Use of statins and serum levels of Prostate Specific Antigen

Ana Ferro , Francisco Pina , Milton Severo , Pedro Dias , Francisco Botelho , Nuno Lunet
{"title":"Use of statins and serum levels of Prostate Specific Antigen","authors":"Ana Ferro ,&nbsp;Francisco Pina ,&nbsp;Milton Severo ,&nbsp;Pedro Dias ,&nbsp;Francisco Botelho ,&nbsp;Nuno Lunet","doi":"10.1016/j.acup.2015.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To quantify the effect of statins’ use on Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels in patients referred to prostate biopsy and to determinate if the exposure to statins must be considered to improve the prostate cancer diagnostic accuracy of PSA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We selected 551 subjects with PSA &lt;10.0<!--> <!-->ng/mL, referred to ultrasound guided trans-rectal prostate biopsy and classified as cancer or non-cancer patients after biopsy. Information regarding statins’ use was obtained from clinical records. We used path analysis to quantify the direct (reflects the influence on PSA biology and metabolism) indirect (reflects the influence on PSA through the effect on the risk of prostate cancer) and total effects (net result of direct and indirect effects) of statins’ use on PSA. We used Receiver Operating Characteristic curves to assess the global predictive accuracy of models including PSA, age, body mass index, 5-α-reductase inhibitors, aspirin and statins’ use for distinguishing between prostate cancer and benign conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed a negative total effect of statins on PSA levels (users vs. non-users: −0.633<!--> <!-->ng/mL; 95% CI: −1.087; −0.179), which corresponds to approximately 8.9% lower levels among statins’ users, mostly due to the direct effect (−0.588<!--> <!-->ng/mL; 95% CI: −1.034, −0.141) rather than that by the indirect effect (−0.045<!--> <!-->ng/mL; 95% CI: −0.152, 0.061). There were no statistically significant differences between the area under the curve corresponding to the models with or without statins (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.274).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients referred to prostate biopsy, statins’ use contributed to lower Prostate Specific Antigen levels, but the clinical impact in these patients is low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100020,"journal":{"name":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acup.2015.02.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Urológica Portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341402215000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify the effect of statins’ use on Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels in patients referred to prostate biopsy and to determinate if the exposure to statins must be considered to improve the prostate cancer diagnostic accuracy of PSA.

Methods

We selected 551 subjects with PSA <10.0 ng/mL, referred to ultrasound guided trans-rectal prostate biopsy and classified as cancer or non-cancer patients after biopsy. Information regarding statins’ use was obtained from clinical records. We used path analysis to quantify the direct (reflects the influence on PSA biology and metabolism) indirect (reflects the influence on PSA through the effect on the risk of prostate cancer) and total effects (net result of direct and indirect effects) of statins’ use on PSA. We used Receiver Operating Characteristic curves to assess the global predictive accuracy of models including PSA, age, body mass index, 5-α-reductase inhibitors, aspirin and statins’ use for distinguishing between prostate cancer and benign conditions.

Results

We observed a negative total effect of statins on PSA levels (users vs. non-users: −0.633 ng/mL; 95% CI: −1.087; −0.179), which corresponds to approximately 8.9% lower levels among statins’ users, mostly due to the direct effect (−0.588 ng/mL; 95% CI: −1.034, −0.141) rather than that by the indirect effect (−0.045 ng/mL; 95% CI: −0.152, 0.061). There were no statistically significant differences between the area under the curve corresponding to the models with or without statins (P = 0.274).

Conclusion

In patients referred to prostate biopsy, statins’ use contributed to lower Prostate Specific Antigen levels, but the clinical impact in these patients is low.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他汀类药物的使用和前列腺特异性抗原的血清水平
目的量化他汀类药物使用对前列腺活检患者前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平的影响,并确定是否必须考虑他汀类药物暴露以提高PSA诊断前列腺癌的准确性。方法选择PSA≤10.0 ng/mL的551例患者,行超声引导下经直肠前列腺活检,活检后分为癌和非癌患者。有关他汀类药物使用的信息来自临床记录。我们使用通径分析来量化他汀类药物对PSA的直接(反映对PSA生物学和代谢的影响)间接(通过对前列腺癌风险的影响反映对PSA的影响)和总效应(直接效应和间接效应的净结果)。我们使用受试者工作特征曲线来评估包括PSA、年龄、体重指数、5-α-还原酶抑制剂、阿司匹林和他汀类药物用于区分前列腺癌和良性疾病的模型的全局预测准确性。我们观察到他汀类药物对PSA水平的总体负影响(使用者与非使用者:−0.633 ng/mL;95% ci:−1.087;−0.179),这相当于他汀类药物使用者的水平降低了约8.9%,主要是由于直接影响(−0.588 ng/mL;95% CI:−1.034,−0.141),而非间接效应(−0.045 ng/mL;95% ci:−0.152,0.061)。有无他汀类药物模型对应的曲线下面积差异无统计学意义(P = 0.274)。结论在前列腺活检患者中,他汀类药物的使用有助于降低前列腺特异性抗原水平,但对这些患者的临床影响较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cistectomia Radical com Neobexiga Ortotópica de Studer Assistida por Robot com Preservação de Órgãos Pélvicos The High Resolution MASS spectrometry in Personalised Medicine: Retinol-Binding Protein 4 as a Candidate Biomarker Predictor of Progression in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma Traumatismo Renal: Análise Retrospetiva de 5 Anos de um Centro de Trauma de Nível 1 Evaluation of Long-Term Sexual Satisfaction in Women Submitted to Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Retrospective Tertiary Center Study Trexit: A “Clean” Withdrawal from Transrectal Prostate Biopsies – Prospective Results of In-office Freehand Transperineal Biopsies Under Local Anaesthesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1