Associations Between Food Skills and Resilience in Adults Ages 18 to 45 in the USA During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020 April–June): A Brief Report

Savanna Phares, Andrea Irving, Maureen McCoy, Carol S. Johnston
{"title":"Associations Between Food Skills and Resilience in Adults Ages 18 to 45 in the USA During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020 April–June): A Brief Report","authors":"Savanna Phares,&nbsp;Andrea Irving,&nbsp;Maureen McCoy,&nbsp;Carol S. Johnston","doi":"10.1007/s42844-022-00087-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, there were limited options for eating away from home, obligating many US adults to prepare foods at home, a situation that provided an opportunity to examine relationships between food skills, resilience, and coping in the initial months of the pandemic. This research surveyed a convenience sample of adults (<i>n</i> = 134; 18–45 years of age) from the Phoenix Metropolitan area when a “stay at home” pandemic directive was mandated in the state of AZ. The study objective was to explore how food skills correlated to resilience and whether resilience directly related to the ability to manage oneself during this time. Previously validated measures for food skills and resiliency were utilized for the online questionnaire, which also included the question, “I was able to manage myself during the Coronavirus Pandemic.” The Spearman’s rank order correlation test and a linear, stepwise regression analysis were used to examine relationships between scores. Participants scored at the 77% percentile for total food skill proficiency, and at the 84th percentile for resilience. Both total food skills and resilience were correlated to the ability to self-manage during COVID-19 (<i>r</i> = 0.246 and <i>r</i> = 0.444, respectively; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.004). The stepwise linear regression model retained only the food skill domain “food selection and planning” as a significant predictor of resilience (standardized coefficient, 0.278; 99% CI [− 0.056, 0.414]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). These data suggest that resilience and food skills factored into participants’ ability to self-manage during the COVID-19 mandate, “stay at home.”</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42844-022-00087-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-022-00087-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, there were limited options for eating away from home, obligating many US adults to prepare foods at home, a situation that provided an opportunity to examine relationships between food skills, resilience, and coping in the initial months of the pandemic. This research surveyed a convenience sample of adults (n = 134; 18–45 years of age) from the Phoenix Metropolitan area when a “stay at home” pandemic directive was mandated in the state of AZ. The study objective was to explore how food skills correlated to resilience and whether resilience directly related to the ability to manage oneself during this time. Previously validated measures for food skills and resiliency were utilized for the online questionnaire, which also included the question, “I was able to manage myself during the Coronavirus Pandemic.” The Spearman’s rank order correlation test and a linear, stepwise regression analysis were used to examine relationships between scores. Participants scored at the 77% percentile for total food skill proficiency, and at the 84th percentile for resilience. Both total food skills and resilience were correlated to the ability to self-manage during COVID-19 (r = 0.246 and r = 0.444, respectively; p ≤ 0.004). The stepwise linear regression model retained only the food skill domain “food selection and planning” as a significant predictor of resilience (standardized coefficient, 0.278; 99% CI [− 0.056, 0.414]; p < 0.05). These data suggest that resilience and food skills factored into participants’ ability to self-manage during the COVID-19 mandate, “stay at home.”

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间(2020年4月至6月)美国18至45岁成年人的饮食技能与复原力之间的关系:一份简短报告
在新冠肺炎大流行早期,外出就餐的选择有限,许多美国成年人不得不在家准备食物,这种情况为研究大流行最初几个月的饮食技能、恢复力和应对之间的关系提供了机会。这项研究调查了一个方便的成年人样本(n = 134;18–45岁),当时亚利桑那州强制执行了“待在家里”的疫情指令。该研究的目的是探索食物技能如何与恢复力相关,以及恢复力是否与这段时间的自我管理能力直接相关。在线问卷采用了先前验证过的食物技能和恢复力指标,其中还包括“我在冠状病毒大流行期间能够管理自己”的问题。Spearman的秩序相关性检验和线性逐步回归分析用于检验分数之间的关系。参与者的总食物技能熟练度得分为77%,韧性得分为84。新冠肺炎期间,总的饮食技能和恢复力与自我管理能力相关(r = 0.246和r = 0.444;p ≤ 0.004)。逐步线性回归模型仅保留了食物技能领域“食物选择和计划”作为恢复力的显著预测因子(标准化系数,0.278;99%置信区间[- 0.056,0.414];p <; 0.05)。这些数据表明,在新冠肺炎任务期间,“待在家里”,韧性和食物技能是参与者自我管理能力的一个因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Finding Silver Linings: Benefit-Finding, Stress, and Depressive Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic Psychological Resilience Mediates the Relationship Between BCE’s and Life Satisfaction: Examining Turkish Students Intersection of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Subjective Well-Being and Social Anxiety among Sojourners in China The Interplay Between Female Caregiver Proactive Coping, Stress, and Adaptive Caregiver Personality on Early Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Moderated-Mediation Model Self-Care Mediates Current Adverse Experiences and Depressive Symptoms Among Emerging Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1