Comparative Analysis on the Biomass Production between Machine-Transplanted and Water-Broadcast Seeded Silage Rice in the Central Plain Area of Korea

Woonho Yang, J. Park, 강신구, 김숙진, 최종서
{"title":"Comparative Analysis on the Biomass Production between Machine-Transplanted and Water-Broadcast Seeded Silage Rice in the Central Plain Area of Korea","authors":"Woonho Yang, J. Park, 강신구, 김숙진, 최종서","doi":"10.7740/kjcs.2018.63.3.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field study was conducted over a 3-year period from 2014 to 2016 in the central plain area, Suwon, Korea, 1) to compare the biomass production between machine-transplanted and water-broadcast seeded silage rice and 2) to elucidate the growth factors that affect the difference in biomass production between the two cultivation practices. The heading date for the water-broadcast seeded silage rice was September 11-18, which was delayed by 11-17 days when compared to that for the machine-transplanted silage rice. On average, water-broadcast seeded silage rice had a shorter plant height, more panicles per area, and a greater biomass production because of the increased straw dry weight. However, the difference in dry weight of each plant organ between the two cultivation practices exhibited yearly variation. When the data were pooled across experimental years, cultivation practices, and varieties, biomass production was highly positively correlated with straw dry weight but not with panicle dry weight. When the ratio of water-broadcast seeding to machine-transplanting was analyzed, total dry weight and straw dry weight were positively associated with each other, whereas no relationship was found between total dry weight and panicle dry weight. Despite that water-broadcast seeded silage rice produced more panicles per area than machine-transplanted silage rice, the two cultivation practices had a similar dry weight per culm. Therefore, we conclude that the silage rice from the water-broadcast seeding, compared to the machine-transplanting, produced more biomass because of the combination of the increased panicle number per area and a similar dry weight per culm. These results suggest that silage rice could be produced through water-broadcast seeding to increase biomass production with low labor and cost input.","PeriodicalId":22717,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Crop Science","volume":"120 4","pages":"186-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2018.63.3.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field study was conducted over a 3-year period from 2014 to 2016 in the central plain area, Suwon, Korea, 1) to compare the biomass production between machine-transplanted and water-broadcast seeded silage rice and 2) to elucidate the growth factors that affect the difference in biomass production between the two cultivation practices. The heading date for the water-broadcast seeded silage rice was September 11-18, which was delayed by 11-17 days when compared to that for the machine-transplanted silage rice. On average, water-broadcast seeded silage rice had a shorter plant height, more panicles per area, and a greater biomass production because of the increased straw dry weight. However, the difference in dry weight of each plant organ between the two cultivation practices exhibited yearly variation. When the data were pooled across experimental years, cultivation practices, and varieties, biomass production was highly positively correlated with straw dry weight but not with panicle dry weight. When the ratio of water-broadcast seeding to machine-transplanting was analyzed, total dry weight and straw dry weight were positively associated with each other, whereas no relationship was found between total dry weight and panicle dry weight. Despite that water-broadcast seeded silage rice produced more panicles per area than machine-transplanted silage rice, the two cultivation practices had a similar dry weight per culm. Therefore, we conclude that the silage rice from the water-broadcast seeding, compared to the machine-transplanting, produced more biomass because of the combination of the increased panicle number per area and a similar dry weight per culm. These results suggest that silage rice could be produced through water-broadcast seeding to increase biomass production with low labor and cost input.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国中原地区机栽与水播青贮水稻生物量产量的比较分析
本研究于2014 - 2016年在韩国水原(Suwon)中部平原地区进行了为期3年的野外研究,1)比较机播和水播青贮水稻的生物量产量,2)阐明影响两种栽培方式生物量差异的生长因子。水播青贮水稻的抽穗期为9月11 ~ 18日,比机插青贮水稻推迟了11 ~ 17天。平均而言,水播青贮水稻由于秸秆干重增加,株高较低,单株穗数较多,生物量产量较高。然而,两种栽培方式间各植物器官干重的差异呈年变化。对不同试验年份、栽培方式和品种的数据进行汇总,生物量产量与秸秆干重呈高度正相关,而与穗干重不呈正相关。水播与机插比例分析表明,总干重与秸秆干重呈显著正相关,而总干重与穗部干重无显著相关。尽管水播青贮水稻比机栽青贮水稻亩产穗数更多,但两种栽培方法的每根茎干重相似。因此,我们得出结论,与机栽相比,水播青贮水稻产生的生物量更多,因为每面积穗数增加,每茎干重相似。综上所述,青贮水稻可通过水播提高生物质产量,且人工投入低,成本低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of the Response of Two Lines of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) to Cold Stress Evaluation on the Effects of Deicing Salts on Crop using Seedling Emergence Assay of Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) Review on Adaptability of Rice Varieties and Cultivation Technology According to Climate Change in Korea Investigation of Changes in Grain Quality and Physicochemical Properties of Rice According to the Temperature during the Ripening Stage and Preharvest Sprouting Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Accessions from Five Different Origins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1