Addressing Burnout Among Women Residents: Results from Focus Group Discussions.

Jeff Norvell, Greg Unruh, Timothy Norvell, Kimberly J Templeton
{"title":"Addressing Burnout Among Women Residents: Results from Focus Group Discussions.","authors":"Jeff Norvell,&nbsp;Greg Unruh,&nbsp;Timothy Norvell,&nbsp;Kimberly J Templeton","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol16.18364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physician burnout has been described as more common among women than men. Even if there are no gender-based differences in prevalence, risk factors, such as work/home integration/conflict and gendered biases, likely differ. Prior administrations of an annual resident wellness survey at a single urban academic institution confirmed that rates of burnout were higher among women, especially during the PGY-2 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of focus groups of PGY-3 women residents across specialties were organized in 2019 at a single urban academic medical center. Given the number of participants, demographics were not collected to maintain participant anonymity. The moderator for all groups used a discussion guide consisting of eight open-ended questions based on a review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten residents agreed to participate in one of four hour-long focus group discussions. While the residents identified some factors that were not gender-specific, they also discussed issues that they faced as women in medicine, including needing to work harder to prove themselves and unconscious gendered biases from faculty and patients. The residents thought that their well-being would be improved if their training programs better understood the experiences and needs of women residents and recommended a series of interventions, including improved mentoring and networking opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions to improve well-being need to consider gender-based differences. While mentoring and networking can help all residents, these may be especially useful for women and should be considered as a component of an overarching plan to improve diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"83-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/60/16-83.PMC10136605.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.18364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physician burnout has been described as more common among women than men. Even if there are no gender-based differences in prevalence, risk factors, such as work/home integration/conflict and gendered biases, likely differ. Prior administrations of an annual resident wellness survey at a single urban academic institution confirmed that rates of burnout were higher among women, especially during the PGY-2 year.

Methods: A series of focus groups of PGY-3 women residents across specialties were organized in 2019 at a single urban academic medical center. Given the number of participants, demographics were not collected to maintain participant anonymity. The moderator for all groups used a discussion guide consisting of eight open-ended questions based on a review of the literature.

Results: Ten residents agreed to participate in one of four hour-long focus group discussions. While the residents identified some factors that were not gender-specific, they also discussed issues that they faced as women in medicine, including needing to work harder to prove themselves and unconscious gendered biases from faculty and patients. The residents thought that their well-being would be improved if their training programs better understood the experiences and needs of women residents and recommended a series of interventions, including improved mentoring and networking opportunities.

Conclusions: Interventions to improve well-being need to consider gender-based differences. While mentoring and networking can help all residents, these may be especially useful for women and should be considered as a component of an overarching plan to improve diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决女性住院医师的职业倦怠:焦点小组讨论的结果。
医生职业倦怠在女性中比男性更常见。即使患病率没有基于性别的差异,工作/家庭融合/冲突和性别偏见等风险因素也可能有所不同。先前在一个城市学术机构进行的年度居民健康调查证实,女性的倦怠率更高,特别是在PGY-2年。方法:2019年在一个城市学术医疗中心组织了一系列跨专业PGY-3女性住院医师焦点小组。考虑到参与者的数量,统计数据没有被收集,以保持参与者的匿名性。所有小组的主持人都使用了一个讨论指南,其中包括八个基于文献综述的开放式问题。结果:10位居民同意参加4个小时的焦点小组讨论。虽然住院医生们发现了一些与性别无关的因素,但她们也讨论了作为女性在医学领域面临的问题,包括需要更加努力地证明自己,以及来自教师和患者无意识的性别偏见。住院医生认为,如果他们的培训项目能更好地了解女性住院医生的经历和需求,并提出一系列干预措施,包括改善指导和交流机会,她们的幸福感就会得到改善。结论:改善幸福感的干预措施需要考虑基于性别的差异。虽然指导和网络可以帮助所有居民,但这些可能对女性特别有用,应该被视为改善多样性、公平、包容和归属感的总体计划的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Extensive Cholangiocarcinoma Highlighting Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment Evaluating the Long-Term Neurologic Sequelae Among Trauma Patients who Received Flexion-Extension Radiographs Ethical Obligation of Adequate Pain Management in Long Term Care Residents with Dementia Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer vs. Non-Cancer Patients A Case Report of Leclercia adecarboxylata Pyogenic Arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1