{"title":"Understanding of chemical looping with autothermal operation","authors":"Zhen Fan, Neng Huang, Kunlei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.coche.2023.100970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is under development for fuel combustion, an art of technology in terms of less energy penalty for CO<sub>2</sub> removal. In addition to the oxygen carrier (OC) development, the autothermal operation is another key for the success of CLC, which is mainly determined by a difference of heat of combustion per mole O<sub>2</sub> between the fuel and oxygen carrier (dQ<sub>Fuel-OC</sub>). Ideally, the developed OC should have dQ<sub>Fuel-OC</sub> > 0, that is, the coupling of OC-fuel needs to be evaluated at the beginning to check the feasibility of autothermal operation.</p><p>The advantages and developments of CLC have been well-reviewed by Henderson and recently by Lyngfelt, Abuelgasim et al., Abdalla et al., and Adánez-Rubio et al., as well as by a handbook. In this communication, the feasibility of autothermal operation of CLC is systematically analyzed. The selection of OC to couple with fuel, capacity of OC, impact of OC support materials, circulation rate of OC (mass and heat), heat-up of feeds, impact of aeration gas, reaction kinetics, and operation of CLC are discussed, aimed at providing some insights and approaches in the development of OC, which is, in any situation, fuel-determined. More attention is needed so that the CLC process can be operated in an autothermal mode and scaled up commercially in the future for CO<sub>2</sub> removal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":292,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100970"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339823000746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is under development for fuel combustion, an art of technology in terms of less energy penalty for CO2 removal. In addition to the oxygen carrier (OC) development, the autothermal operation is another key for the success of CLC, which is mainly determined by a difference of heat of combustion per mole O2 between the fuel and oxygen carrier (dQFuel-OC). Ideally, the developed OC should have dQFuel-OC > 0, that is, the coupling of OC-fuel needs to be evaluated at the beginning to check the feasibility of autothermal operation.
The advantages and developments of CLC have been well-reviewed by Henderson and recently by Lyngfelt, Abuelgasim et al., Abdalla et al., and Adánez-Rubio et al., as well as by a handbook. In this communication, the feasibility of autothermal operation of CLC is systematically analyzed. The selection of OC to couple with fuel, capacity of OC, impact of OC support materials, circulation rate of OC (mass and heat), heat-up of feeds, impact of aeration gas, reaction kinetics, and operation of CLC are discussed, aimed at providing some insights and approaches in the development of OC, which is, in any situation, fuel-determined. More attention is needed so that the CLC process can be operated in an autothermal mode and scaled up commercially in the future for CO2 removal.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering is devoted to bringing forth short and focused review articles written by experts on current advances in different areas of chemical engineering. Only invited review articles will be published.
The goals of each review article in Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering are:
1. To acquaint the reader/researcher with the most important recent papers in the given topic.
2. To provide the reader with the views/opinions of the expert in each topic.
The reviews are short (about 2500 words or 5-10 printed pages with figures) and serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, teachers, professionals and students. The reviews also aim to stimulate exchange of ideas among experts.
Themed sections:
Each review will focus on particular aspects of one of the following themed sections of chemical engineering:
1. Nanotechnology
2. Energy and environmental engineering
3. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering
4. Biological engineering (covering tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug delivery)
5. Separation engineering (covering membrane technologies, adsorbents, desalination, distillation etc.)
6. Materials engineering (covering biomaterials, inorganic especially ceramic materials, nanostructured materials).
7. Process systems engineering
8. Reaction engineering and catalysis.