Meetings and individual work during the workday: Examining their interdependent impact on knowledge workers' energy.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Applied Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1037/apl0001091
Chen Zhang, Gretchen M Spreitzer, Zhaodong Alan Qiu
{"title":"Meetings and individual work during the workday: Examining their interdependent impact on knowledge workers' energy.","authors":"Chen Zhang,&nbsp;Gretchen M Spreitzer,&nbsp;Zhaodong Alan Qiu","doi":"10.1037/apl0001091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An important issue that has received little attention to date is how different types of work activities may interplay to influence workday energy, a critical resource for individuals' performance at work. Integrating the notion of workday design with event system theory, we examine two prominent types of work activities for knowledge workers-meetings and individual work-to investigate how <i>time allocation</i> and <i>pressure complementarity</i> between them influence workday energy. We conducted two experience sampling studies, one with 245 knowledge workers from diverse organizations and the other with 167 employees from two technology companies. We found a time allocation effect, such that for a given period of the workday (i.e., the morning or the afternoon), the greater the proportion of time a knowledge worker spent in meetings relative to individual work, the less this person engaged in microbreak activities for replenishment during that period. The reduction in microbreak activities, in turn, harmed energy. We also found a pressure complementarity effect in the morning (though not in the afternoon), such that when a meeting involved low pressure in the presence of high-pressure individual work or vice versa, when a meeting involved high pressure in the presence of low-pressure individual work, such complementarity benefited energy. Overall, this research advances our understanding of how everyday work activities relate to knowledge workers' energy and sheds new light on the issue of work and workday designs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1640-1661"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important issue that has received little attention to date is how different types of work activities may interplay to influence workday energy, a critical resource for individuals' performance at work. Integrating the notion of workday design with event system theory, we examine two prominent types of work activities for knowledge workers-meetings and individual work-to investigate how time allocation and pressure complementarity between them influence workday energy. We conducted two experience sampling studies, one with 245 knowledge workers from diverse organizations and the other with 167 employees from two technology companies. We found a time allocation effect, such that for a given period of the workday (i.e., the morning or the afternoon), the greater the proportion of time a knowledge worker spent in meetings relative to individual work, the less this person engaged in microbreak activities for replenishment during that period. The reduction in microbreak activities, in turn, harmed energy. We also found a pressure complementarity effect in the morning (though not in the afternoon), such that when a meeting involved low pressure in the presence of high-pressure individual work or vice versa, when a meeting involved high pressure in the presence of low-pressure individual work, such complementarity benefited energy. Overall, this research advances our understanding of how everyday work activities relate to knowledge workers' energy and sheds new light on the issue of work and workday designs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作日的会议和个人工作:研究它们对知识工作者能量的相互依存影响。
到目前为止,一个很少受到关注的重要问题是,不同类型的工作活动如何相互作用,影响工作日的能量,这是个人工作表现的关键资源。将工作日设计的概念与事件系统理论相结合,我们研究了知识工人会议和个人工作中两种突出的工作活动类型,以研究它们之间的时间分配和压力互补性如何影响工作日的能量。我们进行了两项经验抽样研究,一项是来自不同组织的245名知识工作者,另一项是两家科技公司的167名员工。我们发现了一种时间分配效应,即在工作日的特定时间段(即上午或下午),知识工作者在会议上花费的时间相对于个人工作的比例越大,此人在这段时间内从事的微防护活动就越少。微生物防护活动的减少反过来又损害了能源。我们还在上午(尽管不是下午)发现了压力互补效应,因此,当一个会议在有高压个人工作的情况下涉及低压时,反之亦然,当一次会议在有低压个人工作的条件下涉及高压时,这种互补性有利于能量。总的来说,这项研究促进了我们对日常工作活动与知识型员工能量之间关系的理解,并为工作和工作日设计问题提供了新的线索。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including: 1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses). 2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research. 3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
期刊最新文献
Prospects for reducing group mean differences on cognitive tests via item selection strategies. Self-promotion in entrepreneurship: A driver for proactive adaptation. Coping with work-nonwork stressors over time: A person-centered, multistudy integration of coping breadth and depth. A person-centered approach to behaving badly at work: An examination of workplace deviance patterns. How perceived lack of benevolence harms trust of artificial intelligence management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1