of people with diabetes by conducting studies that lead to making a diagnosis so that can detect a person with diabetes accurately. This study tries to compare the performance of the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique and the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm without Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique in diagnosing diabetes on imbalanced datasets. The parameters tested are the k value of the K-Nearest Neighbors and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. The testing is carried out using the K-Fold Cross Validation strategy. The data used in this study were 3876 data from Pertamina Central Hospital. Based on the results of tests conducted, it shows that the value of accuracy produced in diagnosing diabetes by using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique is better than the accuracy produced without using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique with the highest accuracy increase of 8.25%. The highest average accuracy is obtained when the value of k = 3 in the K-Nearest Neighbors, k = 5 in the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, and fold = 10, which reaches 78.06%.","PeriodicalId":16821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics: Conference Series","volume":"175 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics: Conference Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1524/1/012048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

According to the Indonesian Health Profile in 2017, diabetes is one of the causes of death for almost 70% in the world. The high mortality rate induces the need for making the effort to reduce the number of people with diabetes by conducting studies that lead to making a diagnosis so that can detect a person with diabetes accurately. This study tries to compare the performance of the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique and the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm without Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique in diagnosing diabetes on imbalanced datasets. The parameters tested are the k value of the K-Nearest Neighbors and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. The testing is carried out using the K-Fold Cross Validation strategy. The data used in this study were 3876 data from Pertamina Central Hospital. Based on the results of tests conducted, it shows that the value of accuracy produced in diagnosing diabetes by using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique is better than the accuracy produced without using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique with the highest accuracy increase of 8.25%. The highest average accuracy is obtained when the value of k = 3 in the K-Nearest Neighbors, k = 5 in the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, and fold = 10, which reaches 78.06%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡数据中使用smote的k近邻算法与不使用smote的k近邻算法在糖尿病诊断中的性能比较
根据2017年印度尼西亚健康概况,糖尿病是世界上近70%的人死亡的原因之一。高死亡率促使人们需要努力减少糖尿病患者的数量,通过开展研究来做出诊断,以便能够准确地发现糖尿病患者。本研究试图比较使用合成少数派过采样技术的k近邻算法和不使用合成少数派过采样技术的k近邻算法在不平衡数据集上诊断糖尿病的性能。测试的参数是k近邻的k值和合成少数过采样技术。测试使用K-Fold交叉验证策略进行。本研究使用的数据是来自Pertamina中心医院的3876份数据。试验结果表明,采用合成少数派过采样技术诊断糖尿病的准确度高于不采用合成少数派过采样技术诊断糖尿病的准确度,准确度最高可提高8.25%。k - nearest Neighbors中k = 3、Synthetic Minority oversampling中k = 5、fold = 10的平均准确率最高,达到78.06%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research and design of low-noise cooling fan for fuel cell vehicle Enhanced heat transfer technology for solar air heaters Comparison of thermo-catalytic and photo-assisted thermo-catalytic conversion of glucose to HMF with Cr-MOFs@ZrO2 Mechanical integrity analysis of caprock during the CO2 injection phase Numerical study of film cooling at the outlet of gas turbine exhaust
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1