A meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of safinamide for levodopa-induced motor complications in Parkinson's disease.

IF 6.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1080/02648725.2023.2215045
Jiaojiao Li, Jianyu Zhang, Pin Meng
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of safinamide for levodopa-induced motor complications in Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Jiaojiao Li, Jianyu Zhang, Pin Meng","doi":"10.1080/02648725.2023.2215045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of safinamide in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor complications of Parkinson's disease (PD). A search strategy was developed and PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang Data were searched to find randomized controlled trials on the treatment of PD motor complications caused by levodopa with safinamide. A manual reference search was conducted for articles published until June 2022 to independently screen references, extract data, and evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was utilized to analyze the data. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials with 2061 PD patients were included, containing 1277 patients in the safinamide group (trial group) and 784 patients in the control group. Meta-analysis results exhibited that regarding effectiveness, the duration of continuous optimal drug effect without dyskinesia (On-time) of the 50 mg trial group was longer than that of the control group. The On-time of the 100 mg trial group was longer than that of the control group.The improvement of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRSIII) score in the 50 mg trial group was better than that in the control group. The improvement of the UPDRSIII score of the 100 mg trial group was better than that of the control group.There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Safinamide is effective and safe in the treatment of PD motor complications caused by levodopa.</p>","PeriodicalId":55355,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"4627-4638"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2023.2215045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of safinamide in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor complications of Parkinson's disease (PD). A search strategy was developed and PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang Data were searched to find randomized controlled trials on the treatment of PD motor complications caused by levodopa with safinamide. A manual reference search was conducted for articles published until June 2022 to independently screen references, extract data, and evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was utilized to analyze the data. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials with 2061 PD patients were included, containing 1277 patients in the safinamide group (trial group) and 784 patients in the control group. Meta-analysis results exhibited that regarding effectiveness, the duration of continuous optimal drug effect without dyskinesia (On-time) of the 50 mg trial group was longer than that of the control group. The On-time of the 100 mg trial group was longer than that of the control group.The improvement of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRSIII) score in the 50 mg trial group was better than that in the control group. The improvement of the UPDRSIII score of the 100 mg trial group was better than that of the control group.There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Safinamide is effective and safe in the treatment of PD motor complications caused by levodopa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于沙芬那胺治疗左旋多巴诱发的帕金森病运动并发症的有效性和安全性的荟萃分析。
目的:系统评价沙芬那胺治疗左旋多巴诱发的帕金森病(PD)运动并发症的有效性和安全性。制定了检索策略,并检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)和万方数据,以找到关于用沙芬那胺治疗左旋多巴引起的帕金森病运动并发症的随机对照试验。对2022年6月之前发表的文章进行了人工参考文献检索,以独立筛选参考文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。使用RevMan 5.3软件对数据进行分析。共纳入了5项随机对照试验,2061名帕金森病患者接受了治疗,其中沙芬那胺组(试验组)有1277名患者,对照组有784名患者。元分析结果显示,在疗效方面,50 毫克试验组无运动障碍的持续最佳药效持续时间(On-time)长于对照组。50 毫克试验组的帕金森病统一评定量表第三部分(UPDRSIII)评分改善情况优于对照组。两组的不良反应发生率无显著差异。在治疗左旋多巴引起的帕金森氏症运动并发症方面,沙芬那胺是有效且安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews
Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews publishes major invited review articles covering important developments in industrial, agricultural and medical applications of biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
Application of Shouwu Yizhi prescription in decubation of patients with ischemic stroke. Analysis of non-targeted serum metabolomics in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperuricemia. Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholecystitis with gallstones. Evaluating the value of progressive muscle relaxation therapy for patients with lumbar disc herniation after surgery based on a difference-in-differences model. Regulation of TREM2 on BV2 inflammation through PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1