Computing the Lagrangians of the standard model

Q1 Mathematics Journal of Applied Logic Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jal.2015.09.015
S.A. Selesnick , J.P. Rawling
{"title":"Computing the Lagrangians of the standard model","authors":"S.A. Selesnick ,&nbsp;J.P. Rawling","doi":"10.1016/j.jal.2015.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ordinary quantum logic has well known pathologies rendering it useless for the purposes of computation. However, loosely related logics, based upon variants of Girard's Linear Logic, have been found useful in the context of quantum computation. In one sense, the use of such computational schemes affords a meta level view of the possible provenance of certain expressions not otherwise apparent. Since such logics are presumed to encapsulate the essential behavior of quantum “resources” we may entertain the question as to whether this logical or computational approach could have any bearing upon quantum physics itself. In this article we address the question of the genesis of certain fundamental Lagrangians, namely those occurring in the standard model. If a certain set of sentences in a logic are added to the set of axioms of the logic the resulting structure is generally called a <em>theory</em> by logicians. In this paper we shall introduce a version of such a logic and deduce some of its physical ramifications. Namely, we will show that there is a single type of sequent that, when added to the logical calculus at hand as an axiom, generates in the theory so defined, series whose leading terms match exactly the Yang–Mills Lagrangian density (including a gauge fixing term) and also the Einstein–Hilbert Lagrangian density, most of the remaining terms being negligible at low intensities in both cases. By expanding the logic somewhat, in the manner of second quantization, we are able also to give an account of interaction terms in the Yang–Mills case. This shows that there is a common form ancestral to all the Lagrangians of the standard model in the ensemble of “evolutionary” trees provided by deductions in a certain clearly specified logic, and reveals the differences between the Yang–Mills and gravitational kinetic terms. Thus we acquire a new paradigm for “unification” of the fundamental forces at the level of the underlying logic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Logic","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 809-824"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jal.2015.09.015","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570868315000841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ordinary quantum logic has well known pathologies rendering it useless for the purposes of computation. However, loosely related logics, based upon variants of Girard's Linear Logic, have been found useful in the context of quantum computation. In one sense, the use of such computational schemes affords a meta level view of the possible provenance of certain expressions not otherwise apparent. Since such logics are presumed to encapsulate the essential behavior of quantum “resources” we may entertain the question as to whether this logical or computational approach could have any bearing upon quantum physics itself. In this article we address the question of the genesis of certain fundamental Lagrangians, namely those occurring in the standard model. If a certain set of sentences in a logic are added to the set of axioms of the logic the resulting structure is generally called a theory by logicians. In this paper we shall introduce a version of such a logic and deduce some of its physical ramifications. Namely, we will show that there is a single type of sequent that, when added to the logical calculus at hand as an axiom, generates in the theory so defined, series whose leading terms match exactly the Yang–Mills Lagrangian density (including a gauge fixing term) and also the Einstein–Hilbert Lagrangian density, most of the remaining terms being negligible at low intensities in both cases. By expanding the logic somewhat, in the manner of second quantization, we are able also to give an account of interaction terms in the Yang–Mills case. This shows that there is a common form ancestral to all the Lagrangians of the standard model in the ensemble of “evolutionary” trees provided by deductions in a certain clearly specified logic, and reveals the differences between the Yang–Mills and gravitational kinetic terms. Thus we acquire a new paradigm for “unification” of the fundamental forces at the level of the underlying logic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算标准模型的拉格朗日量
普通量子逻辑具有众所周知的病态,使得它对计算的目的毫无用处。然而,基于吉拉德线性逻辑变体的松散相关逻辑已被发现在量子计算的背景下很有用。从某种意义上说,这种计算方案的使用提供了一种元水平的观点,以了解某些表达的可能来源,否则就不明显了。既然这样的逻辑被假定封装了量子“资源”的基本行为,我们可以考虑这个问题,即这种逻辑或计算方法是否与量子物理学本身有任何关系。在本文中,我们讨论某些基本拉格朗日量的起源问题,即那些出现在标准模型中的拉格朗日量。如果逻辑中的一组特定的句子被添加到逻辑的公理集中,那么产生的结构通常被逻辑学家称为理论。在本文中,我们将介绍这种逻辑的一个版本,并推导出它的一些物理分支。也就是说,我们将证明有一种单一类型的序列,当将其作为一个公理添加到当前的逻辑微积分中时,在这样定义的理论中产生的序列,其首要项与杨-米尔斯拉格朗日密度(包括规范固定项)和爱因斯坦-希尔伯特拉格朗日密度完全匹配,其余大部分项在两种情况下的低强度下都可以忽略不计。通过对逻辑进行某种程度的扩展,以二次量子化的方式,我们也能够给出Yang-Mills情况下相互作用项的解释。这表明,在一定明确规定的逻辑下,由演绎法提供的“进化”树的集合中,所有标准模型的拉格朗日量都有一个共同的祖先形式,并揭示了杨-米尔斯和引力动力学项之间的区别。因此,我们获得了一个在底层逻辑层面上基本力“统一”的新范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Logic
Journal of Applied Logic COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
1.13
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Formal analysis of SEU mitigation for early dependability and performability analysis of FPGA-based space applications Logical Investigations on Assertion and Denial Natural deduction for bi-intuitionistic logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1