Evaluation of the Relative Frequency of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Patients with Recurrent Breast Cancer Compared with Patients with Nonrecurrent Breast Cancer.

Reza Eshraghi Samani, Masoumeh Safaee, Pardis Nematollahi, Babak Amraei
{"title":"Evaluation of the Relative Frequency of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Patients with Recurrent Breast Cancer Compared with Patients with Nonrecurrent Breast Cancer.","authors":"Reza Eshraghi Samani,&nbsp;Masoumeh Safaee,&nbsp;Pardis Nematollahi,&nbsp;Babak Amraei","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_381_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The roles of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in breast cancer and breast lymphoma by transfecting EBV DNA have been indicated in different studies, but few investigations have been conducted on its roles in recurrence of breast cancer. Here, we aimed to evaluate the roles of EBV in recurrent breast cancer tissue.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional retrospective study that was performed in 2020-2021 in Isfahan on patients with breast cancer. The study population consisted of 30 tissue samples from recurrent breast cancer and 30 samples from nonrecurrent breast cancer. We collected demographic data of patients including age using a checklist. Other collected data were type of cancer, stages of cancer, tumor size in greatest dimension, lymph node involvements, and presence of metastasis. Furthermore, we evaluated all of the pathology samples from both groups for the presence of DNA of EBV and compared the data of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DNA of EBV was positive in 8 patients of the relapsed group (26.6%) and 7 patients in the nonrelapsed patients (23.3%). There was no significant difference between two groups regarding positive DNA of EBV (<i>P</i> = 0.39). There were no significant differences between two groups of positive DNA of EBV with and without recurrent breast cancer regarding type of cancer (<i>P</i> = 0.63), stage of cancer (<i>P</i> = 0.19), tumor size in greatest dimension (<i>P</i> = 0.31), mean lymph node involvement (<i>P</i> = 0.27), number of lymph node involvement (<i>P</i> = 0.43), and metastasis (<i>P</i> = 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBV might have no significant role in recurrence of breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/56/ABR-12-34.PMC10086641.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_381_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The roles of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in breast cancer and breast lymphoma by transfecting EBV DNA have been indicated in different studies, but few investigations have been conducted on its roles in recurrence of breast cancer. Here, we aimed to evaluate the roles of EBV in recurrent breast cancer tissue.

Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional retrospective study that was performed in 2020-2021 in Isfahan on patients with breast cancer. The study population consisted of 30 tissue samples from recurrent breast cancer and 30 samples from nonrecurrent breast cancer. We collected demographic data of patients including age using a checklist. Other collected data were type of cancer, stages of cancer, tumor size in greatest dimension, lymph node involvements, and presence of metastasis. Furthermore, we evaluated all of the pathology samples from both groups for the presence of DNA of EBV and compared the data of both groups.

Results: The DNA of EBV was positive in 8 patients of the relapsed group (26.6%) and 7 patients in the nonrelapsed patients (23.3%). There was no significant difference between two groups regarding positive DNA of EBV (P = 0.39). There were no significant differences between two groups of positive DNA of EBV with and without recurrent breast cancer regarding type of cancer (P = 0.63), stage of cancer (P = 0.19), tumor size in greatest dimension (P = 0.31), mean lymph node involvement (P = 0.27), number of lymph node involvement (P = 0.43), and metastasis (P = 0.69).

Conclusion: EBV might have no significant role in recurrence of breast cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性乳腺癌患者与非复发性乳腺癌患者Epstein-Barr病毒感染相对频率的比较
背景:不同的研究表明eb病毒(EBV)通过转染EBV DNA在乳腺癌和乳腺淋巴瘤中的作用,但关于其在乳腺癌复发中的作用的研究很少。在这里,我们的目的是评估EBV在复发性乳腺癌组织中的作用。材料和方法:这是一项横断面回顾性研究,于2020-2021年在伊斯法罕对乳腺癌患者进行研究。研究人群包括30个来自复发性乳腺癌的组织样本和30个来自非复发性乳腺癌的样本。我们使用检查表收集患者的人口统计数据,包括年龄。其他收集的数据包括癌症类型、癌症分期、肿瘤最大尺寸、淋巴结受累情况和转移情况。此外,我们评估了来自两组的所有病理样本是否存在EBV DNA,并比较了两组的数据。结果:复发组EBV DNA阳性8例(26.6%),非复发组EBV DNA阳性7例(23.3%)。两组间EBV DNA阳性差异无统计学意义(P = 0.39)。两组EBV DNA阳性伴和不伴复发乳腺癌患者在肿瘤类型(P = 0.63)、肿瘤分期(P = 0.19)、肿瘤最大尺寸(P = 0.31)、平均淋巴结受累(P = 0.27)、淋巴结受累数(P = 0.43)、转移(P = 0.69)方面均无显著差异。结论:EBV在乳腺癌复发中可能无明显作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic Sulfoquinovosyl Glycerols from the Seaweed Sargassum Angustifolium from Persian Gulf Effect of Silybum Marianum on Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity with Cisplatin Evaluation of IP3R3 Gene Silencing Effect on Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH) Enzyme Activity in Breast Cancer Cells with and Without Estrogen Receptor Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1