Rewrite rules for CTL*

Q1 Mathematics Journal of Applied Logic Pub Date : 2017-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jal.2016.12.003
John C. McCabe-Dansted, Mark Reynolds
{"title":"Rewrite rules for CTL*","authors":"John C. McCabe-Dansted,&nbsp;Mark Reynolds","doi":"10.1016/j.jal.2016.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A number of procedures for checking the satisfiability of formulas in the important branching time temporal logic CTL* have recently been proposed.</p><p>In this paper we develop techniques to support such reasoning based on rewrite rules. We consider how to automatically generate and quickly validate such rewrites. The techniques are based on use of so-called non-local and bundled variants of computation tree logics.</p><p>We show that such rules can quickly simplify CTL* formulas. These simplified formulas are shorter and easier to reason with using existing decision procedures for CTL*, as demonstrated by significant speed-ups across a wide range of benchmark formulas.</p><p>In this paper we provide both an Associative Commutative sound, confluent and terminating term rewrite system as well as a simple greedy rewrite system. We test them on a useful set of benchmarks. There are practical applications for theorem-proving and model-checking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Logic","volume":"21 ","pages":"Pages 24-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jal.2016.12.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570868316301252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A number of procedures for checking the satisfiability of formulas in the important branching time temporal logic CTL* have recently been proposed.

In this paper we develop techniques to support such reasoning based on rewrite rules. We consider how to automatically generate and quickly validate such rewrites. The techniques are based on use of so-called non-local and bundled variants of computation tree logics.

We show that such rules can quickly simplify CTL* formulas. These simplified formulas are shorter and easier to reason with using existing decision procedures for CTL*, as demonstrated by significant speed-ups across a wide range of benchmark formulas.

In this paper we provide both an Associative Commutative sound, confluent and terminating term rewrite system as well as a simple greedy rewrite system. We test them on a useful set of benchmarks. There are practical applications for theorem-proving and model-checking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重写CTL*的规则
最近提出了一些检验重要分支时间时间逻辑CTL*中公式可满足性的方法。在本文中,我们开发了基于重写规则的技术来支持这种推理。我们将考虑如何自动生成并快速验证这样的重写。这些技术基于所谓的计算树逻辑的非局部和捆绑变体的使用。我们证明了这些规则可以快速简化CTL*公式。这些简化的公式更短,更容易使用CTL*的现有决策程序进行推理,正如在广泛的基准公式中显着加速所证明的那样。本文给出了一个结合交换音、合流和终止项重写系统以及一个简单的贪婪重写系统。我们在一组有用的基准上对它们进行测试。对于定理证明和模型检查有实际的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Logic
Journal of Applied Logic COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
1.13
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Formal analysis of SEU mitigation for early dependability and performability analysis of FPGA-based space applications Logical Investigations on Assertion and Denial Natural deduction for bi-intuitionistic logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1