Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees.

IF 17 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS American Journal of Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172
Hilary Mabel, Joshua S Crites, Thomas V Cunningham, Jordan Potter
{"title":"Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees.","authors":"Hilary Mabel, Joshua S Crites, Thomas V Cunningham, Jordan Potter","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in ethics programs with one or more professional clinical ethicists, ethics committees should be dissolved when they fail to meet minimum standards of effectiveness. The authors outline several criteria for assessing effectiveness, describe the benefits of a model that places primary responsibility for ethics work with professional clinical ethicists-the <i>PCE-primary model</i>, and offer suggestions for alternative ethics program structures that empower healthcare professionals to contribute to ethics work in ways more tailored to their strengths and skills while minimizing the shortcomings of ethics committees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50962,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"55-70"},"PeriodicalIF":17.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in ethics programs with one or more professional clinical ethicists, ethics committees should be dissolved when they fail to meet minimum standards of effectiveness. The authors outline several criteria for assessing effectiveness, describe the benefits of a model that places primary responsibility for ethics work with professional clinical ethicists-the PCE-primary model, and offer suggestions for alternative ethics program structures that empower healthcare professionals to contribute to ethics work in ways more tailored to their strengths and skills while minimizing the shortcomings of ethics committees.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在没有伦理委员会的情况下重新构想蓬勃发展的伦理项目。
随着临床伦理学的日益专业化,一些医院和卫生系统利用伦理委员会和专业临床伦理学家来解决他们的伦理需求。根据对伦理委员会的历史批评和他们自己的经验,作者认为,在一个或多个专业临床伦理学家的伦理项目中,当伦理委员会未能达到最低的有效性标准时,应该解散伦理委员会。作者概述了评估有效性的几个标准,描述了将伦理工作的主要责任交给专业临床伦理学家的模型(PCE-primary模型)的好处,并提供了替代伦理计划结构的建议,这些结构使医疗保健专业人员能够以更适合他们的优势和技能的方式为伦理工作做出贡献,同时最大限度地减少伦理委员会的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Bioethics
American Journal of Bioethics 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB) is a renowned global publication focused on bioethics. It tackles pressing ethical challenges in the realm of health sciences. With a commitment to the original vision of bioethics, AJOB explores the social consequences of advancements in biomedicine. It sparks meaningful discussions that have proved invaluable to a wide range of professionals, including judges, senators, journalists, scholars, and educators. AJOB covers various areas of interest, such as the ethical implications of clinical research, ensuring access to healthcare services, and the responsible handling of medical records and data. The journal welcomes contributions in the form of target articles presenting original research, open peer commentaries facilitating a dialogue, book reviews, and responses to open peer commentaries. By presenting insightful and authoritative content, AJOB continues to shape the field of bioethics and engage diverse stakeholders in crucial conversations about the intersection of medicine, ethics, and society.
期刊最新文献
Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees. Conscientious Objection to Aggressive Interventions for Patients in a Vegetative State. Hippocratic Beneficence: The Ethical Grounding of Remedial Germline Editing. Balancing Transparency and Trust: Reevaluating AI Disclosure in Healthcare. Beyond Disclosure: Rethinking Patient Consent and AI Accountability in Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1