Clinical outcomes of dose-escalated re-irradiation in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npac032
Corbin A Helis, Shih-Ni Prim, Christina K Cramer, Roy Strowd, Glenn J Lesser, Jaclyn J White, Stephen B Tatter, Adrian W Laxton, Christopher Whitlow, Hui-Wen Lo, Waldemar Debinski, James D Ververs, Paul J Black, Michael D Chan
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of dose-escalated re-irradiation in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.","authors":"Corbin A Helis,&nbsp;Shih-Ni Prim,&nbsp;Christina K Cramer,&nbsp;Roy Strowd,&nbsp;Glenn J Lesser,&nbsp;Jaclyn J White,&nbsp;Stephen B Tatter,&nbsp;Adrian W Laxton,&nbsp;Christopher Whitlow,&nbsp;Hui-Wen Lo,&nbsp;Waldemar Debinski,&nbsp;James D Ververs,&nbsp;Paul J Black,&nbsp;Michael D Chan","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas is a controversial treatment option with no clear standard dose or concurrent systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This series represents a single-institution retrospective review of patients treated with re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma. After 2012, patients were commonly offered concurrent bevacizumab as a cytoprotective agent against radiation necrosis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and progression-free survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with overall survival and progression-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2001 and 2021, 52 patients underwent re-irradiation for a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade glioma. 36 patients (69.2%) had a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma at the time of re-irradiation. The median BED10 (biological equivalent dose 10 Gy) of re-irradiation was 53.1 Gy. Twenty-one patients (40.4%) received concurrent bevacizumab with re-irradiation. Median survival for the entire cohort and for glioblastoma at the time of recurrence patients was 6.7 months and 6.0 months, respectively. For patients with glioblastoma at the time of recurrence, completing re-irradiation (HR 0.03, <i>P</i> < .001), use of concurrent bevacizumab (HR 0.3, <i>P</i> = .009), and the BED10 (HR 0.9, <i>P</i> = .005) were predictive of overall survival. Nine patients developed grade 3-5 toxicity; of these, 2 received concurrent bevacizumab and 7 did not (<i>P</i> = .15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High dose re-irradiation with concurrent bevacizumab is feasible in patients with recurrent gliomas. Concurrent bevacizumab and increasing radiation dose may improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"9 5","pages":"390-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9476990/pdf/npac032.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas is a controversial treatment option with no clear standard dose or concurrent systemic therapy.

Methods: This series represents a single-institution retrospective review of patients treated with re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma. After 2012, patients were commonly offered concurrent bevacizumab as a cytoprotective agent against radiation necrosis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and progression-free survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with overall survival and progression-free survival.

Results: Between 2001 and 2021, 52 patients underwent re-irradiation for a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade glioma. 36 patients (69.2%) had a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma at the time of re-irradiation. The median BED10 (biological equivalent dose 10 Gy) of re-irradiation was 53.1 Gy. Twenty-one patients (40.4%) received concurrent bevacizumab with re-irradiation. Median survival for the entire cohort and for glioblastoma at the time of recurrence patients was 6.7 months and 6.0 months, respectively. For patients with glioblastoma at the time of recurrence, completing re-irradiation (HR 0.03, P < .001), use of concurrent bevacizumab (HR 0.3, P = .009), and the BED10 (HR 0.9, P = .005) were predictive of overall survival. Nine patients developed grade 3-5 toxicity; of these, 2 received concurrent bevacizumab and 7 did not (P = .15).

Conclusion: High dose re-irradiation with concurrent bevacizumab is feasible in patients with recurrent gliomas. Concurrent bevacizumab and increasing radiation dose may improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级别胶质瘤复发患者剂量递增再照射的临床效果。
背景:复发性胶质瘤的再照射是一种有争议的治疗选择,没有明确的标准剂量或同步全身治疗。方法:本研究是对复发性高级别胶质瘤再放射治疗患者的单机构回顾性研究。2012年之后,患者通常同时使用贝伐单抗作为抗放射性坏死的细胞保护剂。Kaplan-Meier法估计总生存期和无进展生存期。Cox比例风险回归用于确定与总生存期和无进展生存期相关的因素。结果:2001年至2021年间,52名患者接受了复发性高级别胶质瘤的再放射治疗。36例(69.2%)患者在再照射时组织学诊断为胶质母细胞瘤。再照射的中位BED10(生物等效剂量10 Gy)为53.1 Gy。21例患者(40.4%)同时接受贝伐单抗再照射。整个队列和胶质母细胞瘤患者复发时的中位生存期分别为6.7个月和6.0个月。对于复发时的胶质母细胞瘤患者,完成再照射(HR 0.03, P < .001)、同时使用贝伐单抗(HR 0.3, P = .009)和BED10 (HR 0.9, P = .005)是总生存的预测指标。9例出现3-5级毒性;其中2例同时接受贝伐单抗治疗,7例未接受贝伐单抗治疗(P = 0.15)。结论:高剂量再照射并发贝伐单抗治疗复发性胶质瘤是可行的。同时增加贝伐单抗和放疗剂量可能提高复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
期刊最新文献
Erratum to: Glioma resource outreach with support: A program to identify and initiate supportive care interventions for unmet needs among adult lower-grade glioma patients. Well-intentioned is not always beneficial: Why we should question prescription habits. Long-term effects on fertility after central nervous system cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Socioeconomic driven disparities in neuro-oncology. Palliative care services in neuro-oncology: Mind the gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1