Evaluating the value of progressive muscle relaxation therapy for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model.

IF 6.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1080/02648725.2023.2204709
Xiaoxin Chen, Guoliang Chen, Yanhong Zhao, Qunying Chen, Junlin Huang, Guanqiong Hu
{"title":"Evaluating the value of progressive muscle relaxation therapy for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model.","authors":"Xiaoxin Chen, Guoliang Chen, Yanhong Zhao, Qunying Chen, Junlin Huang, Guanqiong Hu","doi":"10.1080/02648725.2023.2204709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluate the value of progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model. A total of 128 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent surgery were randomly assigned to undergo either conventional intervention (conventional intervention group, <i>n</i> = 64) or conventional intervention combined with PMR (PMR group, <i>n</i> = 64). Perioperative anxiety level, stress level and lumbar function were compared between the two groups and compared pain between the two groups before and 1 week and 1 and 3 months after surgery. After 3 months, no one was lost to follow-up. At 1 day before surgery and 3 days after surgery, Self-rating Anxiety Scale score in the PMR group was significantly lower than that in the conventional intervention group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). At 30 min before surgery, heart rate and systolic blood pressure in the PMR group were significantly lower than those in the conventional intervention group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of subjective symptoms, clinical signs and restrictions on activities of daily living were significantly higher in the PMR group than those in the conventional intervention group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Visual Analogue Scale score in the PMR group was significantly lower than that in the conventional intervention group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). The amplitude of change in VAS score in the PMR group was greater than that in the conventional intervention group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). PMR can relieve perioperative anxiety and stress in patients with lumbar disc herniation, reduce postoperative pain and improve lumbar function.</p>","PeriodicalId":55355,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"3988-3999"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2023.2204709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluate the value of progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model. A total of 128 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent surgery were randomly assigned to undergo either conventional intervention (conventional intervention group, n = 64) or conventional intervention combined with PMR (PMR group, n = 64). Perioperative anxiety level, stress level and lumbar function were compared between the two groups and compared pain between the two groups before and 1 week and 1 and 3 months after surgery. After 3 months, no one was lost to follow-up. At 1 day before surgery and 3 days after surgery, Self-rating Anxiety Scale score in the PMR group was significantly lower than that in the conventional intervention group (P < 0.05). At 30 min before surgery, heart rate and systolic blood pressure in the PMR group were significantly lower than those in the conventional intervention group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of subjective symptoms, clinical signs and restrictions on activities of daily living were significantly higher in the PMR group than those in the conventional intervention group (all P < 0.05). Visual Analogue Scale score in the PMR group was significantly lower than that in the conventional intervention group (all P < 0.05). The amplitude of change in VAS score in the PMR group was greater than that in the conventional intervention group (P < 0.05). PMR can relieve perioperative anxiety and stress in patients with lumbar disc herniation, reduce postoperative pain and improve lumbar function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于差异模型评估渐进式肌肉放松疗法对腰椎间盘突出症术后患者的价值。
我们根据差异模型评估了渐进式肌肉放松术(PMR)对腰椎间盘突出症术后患者的价值。共有 128 名腰椎间盘突出症患者接受了手术,他们被随机分配接受常规干预(常规干预组,64 人)或常规干预结合 PMR(PMR 组,64 人)。对两组患者围手术期的焦虑程度、压力水平和腰椎功能进行比较,并对两组患者术前、术后一周及术后1个月和3个月的疼痛情况进行比较。3 个月后,无人失去随访。在手术前 1 天和手术后 3 天,PMR 组的焦虑自评量表得分明显低于常规干预组(P P P P P P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews publishes major invited review articles covering important developments in industrial, agricultural and medical applications of biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
Application of Shouwu Yizhi prescription in decubation of patients with ischemic stroke. Analysis of non-targeted serum metabolomics in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperuricemia. Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholecystitis with gallstones. Evaluating the value of progressive muscle relaxation therapy for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model. Regulation of TREM2 on BV2 inflammation through PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1