Growth curves of common factors in psychotherapy: Multilevel growth modelling and outcome analysis

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1002/cpp.2864
Deborah Meier, Wolfgang Tschacher, Angela Frommer, Franz Moggi, Mario Pfammatter
{"title":"Growth curves of common factors in psychotherapy: Multilevel growth modelling and outcome analysis","authors":"Deborah Meier,&nbsp;Wolfgang Tschacher,&nbsp;Angela Frommer,&nbsp;Franz Moggi,&nbsp;Mario Pfammatter","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>A large body of literature discusses change mechanisms underlying psychotherapy with an emphasis on common factors. The present study examined how different comprehensive common factors change over the course of therapy and whether this change was associated with clinical outcome at discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Three hundred forty-eight adults (mean age = 32.1, <i>SD</i> = 10.6; 64% female) attended a standardized 14-week day-clinic psychotherapy program. They provided longitudinal data on common factors based on weekly assessments. Additionally, pre- and post-assessment questionnaires on clinical outcome were completed. Using multilevel modelling, we predicted common factors by time (week in therapy). Multiple linear regression models tested the association between changes in common factors and clinical outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The common factor ‘Therapeutic Alliance’ was best fitted by linear growth models, whereas models for the common factors ‘Coping’, ‘Cognitive Integration’ and ‘Affective Processing’ indicated logarithmic changes over time. ‘Coping’, that is change in patients' ability to cope with their individual problems, was most closely linked with outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present study provides evidence for the changeability of common factors over the course of therapy as well as their specific contributions to psychotherapeutic progress.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 5","pages":"1095-1110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2864","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

A large body of literature discusses change mechanisms underlying psychotherapy with an emphasis on common factors. The present study examined how different comprehensive common factors change over the course of therapy and whether this change was associated with clinical outcome at discharge.

Method

Three hundred forty-eight adults (mean age = 32.1, SD = 10.6; 64% female) attended a standardized 14-week day-clinic psychotherapy program. They provided longitudinal data on common factors based on weekly assessments. Additionally, pre- and post-assessment questionnaires on clinical outcome were completed. Using multilevel modelling, we predicted common factors by time (week in therapy). Multiple linear regression models tested the association between changes in common factors and clinical outcome.

Results

The common factor ‘Therapeutic Alliance’ was best fitted by linear growth models, whereas models for the common factors ‘Coping’, ‘Cognitive Integration’ and ‘Affective Processing’ indicated logarithmic changes over time. ‘Coping’, that is change in patients' ability to cope with their individual problems, was most closely linked with outcome.

Conclusions

The present study provides evidence for the changeability of common factors over the course of therapy as well as their specific contributions to psychotherapeutic progress.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理治疗中常见因素的生长曲线:多层次生长模型和结果分析。
目的:大量文献讨论了心理治疗的变化机制,并强调了常见因素。本研究考察了不同的综合常见因素在治疗过程中的变化,以及这种变化是否与出院时的临床结果有关。方法:三百四十八名成年人(平均年龄 = 32.1,标准差 = 10.6;64%的女性)参加了标准化的14周 日间诊所心理治疗项目。他们根据每周评估提供了关于共同因素的纵向数据。此外,还完成了临床结果评估前和评估后的问卷调查。使用多层次模型,我们按时间(治疗周)预测了常见因素。多元线性回归模型检验了常见因素的变化与临床结果之间的相关性。结果:共同因素“治疗联盟”最适合线性增长模型,而共同因素“应对”、“认知整合”和“情感处理”的模型显示出随时间的对数变化“应对”,即患者应对个人问题能力的变化,与结果最为密切。结论:本研究为常见因素在治疗过程中的变化性及其对心理治疗进展的具体贡献提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
Presence and Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Reflective Functioning on Aggression in Adults With Antisocial Behaviour Do Therapists Know When Their Clients Deteriorate? An Investigation of Therapists' Ability to Estimate and Predict Client Change During and After Psychotherapy Resilience and Religious Coping in Libyan Survivors of Hurricane Daniele If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models Intrusive Thoughts and Images in Health Anxiety: Rates, Characteristics, and Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1