Deborah Meier, Wolfgang Tschacher, Angela Frommer, Franz Moggi, Mario Pfammatter
{"title":"Growth curves of common factors in psychotherapy: Multilevel growth modelling and outcome analysis","authors":"Deborah Meier, Wolfgang Tschacher, Angela Frommer, Franz Moggi, Mario Pfammatter","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>A large body of literature discusses change mechanisms underlying psychotherapy with an emphasis on common factors. The present study examined how different comprehensive common factors change over the course of therapy and whether this change was associated with clinical outcome at discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Three hundred forty-eight adults (mean age = 32.1, <i>SD</i> = 10.6; 64% female) attended a standardized 14-week day-clinic psychotherapy program. They provided longitudinal data on common factors based on weekly assessments. Additionally, pre- and post-assessment questionnaires on clinical outcome were completed. Using multilevel modelling, we predicted common factors by time (week in therapy). Multiple linear regression models tested the association between changes in common factors and clinical outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The common factor ‘Therapeutic Alliance’ was best fitted by linear growth models, whereas models for the common factors ‘Coping’, ‘Cognitive Integration’ and ‘Affective Processing’ indicated logarithmic changes over time. ‘Coping’, that is change in patients' ability to cope with their individual problems, was most closely linked with outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present study provides evidence for the changeability of common factors over the course of therapy as well as their specific contributions to psychotherapeutic progress.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 5","pages":"1095-1110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2864","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
A large body of literature discusses change mechanisms underlying psychotherapy with an emphasis on common factors. The present study examined how different comprehensive common factors change over the course of therapy and whether this change was associated with clinical outcome at discharge.
Method
Three hundred forty-eight adults (mean age = 32.1, SD = 10.6; 64% female) attended a standardized 14-week day-clinic psychotherapy program. They provided longitudinal data on common factors based on weekly assessments. Additionally, pre- and post-assessment questionnaires on clinical outcome were completed. Using multilevel modelling, we predicted common factors by time (week in therapy). Multiple linear regression models tested the association between changes in common factors and clinical outcome.
Results
The common factor ‘Therapeutic Alliance’ was best fitted by linear growth models, whereas models for the common factors ‘Coping’, ‘Cognitive Integration’ and ‘Affective Processing’ indicated logarithmic changes over time. ‘Coping’, that is change in patients' ability to cope with their individual problems, was most closely linked with outcome.
Conclusions
The present study provides evidence for the changeability of common factors over the course of therapy as well as their specific contributions to psychotherapeutic progress.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.