Is Central Asia the eastern outpost of the Neandertal range? A reassessment of the Teshik-Tash child.

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American journal of physical anthropology Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.20897
Michelle Glantz, Sheela Athreya, Terrence Ritzman
{"title":"Is Central Asia the eastern outpost of the Neandertal range? A reassessment of the Teshik-Tash child.","authors":"Michelle Glantz, Sheela Athreya, Terrence Ritzman","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.20897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its discovery in southeastern Uzbekistan in 1938, the Teshik-Tash child has been considered a Neandertal. Its affinity is important to studies of Late Pleistocene hominin growth and development as well as interpretations of the Central Asian Middle Paleolithic and the geographic distribution of Neandertals. A close examination of the original Russian monograph reveals the incompleteness of key morphologies associated with the cranial base and face and problems with the reconstruction of the Teshik-Tash cranium, making its Neandertal attribution less certain than previously assumed. This study reassesses the Neandertal status of Teshik-Tash 1 by comparing it to a sample of Neandertal, Middle and Upper Paleolithic modern humans, and recent human sub-adults. Separate examinations of the cranium and mandible are conducted using multinomial logistic regression and discriminant function analysis to assess group membership. Results of the cranial analysis group Teshik-Tash with Upper Paleolithic modern humans when variables are not size-standardized, while results of the mandibular analysis place the specimen with recent modern humans for both raw and size-standardized data. Although these results are influenced by limitations related to the incomplete nature of the comparative sample, they suggest that the morphology of Teshik-Tash 1 as expressed in craniometrics is equivocal. Although, further quantitative studies as well as additional sub-adult fossil finds from this region are needed to ascertain the morphological pattern of this specimen specifically, and Central Asian Middle Paleolithic hominins in general, these results challenge current characterizations of this territory as the eastern boundary of the Neandertal range during the Late Pleistocene.</p>","PeriodicalId":7587,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physical anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its discovery in southeastern Uzbekistan in 1938, the Teshik-Tash child has been considered a Neandertal. Its affinity is important to studies of Late Pleistocene hominin growth and development as well as interpretations of the Central Asian Middle Paleolithic and the geographic distribution of Neandertals. A close examination of the original Russian monograph reveals the incompleteness of key morphologies associated with the cranial base and face and problems with the reconstruction of the Teshik-Tash cranium, making its Neandertal attribution less certain than previously assumed. This study reassesses the Neandertal status of Teshik-Tash 1 by comparing it to a sample of Neandertal, Middle and Upper Paleolithic modern humans, and recent human sub-adults. Separate examinations of the cranium and mandible are conducted using multinomial logistic regression and discriminant function analysis to assess group membership. Results of the cranial analysis group Teshik-Tash with Upper Paleolithic modern humans when variables are not size-standardized, while results of the mandibular analysis place the specimen with recent modern humans for both raw and size-standardized data. Although these results are influenced by limitations related to the incomplete nature of the comparative sample, they suggest that the morphology of Teshik-Tash 1 as expressed in craniometrics is equivocal. Although, further quantitative studies as well as additional sub-adult fossil finds from this region are needed to ascertain the morphological pattern of this specimen specifically, and Central Asian Middle Paleolithic hominins in general, these results challenge current characterizations of this territory as the eastern boundary of the Neandertal range during the Late Pleistocene.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中亚是尼安德特尔山脉的东部前哨吗?对特谢克-塔什儿童的重新评估。
自 1938 年在乌兹别克斯坦东南部发现 Teshik-Tash 儿童以来,它一直被认为是尼安德特人。它的亲缘关系对于研究晚更新世人类的生长发育以及解释中亚旧石器时代中期和尼安德特人的地理分布非常重要。对俄罗斯原版专著的仔细研究表明,与颅底和面部相关的关键形态不完整,Teshik-Tash 头骨的重建也存在问题,因此其尼安德特人的归属没有以前假设的那么确定。本研究通过将 Teshik-Tash 1 与尼安德特人、旧石器时代中期和上部现代人以及近代亚成人样本进行比较,重新评估了它的尼安德特人身份。利用多项式逻辑回归和判别函数分析法对颅骨和下颌骨分别进行检查,以评估其群体成员身份。颅骨分析的结果表明,当变量的尺寸未标准化时,Teshik-Tash 属于旧石器时代上层现代人,而下颌骨分析的结果表明,无论是原始数据还是尺寸标准化数据,该标本都属于近代现代人。虽然这些结果受到比较样本不完整的局限性的影响,但它们表明,颅骨计量学所表达的 Teshik-Tash 1 的形态是不确定的。尽管还需要进一步的定量研究以及从该地区发现更多的亚成体化石来确定该标本的形态模式,以及整个中亚旧石器时代中期人类的形态模式,但这些结果对目前将该地区描述为更新世晚期尼安德特人分布区东部边界的观点提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physical Anthropology (AJPA) is the official journal of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. The Journal is published monthly in three quarterly volumes. In addition, two supplements appear on an annual basis, the Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, which publishes major review articles, and the Annual Meeting Issue, containing the Scientific Program of the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and abstracts of posters and podium presentations. The Yearbook of Physical Anthropology has its own editor, appointed by the Association, and is handled independently of the AJPA. As measured by impact factor, the AJPA is among the top journals listed in the anthropology category by the Social Science Citation Index. The reputation of the AJPA as the leading publication in physical anthropology is built on its century-long record of publishing high quality scientific articles in a wide range of topics.
期刊最新文献
“To honor and remember”: An ethical awakening to African American remains in museums Occipital hemi-bun development and shape covariation in a longitudinal extant human growth sample. Abstracts of the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, March 25-28, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri. Race, Monogamy, and Other Lies They Told You: Busting Myths About Human Nature. Edited by Agustín Fuentes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 2012. 274 pp. ISBN 978‐0‐520‐26971‐2. $27.50 (hardcover). Disease In London, 1st—19th Centuries: An Illustrated Guide To Diagnosis. Monograph 56. Edited by Don Walker. London: Museum of London Archeology. 2012. 287 pp. ISBN 978‐1‐907586‐10‐1. £28.00 (hardcover).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1