Assessment of thin bony structures using cone-beam computed tomography.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Angle Orthodontist Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.2319/090922-633.1
Camilla Lennholm, Anna Westerlund, Henrik Lund
{"title":"Assessment of thin bony structures using cone-beam computed tomography.","authors":"Camilla Lennholm, Anna Westerlund, Henrik Lund","doi":"10.2319/090922-633.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the validity and reliability of marginal bone level measurements on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of thin bony structures using various reconstruction techniques, two image resolutions, and two viewing modes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CBCT and histologic measurements of the buccal and lingual aspects of 16 anterior mandibular teeth from 6 human specimens were compared. Multiplanar (MPR) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions, standard and high resolutions, and gray scale and inverted gray scale viewing modes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validity of radiologic and histologic comparisons were highest using the standard protocol, MPR, and the inverted gray scale viewing mode (mean difference = 0.02 mm) and lowest using a high-resolution protocol and 3D-rendered images (mean difference = 1.10 mm). Mean differences were significant (P < .05) at the lingual surfaces for both reconstructions, viewing modes (MPR windows), and resolutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Varying the reconstruction technique and viewing mode does not improve the observer's ability to visualize thin bony structures in the anterior mandibular region. The use of 3D-reconstructed images should be avoided when thin cortical borders are suspected. The small difference when using a high-resolution protocol is unjustified due to the higher radiation dose required. Previous studies have focused on technical parameters; the present study explores the next link in the imaging chain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117211/pdf/i1945-7103-93-3-328.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/090922-633.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the validity and reliability of marginal bone level measurements on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of thin bony structures using various reconstruction techniques, two image resolutions, and two viewing modes.

Materials and methods: CBCT and histologic measurements of the buccal and lingual aspects of 16 anterior mandibular teeth from 6 human specimens were compared. Multiplanar (MPR) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions, standard and high resolutions, and gray scale and inverted gray scale viewing modes were assessed.

Results: Validity of radiologic and histologic comparisons were highest using the standard protocol, MPR, and the inverted gray scale viewing mode (mean difference = 0.02 mm) and lowest using a high-resolution protocol and 3D-rendered images (mean difference = 1.10 mm). Mean differences were significant (P < .05) at the lingual surfaces for both reconstructions, viewing modes (MPR windows), and resolutions.

Conclusions: Varying the reconstruction technique and viewing mode does not improve the observer's ability to visualize thin bony structures in the anterior mandibular region. The use of 3D-reconstructed images should be avoided when thin cortical borders are suspected. The small difference when using a high-resolution protocol is unjustified due to the higher radiation dose required. Previous studies have focused on technical parameters; the present study explores the next link in the imaging chain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估薄骨结构。
目的研究使用各种重建技术、两种图像分辨率和两种观察模式对薄骨结构的锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像进行边缘骨水平测量的有效性和可靠性:比较了来自 6 个人体标本的 16 颗下颌前牙的颊侧和舌侧的 CBCT 和组织学测量结果。对多平面(MPR)和三维(3D)重建、标准和高分辨率、灰度和倒灰度观察模式进行了评估:使用标准方案、MPR 和倒置灰度观察模式进行放射学和组织学比较的有效性最高(平均差异 = 0.02 毫米),而使用高分辨率方案和三维渲染图像进行比较的有效性最低(平均差异 = 1.10 毫米)。两种重建、观察模式(MPR 窗口)和分辨率在舌面的平均差异都很大(P < .05):结论:不同的重建技术和观察模式并不能提高观察者观察下颌前部薄骨结构的能力。当怀疑皮质边界较薄时,应避免使用三维重建图像。由于需要更高的辐射剂量,使用高分辨率方案时的微小差异是不合理的。以往的研究侧重于技术参数,本研究则探讨了成像链中的下一个环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Angle Orthodontist
Angle Orthodontist 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.
期刊最新文献
Does clinical experience affect the bracket bonding accuracy of guided bonding devices in vitro? Digitization and validation of the open bite checklist manifesto: a step toward artificial intelligence. The effect of vertical skeletal proportions on overbite changes in untreated adolescents: a longitudinal evaluation. Predicted overbite and overjet changes with the Invisalign appliance: a validation study. Responsiveness of three measurements in cone-beam computed tomography transverse analyses during both tooth-supported and mini-screw-assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1