Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Long Stent Implantation with First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Following Rotational Atherectomy

Dongeon Kim, Suyeong Park, I. Moon, M. Kong, Hyun-Woo Park, H. Choi, H. Seo, J. Suh, N. Lee, Y. Cho
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Long Stent Implantation with First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Following Rotational Atherectomy","authors":"Dongeon Kim, Suyeong Park, I. Moon, M. Kong, Hyun-Woo Park, H. Choi, H. Seo, J. Suh, N. Lee, Y. Cho","doi":"10.15746/sms.22.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Rotational atherectomy (RA) and newly developed second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) support the strategy of longer stent deployment in comparison to short stent implantations in the past. However, studies analyzing the outcome of patients who received long stent implantation following RA are few in number. The present study compared the clinical outcomes of patients with the coronary arterial disease (CAD) who underwent RA with long stent implantation using first- and second-generation DES.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at the single center from March 2003 to October 2019. Eighty-seven patients with CAD who underwent RA with ≥32 mm long stent implantation were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups according to the type of DES. As a primary endpoint, the cumulative 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis (ST) was compared by DES type. Adjusted interaction between the type of stent and clinical variables was estimated to determine the predictor variables of MACE.Results: The second-generation DES group was associated with a shorter procedure duration and more common usage of intravascular ultrasound in procedural characteristics. In the second-generation DES group, a trend toward a lower rate of MI and ST existed. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were not significantly different. When combined with MACE, we could identify a significant reduction in the second-generation DES group.Conclusion: In comparison to the first-generation DES group, the second-generation DES group was associated with a lower rate of MACE for 2 years in patients who underwent RA with long stent implantation.","PeriodicalId":22016,"journal":{"name":"Soonchunhyang Medical Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soonchunhyang Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15746/sms.22.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Rotational atherectomy (RA) and newly developed second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) support the strategy of longer stent deployment in comparison to short stent implantations in the past. However, studies analyzing the outcome of patients who received long stent implantation following RA are few in number. The present study compared the clinical outcomes of patients with the coronary arterial disease (CAD) who underwent RA with long stent implantation using first- and second-generation DES.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at the single center from March 2003 to October 2019. Eighty-seven patients with CAD who underwent RA with ≥32 mm long stent implantation were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups according to the type of DES. As a primary endpoint, the cumulative 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis (ST) was compared by DES type. Adjusted interaction between the type of stent and clinical variables was estimated to determine the predictor variables of MACE.Results: The second-generation DES group was associated with a shorter procedure duration and more common usage of intravascular ultrasound in procedural characteristics. In the second-generation DES group, a trend toward a lower rate of MI and ST existed. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were not significantly different. When combined with MACE, we could identify a significant reduction in the second-generation DES group.Conclusion: In comparison to the first-generation DES group, the second-generation DES group was associated with a lower rate of MACE for 2 years in patients who underwent RA with long stent implantation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术后长支架植入与第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架的临床效果比较
目的:旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA)和新开发的第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)与过去的短支架植入相比,支持更长的支架部署策略。然而,分析RA术后长期支架植入术患者预后的研究很少。本研究比较了第一代和第二代des对冠心病(CAD) RA患者行长支架植入术的临床结果。方法:2003年3月至2019年10月在单中心进行回顾性队列研究。87例CAD患者行RA≥32mm支架植入术,纳入研究,根据DES类型分为两组,以DES类型为主要终点,比较2年内主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的累计发生率,包括死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、靶血管重建术、支架血栓形成(ST)。评估支架类型与临床变量之间调整后的相互作用,以确定MACE的预测变量。结果:第二代DES组手术时间更短,手术特征中血管内超声的使用更普遍。在第二代DES组中,心肌梗死和ST发生率有降低的趋势。全因死亡率和心血管死亡率无显著差异。当与MACE联合使用时,我们可以发现第二代DES组显著减少。结论:与第一代DES组相比,第二代DES组在RA长支架植入术患者2年内MACE发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Atrial Fibrillation after COVID-19 Vaccination in an Adolescent: A Case Report A Case of Extremely Premature Baby with Persistent Metabolic Acidosis, Hypoglycemia and Dyselectrolytemia Induced by Liposomal Amphotericin B Comparison of the Agitation-Reducing Effects of Esmolol and Lidocaine in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Study The Coexistence of Fibromuscular Dysplasia of the Renal Artery and Graves’ Disease in an Adolescent: A Case Report Monitored Anesthesia Care Primarily Using Dexmedetomidine Provides Safe Sedation and Analgesic Effect in Uterine Artery Embolization: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1