{"title":"Validating lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a component of the PLASMIC predictive tool (PLASMIC-LDH).","authors":"Christopher Chin Keong Liam,&nbsp;Jim Yu-Hsiang Tiao,&nbsp;Yee Yee Yap,&nbsp;Yi Lin Lee,&nbsp;Jameela Sathar,&nbsp;Simon McRae,&nbsp;Amanda Davis,&nbsp;Jennifer Curnow,&nbsp;Robert Bird,&nbsp;Philip Choi,&nbsp;Pantep Angchaisuksiri,&nbsp;Sim Leng Tien,&nbsp;Joyce Ching Mei Lam,&nbsp;Doyeun Oh,&nbsp;Jin Seok Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Soo Yoon,&nbsp;Raymond Siu-Ming Wong,&nbsp;Carolyn Lauren,&nbsp;Eileen Grace Merriman,&nbsp;Anoop Enjeti,&nbsp;Mark Smith,&nbsp;Ross Ian Baker","doi":"10.5045/br.2023.2022133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The PLASMIC score is a convenient tool for predicting ADAMTS13 activity of <10%. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is widely used as a marker of haemolysis in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) monitoring, and could be used as a replacement marker for lysis. We aimed to validate the PLASMIC score in a multi-centre Asia Pacific region, and to explore whether LDH could be used as a replacement marker for lysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) were reviewed. Patients' ADAMTS13 activity levels were obtained, along with clinical/laboratory findings relevant to the PLASMIC score. Both PLASMIC scores and PLASMIC-LDH scores, in which LDH replaced traditional lysis markers, were calculated. We generated a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and compared the area under the curve values (AUC) to determine the predictive ability of each score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 34 had ADAMTS13 activity levels of <10%. When the patients were divided into intermediate-to-high risk (scores 5‒7) and low risk (scores 0‒4), the PLASMIC score showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 58.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.5%. The PLASMIC-LDH score had a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 33.3%, with a PPV of 80.5% and NPV of 80.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study validated the utility of the PLASMIC score, and demonstrated PLASMIC-LDH as a reasonable alternative in the absence of traditional lysis markers, to help identify high-risk patients for treatment via plasma exchange.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":"58 1","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/e3/br-58-1-36.PMC10063598.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The PLASMIC score is a convenient tool for predicting ADAMTS13 activity of <10%. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is widely used as a marker of haemolysis in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) monitoring, and could be used as a replacement marker for lysis. We aimed to validate the PLASMIC score in a multi-centre Asia Pacific region, and to explore whether LDH could be used as a replacement marker for lysis.

Methods: Records of patients with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) were reviewed. Patients' ADAMTS13 activity levels were obtained, along with clinical/laboratory findings relevant to the PLASMIC score. Both PLASMIC scores and PLASMIC-LDH scores, in which LDH replaced traditional lysis markers, were calculated. We generated a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and compared the area under the curve values (AUC) to determine the predictive ability of each score.

Results: 46 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 34 had ADAMTS13 activity levels of <10%. When the patients were divided into intermediate-to-high risk (scores 5‒7) and low risk (scores 0‒4), the PLASMIC score showed a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 58.3%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.5%. The PLASMIC-LDH score had a sensitivity of 97.1% and specificity of 33.3%, with a PPV of 80.5% and NPV of 80.0%.

Conclusion: Our study validated the utility of the PLASMIC score, and demonstrated PLASMIC-LDH as a reasonable alternative in the absence of traditional lysis markers, to help identify high-risk patients for treatment via plasma exchange.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)作为PLASMIC预测工具(PLASMIC-LDH)的一个组成部分。
背景:PLASMIC评分是预测血栓性微血管病(TMA)患者ADAMTS13活性的便捷工具。获得患者ADAMTS13活动水平,以及与PLASMIC评分相关的临床/实验室结果。计算了PLASMIC评分和PLASMIC-LDH评分,其中LDH取代了传统的裂解标记。我们生成了一个接收者算子特征(ROC)曲线,并比较曲线下的面积值(AUC),以确定每个分数的预测能力。结果:46例患者符合纳入标准,其中34例达到ADAMTS13活性水平。结论:我们的研究验证了PLASMIC评分的实用性,并证明了PLASMIC- ldh在缺乏传统溶解标志物的情况下是一种合理的替代方法,有助于识别通过血浆置换治疗的高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Salivary lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a tool for early diagnosis of oral cancer in individuals with Fanconi anemia
IF 4.7 4区 医学Medical hypothesesPub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.07.021
Talita Piassa Mafessoni, Carolina Eurich Mazur, José Miguel Amenábar
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
Correction: Evidence‑based Korean guidelines for the clinical management of multiple myeloma: addressing 12 key clinical questions. Frequent association of malignant effusions in plasmablastic lymphoma: a single-institutional experience of nine cases in Taiwan. Efficacy and safety of thalidomide with hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia: a quasi-experimental clinical trial. Clinical features and outcomes of JAK2 unmutated erythrocytosis. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients with hematological and oncological diseases in early 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1