Effects of Dry Needling and Low-Power Laser for the Treatment of Trigger Points in the Upper Trapezius Muscle: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mohammadreza Ansari MD , Sadegh Baradaran Mahdavi MD , Babak Vahdatpour MD , Atieh Lahijanian MD , Saeid Khosrawi MD
{"title":"Effects of Dry Needling and Low-Power Laser for the Treatment of Trigger Points in the Upper Trapezius Muscle: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Mohammadreza Ansari MD ,&nbsp;Sadegh Baradaran Mahdavi MD ,&nbsp;Babak Vahdatpour MD ,&nbsp;Atieh Lahijanian MD ,&nbsp;Saeid Khosrawi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of low-power laser therapy, dry needling<span><span><span>, and exercise therapy on treating patients with neck and </span>back pain and a diagnosis of the myofascial trigger points in the upper </span>trapezius muscle.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A randomized clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan, Iran, in 2019. The study sample (78 participants) was randomly allocated to 3 groups of 26, including stretching exercises (3 times a day for 2 weeks, control group), low-power laser (3 sessions for 2 weeks, 6 J/cm</span><sup>2</sup><span><span><span>, mean power of 100 MW in each point), and dry needling (4 sessions, with 25 × 0.25-mm needles). For all patients, the visual analog scale (VAS), </span>neck disability index (NDI), and </span>shoulder pain and disability index<span> (SPDI) were completed at baseline, immediately, and 1 month after treatment.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Final participants in this study (n = 60) consisted of 33 (55%) female patients and 27 (45%) male patients, with a mean age of 51.25 ± 7.94 years. In the exercise group, VAS, NDI, and SPDI scores were not remarkably different in the studied periods (</span><em>P</em> &gt; .05). Moreover, a notable decrease in VAS, NDI, and SPDI scores were observed in the treatment intervals. However, by excluding the effect of the control group, no substantial difference was observed between the 2 treatments (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of laser therapy and dry needling methods induced a rapid response to pain relief. There was no difference between the 2 forms of treatment in the short term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of low-power laser therapy, dry needling, and exercise therapy on treating patients with neck and back pain and a diagnosis of the myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle.

Methods

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan, Iran, in 2019. The study sample (78 participants) was randomly allocated to 3 groups of 26, including stretching exercises (3 times a day for 2 weeks, control group), low-power laser (3 sessions for 2 weeks, 6 J/cm2, mean power of 100 MW in each point), and dry needling (4 sessions, with 25 × 0.25-mm needles). For all patients, the visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPDI) were completed at baseline, immediately, and 1 month after treatment.

Results

Final participants in this study (n = 60) consisted of 33 (55%) female patients and 27 (45%) male patients, with a mean age of 51.25 ± 7.94 years. In the exercise group, VAS, NDI, and SPDI scores were not remarkably different in the studied periods (P > .05). Moreover, a notable decrease in VAS, NDI, and SPDI scores were observed in the treatment intervals. However, by excluding the effect of the control group, no substantial difference was observed between the 2 treatments (P > .05).

Conclusion

The use of laser therapy and dry needling methods induced a rapid response to pain relief. There was no difference between the 2 forms of treatment in the short term.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干针联合低功率激光治疗斜方肌上部触发点的疗效:随机临床试验
目的本研究的目的是比较低功率激光治疗、干针治疗和运动治疗对颈背部疼痛患者的治疗效果以及对斜方肌上部肌筋膜触发点的诊断。方法2019年在伊朗伊斯法罕进行一项随机临床试验。研究样本(78名参与者)随机分为3组,每组26人,包括伸展运动(对照组,每天3次,持续2周)、低功率激光(3次,持续2周,6 J/cm2,每个点平均功率为100 MW)和干针(4次,25支 × 0.25 mm针)。所有患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、肩关节疼痛和残疾指数(SPDI)分别在基线、治疗后立即和治疗后1个月完成。结果本研究最终纳入的患者(n = 60例)中,女性33例(55%),男性27例(45%),平均年龄51.25±7.94岁。在运动组,VAS、NDI和SPDI评分在研究期间无显著差异(P >. 05)。此外,在治疗期间观察到VAS、NDI和SPDI评分显著下降。然而,通过排除对照组的影响,两种治疗之间没有显著差异(P >. 05)。结论激光治疗和干针治疗能快速缓解疼痛。两种治疗方式在短期内无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pain-Related Anxiety and Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Standing Postural Tasks in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study Development of a Headache Diary and Assessment of Tension-Type Headache Diagnostic Criteria and Oral Behaviors, Joint Range of Motion, and Tenderness to Palpation: An Observational Study Editorial board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1