Yongsuk Seo, Tyler D Quinn, Jung-Hyun Kim, Jeffrey B Powell, Raymond J Roberge, Aitor Coca
{"title":"Effects of 5-Day Heat Acclimation on Workers Wearing Personal Protective Clothing.","authors":"Yongsuk Seo, Tyler D Quinn, Jung-Hyun Kim, Jeffrey B Powell, Raymond J Roberge, Aitor Coca","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Elevated ambient temperature and personal protective clothing (PPC) induce physiological strain which may be counteracted by heat acclimation. The purpose of this study was to determine if 5-day heat acclimation training (HAT) improves thermal and perceptual responses while wearing chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) PPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine healthy men completed a heat stress test (walking for one hour with CBRN PPC) in 35°C and 50% relative humidity (RH) before and after 5-day HAT. The HAT consisted of five consecutive days of two 45-minute cycling sessions (50% VO2max) wearing athletic clothing separated by a 15 min rest in 45°C and 20% RH. Results of the pre- and post-HAT heat stress tests were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heat acclimation was seen through 5-day HAT; however, thermoregulatory responses did not improve while wearing CBRN PPC. Improvement (p<0.05, day 1 vs. day 5 HAT) in skin temperature (38.0±0.5°C vs. 37.6±0.5°C), body temperature (38.6±0.4°C vs. 38.3±0.4°C), sweat rate (2.26±0.3kg vs. 2.64±0.3kg), RPE (15.8±2.4 vs. 13.9±3.1), and heat perception (5.7±0.6 vs. 4.9±1.0) were noted. However, no physiological or perceptual improvements (p>0.05) were found in the post-HAT heat stress test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heat acclimation adaptations may be blunted by CBRN PPC, thus requiring differing or extended HAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":73743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of exercise and nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194072/pdf/nihms-1877618.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of exercise and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Elevated ambient temperature and personal protective clothing (PPC) induce physiological strain which may be counteracted by heat acclimation. The purpose of this study was to determine if 5-day heat acclimation training (HAT) improves thermal and perceptual responses while wearing chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) PPC.
Methods: Nine healthy men completed a heat stress test (walking for one hour with CBRN PPC) in 35°C and 50% relative humidity (RH) before and after 5-day HAT. The HAT consisted of five consecutive days of two 45-minute cycling sessions (50% VO2max) wearing athletic clothing separated by a 15 min rest in 45°C and 20% RH. Results of the pre- and post-HAT heat stress tests were compared.
Results: Heat acclimation was seen through 5-day HAT; however, thermoregulatory responses did not improve while wearing CBRN PPC. Improvement (p<0.05, day 1 vs. day 5 HAT) in skin temperature (38.0±0.5°C vs. 37.6±0.5°C), body temperature (38.6±0.4°C vs. 38.3±0.4°C), sweat rate (2.26±0.3kg vs. 2.64±0.3kg), RPE (15.8±2.4 vs. 13.9±3.1), and heat perception (5.7±0.6 vs. 4.9±1.0) were noted. However, no physiological or perceptual improvements (p>0.05) were found in the post-HAT heat stress test.
Conclusions: Heat acclimation adaptations may be blunted by CBRN PPC, thus requiring differing or extended HAT.