Three perspectives on learning in a simulated patient scenario: a qualitative interview study with student, simulated patient, and teacher.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s41077-023-00249-0
Sten Erici, Daniel Lindqvist, Mats B Lindström, Christina Gummesson
{"title":"Three perspectives on learning in a simulated patient scenario: a qualitative interview study with student, simulated patient, and teacher.","authors":"Sten Erici,&nbsp;Daniel Lindqvist,&nbsp;Mats B Lindström,&nbsp;Christina Gummesson","doi":"10.1186/s41077-023-00249-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient simulation can be useful for medical students in developing communication skills for vulnerable situations. Three participants are primarily involved in the patient simulation activities: the student, the simulated patient (SP), and the teacher. We here aimed to explore these participants' perceptions of learning in a patient simulation scenario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted individual interviews with eight students, three teachers, and one SP at a psychiatry placement of a Medical Doctor Program (5th year). During the interviews we asked the participants to watch a video of their participation in a patient simulation session. Thus, we obtained three perspectives on each of the eight recordings. We analysed our data with qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were generated: identity formation, collaborative learning, and learning intentions. This highly emotional scenario forced students out of their comfort zone, to the intersection of their roles as private person and professional. The SP perceived the collaborative creation of the scenario as significant learning. The teacher took a professional position and perceived the learning in the perspective of a future colleague.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mutually created emotionally loaded scenario was found to be important from all three perspectives, forcing the students to identify unexpected ways of communicating. This possibly enhanced their professional identity development. Implications for future research can be to explore the process of skills transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"8 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00249-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient simulation can be useful for medical students in developing communication skills for vulnerable situations. Three participants are primarily involved in the patient simulation activities: the student, the simulated patient (SP), and the teacher. We here aimed to explore these participants' perceptions of learning in a patient simulation scenario.

Methods: We conducted individual interviews with eight students, three teachers, and one SP at a psychiatry placement of a Medical Doctor Program (5th year). During the interviews we asked the participants to watch a video of their participation in a patient simulation session. Thus, we obtained three perspectives on each of the eight recordings. We analysed our data with qualitative content analysis.

Results: Three themes were generated: identity formation, collaborative learning, and learning intentions. This highly emotional scenario forced students out of their comfort zone, to the intersection of their roles as private person and professional. The SP perceived the collaborative creation of the scenario as significant learning. The teacher took a professional position and perceived the learning in the perspective of a future colleague.

Conclusions: The mutually created emotionally loaded scenario was found to be important from all three perspectives, forcing the students to identify unexpected ways of communicating. This possibly enhanced their professional identity development. Implications for future research can be to explore the process of skills transfer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在模拟病人情境中学习的三个视角:对学生、模拟病人和老师的定性访谈研究。
病人模拟可以帮助医学生在脆弱的情况下发展沟通技巧。患者模拟活动主要涉及三个参与者:学生、模拟患者(SP)和教师。我们在此旨在探讨这些参与者在患者模拟场景中的学习感知。方法:我们对医学博士项目(第5年)精神病学实习的8名学生、3名教师和1名SP进行了个人访谈。在访谈中,我们要求参与者观看他们参与病人模拟会话的视频。因此,我们对这八段录音中的每一段都获得了三个视角。我们用定性内容分析来分析我们的数据。结果:产生了三个主题:身份形成、协作学习和学习意图。这种高度情绪化的情景迫使学生们走出他们的舒适区,来到他们作为私人和专业角色的交叉点。SP认为场景的协作创造是有意义的学习。老师站在专业的立场上,从未来同事的角度来看待学习。结论:从所有三个角度来看,相互创造的情感负载场景都很重要,迫使学生识别意想不到的沟通方式。这可能会促进他们的职业认同发展。对未来研究的启示可以是探索技能迁移的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Educational design insights for interprofessional immersive simulation to prepare allied health students for clinical placements. Massive open online course: a new strategy for faculty development needs in healthcare simulation. Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training. Speech recognition technology for assessing team debriefing communication and interaction patterns: An algorithmic toolkit for healthcare simulation educators. Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1