{"title":"In situ spectroscopy and diffraction to look inside the next generation of gas diffusion and zero-gap electrolyzers","authors":"Jan den Hollander, Ward van der Stam","doi":"10.1016/j.coche.2023.100979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electrolyzers allow for the sustainable conversion of chemical waste (e.g. nitrous oxides, NO<sub>x</sub>, or carbon dioxide, CO<sub>2</sub>) into valuable chemicals or building blocks (e.g. ammonia or hydrocarbons). There is a constant search for new and improved materials (electrocatalysts) that can facilitate these complex chemical reactions with optimized activity, selectivity, and stability. In order for electrolyzers to become economically feasible, it is of utmost importance that they perform at high current density >100 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> (activity), since this scales with chemical reaction rate. However, if high current density is only achieved for a short period of time (stability), the electrolyzer has to be regenerated, which is a costly endeavor. For this purpose, chemical engineers have focused on gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) or membrane electrode assemblies (MEA) in recent years, but these cell configurations are prone to rapid deactivation and salting. <em>In situ</em> spectroscopy and diffraction techniques can shed light on the parameters that influence catalyst (de)activation, but application of the technique of choice depends heavily on the reaction conditions and hence is not straightforwardly applied to electrolyzers that operate at high current density. This review addresses the recent developments within the community for <em>in situ</em> characterization of GDE and MEA electrolyzers, and opportunities for future studies are highlighted, which are aimed to stimulate discussion and advancement of the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":292,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100979"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339823000837/pdfft?md5=56788ecb647425621bfd80eb2aabb107&pid=1-s2.0-S2211339823000837-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339823000837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electrolyzers allow for the sustainable conversion of chemical waste (e.g. nitrous oxides, NOx, or carbon dioxide, CO2) into valuable chemicals or building blocks (e.g. ammonia or hydrocarbons). There is a constant search for new and improved materials (electrocatalysts) that can facilitate these complex chemical reactions with optimized activity, selectivity, and stability. In order for electrolyzers to become economically feasible, it is of utmost importance that they perform at high current density >100 mA/cm2 (activity), since this scales with chemical reaction rate. However, if high current density is only achieved for a short period of time (stability), the electrolyzer has to be regenerated, which is a costly endeavor. For this purpose, chemical engineers have focused on gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) or membrane electrode assemblies (MEA) in recent years, but these cell configurations are prone to rapid deactivation and salting. In situ spectroscopy and diffraction techniques can shed light on the parameters that influence catalyst (de)activation, but application of the technique of choice depends heavily on the reaction conditions and hence is not straightforwardly applied to electrolyzers that operate at high current density. This review addresses the recent developments within the community for in situ characterization of GDE and MEA electrolyzers, and opportunities for future studies are highlighted, which are aimed to stimulate discussion and advancement of the field.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering is devoted to bringing forth short and focused review articles written by experts on current advances in different areas of chemical engineering. Only invited review articles will be published.
The goals of each review article in Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering are:
1. To acquaint the reader/researcher with the most important recent papers in the given topic.
2. To provide the reader with the views/opinions of the expert in each topic.
The reviews are short (about 2500 words or 5-10 printed pages with figures) and serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, teachers, professionals and students. The reviews also aim to stimulate exchange of ideas among experts.
Themed sections:
Each review will focus on particular aspects of one of the following themed sections of chemical engineering:
1. Nanotechnology
2. Energy and environmental engineering
3. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering
4. Biological engineering (covering tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug delivery)
5. Separation engineering (covering membrane technologies, adsorbents, desalination, distillation etc.)
6. Materials engineering (covering biomaterials, inorganic especially ceramic materials, nanostructured materials).
7. Process systems engineering
8. Reaction engineering and catalysis.