Penicillin Binding Proteins3 and 4 Relations between Resistance Phenotypes and mecA, TEM genes expression in Staphylococcal aureus

Yae Sung Mun, Yuan Li, Y. Seo, Y. Hwang
{"title":"Penicillin Binding Proteins3 and 4 Relations between Resistance Phenotypes and mecA, TEM genes expression in Staphylococcal aureus","authors":"Yae Sung Mun, Yuan Li, Y. Seo, Y. Hwang","doi":"10.36648/1989-8436.10.4.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was to determine the relationship between pbp3 and pbp4 gene compared with mecA and TEM resistance genes expression patterns. Total 134 clinical S. aureus strains were subjected to 19 antimicrobial susceptibility tests. We detected resistance to methicillin (mecA), penicillin (blaTEM) and expression of pbp (Penicillin-binding proteins) genes. We were compared blaTEM, extended spectrum, carbapenem related genes and types of SCCmec identified. Total of 134 clinical S. aureus strains, 79 (58.96%) in methicillin resistance, and 77 strains carried mecA. Prevalence rates of blaTEM and pbp genes were 107/134 (79.85%) and 128/134 (95.52%). Multiplex PCR results revealed that the predominant SCCmec type among 77 mecA-positive MRSA strains were similer too SCCmec type II 41.56% (32/77) and type IVA 40.26% (31/77). Prevalence rates of type IVb, IVd and non-typable were 18.18% (14/77), respectively. From a total of 77/134 (57.46%) MRSA isolate strains, 35/77 (45.46%) were positive for extended spectrum, 40/77 (51.95%) for cephalosporins, and 35/77 (45.46%) for carbapenems. The predominant SCCmec type II had more carbapenem resistances than IVA, IVb and IVd. TEM and mecA gene expression were not correlated with pbp gene, and the properties of drug resistance were appeared not associated with pbp3, 4 genes.","PeriodicalId":8142,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"131 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1989-8436.10.4.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study was to determine the relationship between pbp3 and pbp4 gene compared with mecA and TEM resistance genes expression patterns. Total 134 clinical S. aureus strains were subjected to 19 antimicrobial susceptibility tests. We detected resistance to methicillin (mecA), penicillin (blaTEM) and expression of pbp (Penicillin-binding proteins) genes. We were compared blaTEM, extended spectrum, carbapenem related genes and types of SCCmec identified. Total of 134 clinical S. aureus strains, 79 (58.96%) in methicillin resistance, and 77 strains carried mecA. Prevalence rates of blaTEM and pbp genes were 107/134 (79.85%) and 128/134 (95.52%). Multiplex PCR results revealed that the predominant SCCmec type among 77 mecA-positive MRSA strains were similer too SCCmec type II 41.56% (32/77) and type IVA 40.26% (31/77). Prevalence rates of type IVb, IVd and non-typable were 18.18% (14/77), respectively. From a total of 77/134 (57.46%) MRSA isolate strains, 35/77 (45.46%) were positive for extended spectrum, 40/77 (51.95%) for cephalosporins, and 35/77 (45.46%) for carbapenems. The predominant SCCmec type II had more carbapenem resistances than IVA, IVb and IVd. TEM and mecA gene expression were not correlated with pbp gene, and the properties of drug resistance were appeared not associated with pbp3, 4 genes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金黄色葡萄球菌耐药表型与mecA、TEM基因表达的关系
本研究旨在通过与mecA和TEM耐药基因表达谱的比较,确定pbp3和pbp4基因之间的关系。对134株临床金黄色葡萄球菌进行19项药敏试验。我们检测了对甲氧西林(mecA)、青霉素(blaTEM)的耐药性和pbp(青霉素结合蛋白)基因的表达。我们比较了blaTEM,扩展谱,碳青霉烯类相关基因和SCCmec的类型。共有134名临床金黄色葡萄球菌菌株79年耐甲氧西林(58.96%),和77株台面式晶体管。blaTEM和pbp基因的检出率分别为107/134(79.85%)和128/134(95.52%)。多重PCR结果显示,77株meca阳性MRSA菌株的优势SCCmec类型相似,SCCmec II型为41.56% (32/77),IVA型为40.26%(31/77)。IVb型、IVd型和非分型患病率分别为18.18%(14/77)。在77/134株(57.46%)MRSA分离株中,延伸谱阳性35/77株(45.46%),头孢菌素阳性40/77株(51.95%),碳青霉烯类阳性35/77株(45.46%)。优势SCCmecⅱ型比IVA、IVb和IVd型对碳青霉烯类耐药更多。TEM和mecA基因表达与pbp基因无相关性,耐药特性与pbp3、4基因无相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Corona Virus Problem Via Linear Time-Equation Editorial Note on Black Fungus Electric and Magnetic Field Applications as Alternative or Supportive Therapy for Covid-19... Electrochemical Methods for the Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance and Multi-Drug Resistance Bacteria Evaluation of Correlations Between Bladder Detrusor Overactivity and Lower Urinary Tract Infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1