Effects of different surgical modalities for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative erectile function: a systematic review and one-arm meta-analysis.

Abstract

Maintaining erectile function is an important quality of life issue for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, most existing studies are retrospective and inherently weak and cannot conclude which NS approach is most effective in restoring function in patients. We therefore performed a consistent and objective assessment of sexual function outcomes in RARP using different nerve-sparing methods to optimize postoperative outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed based on PRISMA and STROBE statement criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using StataMP software version 14. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. This single-arm meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 14 cohort studies with a total of 3756 patients. Our meta-analysis found that patients had the highest efficiency rate of 0.86 (0.78, 0.93) after the NS technique using the retrograde method. Overall, there are significant differences between RARP NS techniques and outcomes, and the ideal technical strategy to optimize outcomes remains controversial. However, there is consensus on the importance of careful separation, dissection of the NVB, reduction of traction and thermal injury, and preservation of the fascia around the prostate. We still need more well-designed randomized controlled trials with videos describing the details of the different surgical techniques before they can be replicated.