A Comparison of Proliferative Capacity of Reticular and Erosive Variants of Oral Lichen Planus by Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organizer Regions Method.

Swati Shrikant Gotmare, Anish A Gupta, Mandavi Waghmare, Pratibha Kavle, Asha Rathod, Sushma Sonawne, Treville Pereira
{"title":"A Comparison of Proliferative Capacity of Reticular and Erosive Variants of Oral Lichen Planus by Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organizer Regions Method.","authors":"Swati Shrikant Gotmare,&nbsp;Anish A Gupta,&nbsp;Mandavi Waghmare,&nbsp;Pratibha Kavle,&nbsp;Asha Rathod,&nbsp;Sushma Sonawne,&nbsp;Treville Pereira","doi":"10.4103/jmau.jmau_104_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral lichen planus (OLP), an immune mediated disorder, has been recognized since 1869 and is presented as any one of the six variants. Reticular and erosive are the most frequently encountered. Its proliferative capacity can give some information regarding its progression. We adopted the argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) method because of its simplicity to use and dependable results. We evaluated AgNORs in basal, suprabasal, and squamous cell layers. We also compared these three layers within two variants, reticular, and erosive.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty clinically diagnosed patients of OLP were included in the study. Reticular and erosive variants were included in our study. This was followed by hematoxylin and eosin staining and later by the AgNOR method. The mean number of AgNORs per nucleus was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen males and 17 females were the gender distribution. Twenty-three (76.67%) had reticular pattern and seven (23.33%) had erosive pattern. The basal cell layer had the highest mean AgNOR compared to suprabasal and squamous layers. Even among, erosive and reticular variants, the former had higher mean AgNOR counts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results suggest that the inflammatory infiltrate close to the epithelial cells can alter the proliferation index for the pattern of protein synthesis of these cells. Moreover, the high proliferative index in OLP can be related to a specific immunologic response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that AgNOR can be used as a proliferative marker in earlier lesions to detect the severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure","volume":"11 1","pages":"12-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/b1/JMAU-11-12.PMC10153732.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmau.jmau_104_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Oral lichen planus (OLP), an immune mediated disorder, has been recognized since 1869 and is presented as any one of the six variants. Reticular and erosive are the most frequently encountered. Its proliferative capacity can give some information regarding its progression. We adopted the argyrophilic nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) method because of its simplicity to use and dependable results. We evaluated AgNORs in basal, suprabasal, and squamous cell layers. We also compared these three layers within two variants, reticular, and erosive.

Materials and methods: Thirty clinically diagnosed patients of OLP were included in the study. Reticular and erosive variants were included in our study. This was followed by hematoxylin and eosin staining and later by the AgNOR method. The mean number of AgNORs per nucleus was calculated.

Results: Thirteen males and 17 females were the gender distribution. Twenty-three (76.67%) had reticular pattern and seven (23.33%) had erosive pattern. The basal cell layer had the highest mean AgNOR compared to suprabasal and squamous layers. Even among, erosive and reticular variants, the former had higher mean AgNOR counts.

Discussion: Our results suggest that the inflammatory infiltrate close to the epithelial cells can alter the proliferation index for the pattern of protein synthesis of these cells. Moreover, the high proliferative index in OLP can be related to a specific immunologic response.

Conclusion: We conclude that AgNOR can be used as a proliferative marker in earlier lesions to detect the severity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用嗜银核仁组织区法比较口腔扁平苔藓网状型和侵蚀型的增殖能力。
背景:口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)是一种免疫介导的疾病,自1869年以来一直被发现,并表现为六种变体中的任何一种。网状和侵蚀是最常见的。其增殖能力可以提供有关其进展的一些信息。我们采用亲银核仁组织区(AgNORs)方法,因为它使用简单,结果可靠。我们评估了基底、基底上和鳞状细胞层的AgNORs。我们还比较了这三层的两种变体,网状层和侵蚀层。材料与方法:选取30例临床诊断为OLP的患者。我们的研究包括网状和侵蚀型变异。随后进行苏木精和伊红染色,再进行AgNOR染色。计算每个细胞核中AgNORs的平均数目。结果:男性13例,女性17例。网状纹23例(76.67%),侵蚀纹7例(23.33%)。基底细胞层的平均AgNOR高于基底上层和鳞状层。即使在侵蚀型和网状型变异中,前者也有较高的平均AgNOR计数。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,炎症浸润靠近上皮细胞可以改变这些细胞的蛋白质合成模式的增殖指数。此外,OLP的高增殖指数可能与特定的免疫反应有关。结论:AgNOR可以作为早期病变的增殖标志物来检测病变的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Stereological and Histological Assessment of the Umbilical Cord in New-Born Rat. Impaired Glucose Homeostasis Accompanies Cellular Changes in Endocrine Pancreas after Atorvastatin Administration. Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation of Wi-Fi Router on Thyroid Gland and the Possible Protective Role of Combined Vitamin C and Zinc Administration in Adult Male Albino Rats. Orthokeratinized Odontogenic Keratocyst: Report of Nine Cases with Review of Literature Comparative Evaluation of the Osteogenic Potential of Titanium Discs Subjected to Argon Plasma Surface Treatment: An in vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1