Who counts when health counts? A case-study of multi-stakeholder initiative to promote value-creation in Swedish healthcare.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Management Research Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/09514848221100751
Leonard Tragl, Carl Savage, Magna Andreen-Sachs, Mats Brommels
{"title":"Who counts when health counts? A case-study of multi-stakeholder initiative to promote value-creation in Swedish healthcare.","authors":"Leonard Tragl,&nbsp;Carl Savage,&nbsp;Magna Andreen-Sachs,&nbsp;Mats Brommels","doi":"10.1177/09514848221100751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A European initiative to design a \"medical information framework\" conceptualised how multiple stakeholders join in collaborative networks to create innovations. It conveyed the ways in which value is created and captured by stakeholders. We applied those insights to analyse a multi-stakeholder initiative to promote improvement of Swedish healthcare. Our longitudinal case study covered totally fifty stakeholders involved in a national project, aiming at designing a system to support value-based evaluation and reimbursement. During the project the focus changed from reimbursement to benchmarking. Sophisticated case-mix adjusting algorithms were designed to make outcome comparisons valid and incorporated in a software platform enabling detailed analysis of eight patient groups across seven regional health authorities. Those were deliverables demonstrating value created. However, the project was unable to transfer the system into routine use in the regions, a failed value-capture. The initial success was promoted by collaborative processes in diagnosis-specific working groups of well-informed and engaged professionals. The change of focus away from reimbursement decreased the involvement among health authorities, leaving no centrally placed persons to push for implementation. It highlights the importance of health professionals as the key stakeholder, who has both the know-how instrumental to creating an innovation, and the local involvement guaranteeing its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080372/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848221100751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A European initiative to design a "medical information framework" conceptualised how multiple stakeholders join in collaborative networks to create innovations. It conveyed the ways in which value is created and captured by stakeholders. We applied those insights to analyse a multi-stakeholder initiative to promote improvement of Swedish healthcare. Our longitudinal case study covered totally fifty stakeholders involved in a national project, aiming at designing a system to support value-based evaluation and reimbursement. During the project the focus changed from reimbursement to benchmarking. Sophisticated case-mix adjusting algorithms were designed to make outcome comparisons valid and incorporated in a software platform enabling detailed analysis of eight patient groups across seven regional health authorities. Those were deliverables demonstrating value created. However, the project was unable to transfer the system into routine use in the regions, a failed value-capture. The initial success was promoted by collaborative processes in diagnosis-specific working groups of well-informed and engaged professionals. The change of focus away from reimbursement decreased the involvement among health authorities, leaving no centrally placed persons to push for implementation. It highlights the importance of health professionals as the key stakeholder, who has both the know-how instrumental to creating an innovation, and the local involvement guaranteeing its implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当健康重要时,谁重要?促进瑞典医疗保健领域创造价值的多方利益相关者倡议的案例研究。
一项旨在设计“医疗信息框架”的欧洲倡议概念化了多个利益相关者如何加入协作网络以创造创新。它传达了利益相关者创造和获取价值的方式。我们将这些见解应用于分析多方利益相关者倡议,以促进瑞典医疗保健的改善。我们的纵向案例研究涵盖了参与国家项目的50个利益相关者,旨在设计一个支持基于价值的评估和报销的系统。在项目期间,重点从报销转变为基准。设计了复杂的病例组合调整算法,使结果比较有效,并将其纳入软件平台,以便对七个地区卫生当局的八个患者组进行详细分析。这些是展示创造价值的交付物。然而,该项目无法将该系统转化为该地区的日常使用,这是一个失败的价值获取。由消息灵通和敬业的专业人员组成的特定诊断工作组的协作进程促进了初步的成功。将重点从报销转移,减少了卫生当局的参与,没有中央人员来推动实施。它强调了卫生专业人员作为关键利益攸关方的重要性,他们既拥有创造创新的专门知识,又有地方参与保证其实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
An exploration of factors leading to readiness for organizational health literacy change in community-based health organizations. The (very real) risk of irrelevance, and the great opportunity. Financial management, efficiency, and care quality: A systematic review in the context of Health 4.0. The impact of policy and technology infrastructure on telehealth utilization. Factors influencing use of eHealth services during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1