Representations of parenting autistic children: A critical interpretive synthesis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1080/11038128.2023.2210802
Meredith J Dash, Yani Hamdani, Debbie Laliberte Rudman, Gail Teachman
{"title":"Representations of parenting autistic children: A critical interpretive synthesis.","authors":"Meredith J Dash, Yani Hamdani, Debbie Laliberte Rudman, Gail Teachman","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2023.2210802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many taken-for-granted expectations for parents in Western societies are situated in normative assumptions. Social constructions of 'good' parenting may be a poor fit for parents whose children's development varies from a so-called typical trajectory. Normative assumptions about parenting can have harmful effects for parents of autistic children.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>This paper examines representations of parenting autistic children in contemporary research and considers the potential effects of these representations on these parents' occupational possibilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Informed by a critical occupational perspective, a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) of 27 research articles focussed on parenting autistic children was conducted.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Three major discursive threads were identified regarding how parents of autistic children are represented in research: gendered assumptions, caregiving as all-consuming, and disruption of normative expectations of parenting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Normative discourses about parenting were (re)produced within this body of research which may perpetuate limitations in the occupational possibilities of parents of autistic children. Critical investigation into contemporary research is necessary to challenge taken for granted expectations for parents of children with autism, to mitigate harmful effects for parents, to inform transformative OT practices and policies, and to promote equitable service provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2210802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many taken-for-granted expectations for parents in Western societies are situated in normative assumptions. Social constructions of 'good' parenting may be a poor fit for parents whose children's development varies from a so-called typical trajectory. Normative assumptions about parenting can have harmful effects for parents of autistic children.

Aims/objectives: This paper examines representations of parenting autistic children in contemporary research and considers the potential effects of these representations on these parents' occupational possibilities.

Methods: Informed by a critical occupational perspective, a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) of 27 research articles focussed on parenting autistic children was conducted.

Findings: Three major discursive threads were identified regarding how parents of autistic children are represented in research: gendered assumptions, caregiving as all-consuming, and disruption of normative expectations of parenting.

Conclusions and significance: Normative discourses about parenting were (re)produced within this body of research which may perpetuate limitations in the occupational possibilities of parents of autistic children. Critical investigation into contemporary research is necessary to challenge taken for granted expectations for parents of children with autism, to mitigate harmful effects for parents, to inform transformative OT practices and policies, and to promote equitable service provision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养育自闭症儿童的表现:一个批判性的解释性综合。
背景:西方社会对父母的许多理所当然的期望都是基于规范性假设。对于那些孩子的发展偏离所谓的典型轨迹的父母来说,“好”父母的社会建构可能不太适合。关于育儿的规范性假设可能对自闭症儿童的父母产生有害影响。目的/目的:本文考察了当代研究中养育自闭症儿童的表征,并考虑了这些表征对这些父母职业可能性的潜在影响。方法:采用批判性职业视角,对27篇自闭症儿童养育相关研究进行批判性解释综合分析(critical interpretive synthesis, CIS)。研究发现:关于自闭症儿童的父母在研究中是如何表现的,确定了三个主要的话语线索:性别假设,照顾是全部消耗,以及育儿的规范期望的破坏。结论和意义:关于养育子女的规范性话语在本研究中被(重新)产生,这可能会使自闭症儿童父母的职业可能性受到限制。有必要对当代研究进行批判性调查,以挑战对自闭症儿童父母的理所当然的期望,减轻对父母的有害影响,为变革的OT实践和政策提供信息,并促进公平的服务提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity. Cognitive interviews on the Swedish occupational balance questionnaire. Occupational therapy in the space of artificial intelligence: Ethical considerations and human-centered efforts. Evaluation of a driving clinical decision pathway for generalist occupational therapists: Pilot test of practice change. Developmental coordination disorder questionnaire - translation and adaptation into Danish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1