Turning words into numbers: Assessing work attitudes using natural language processing.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Applied Psychology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1037/apl0001061
Andrew B Speer, James Perrotta, Andrew P Tenbrink, Lauren J Wegmeyer, Angie Y Delacruz, Jenna Bowker
{"title":"Turning words into numbers: Assessing work attitudes using natural language processing.","authors":"Andrew B Speer,&nbsp;James Perrotta,&nbsp;Andrew P Tenbrink,&nbsp;Lauren J Wegmeyer,&nbsp;Angie Y Delacruz,&nbsp;Jenna Bowker","doi":"10.1037/apl0001061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers and practitioners are often interested in assessing employee attitudes and work perceptions. Although such perceptions are typically measured using Likert surveys or some other closed-end numerical rating format, many organizations also have access to large amounts of qualitative employee data. For example, open-ended comments from employee surveys allow workers to provide rich and contextualized perspectives about work. Unfortunately, there are practical challenges when trying to understand employee perceptions from qualitative data. Given this, the present study investigated whether natural language processing (NLP) algorithms could be developed to automatically score employee comments according to important work attitudes and perceptions. Using a large sample of employees, algorithms were developed to translate text into scores that reflect what comments were about (theme scores) and how positively targeted constructs were described (valence scores) for 28 work constructs. The resulting algorithms and scores are labeled the Text-Based Attitude and Perception Scoring (TAPS) dictionaries, which are made publicly available and were built using a mix of count-based scoring and transformer neural networks. The psychometric properties of the TAPS scores were then investigated. Results showed that theme scores differentiated responses based on their likelihood to discuss specific constructs. Additionally, valence scores exhibited strong evidence of reliability and validity, particularly, when analyzed on text responses that were more relevant to the construct of interest. This suggests that researchers and practitioners should explicitly design text prompts to elicit construct-related information if they wish to accurately assess work attitudes and perceptions via NLP. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":"108 6","pages":"1027-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Researchers and practitioners are often interested in assessing employee attitudes and work perceptions. Although such perceptions are typically measured using Likert surveys or some other closed-end numerical rating format, many organizations also have access to large amounts of qualitative employee data. For example, open-ended comments from employee surveys allow workers to provide rich and contextualized perspectives about work. Unfortunately, there are practical challenges when trying to understand employee perceptions from qualitative data. Given this, the present study investigated whether natural language processing (NLP) algorithms could be developed to automatically score employee comments according to important work attitudes and perceptions. Using a large sample of employees, algorithms were developed to translate text into scores that reflect what comments were about (theme scores) and how positively targeted constructs were described (valence scores) for 28 work constructs. The resulting algorithms and scores are labeled the Text-Based Attitude and Perception Scoring (TAPS) dictionaries, which are made publicly available and were built using a mix of count-based scoring and transformer neural networks. The psychometric properties of the TAPS scores were then investigated. Results showed that theme scores differentiated responses based on their likelihood to discuss specific constructs. Additionally, valence scores exhibited strong evidence of reliability and validity, particularly, when analyzed on text responses that were more relevant to the construct of interest. This suggests that researchers and practitioners should explicitly design text prompts to elicit construct-related information if they wish to accurately assess work attitudes and perceptions via NLP. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将文字转化为数字:使用自然语言处理评估工作态度。
研究人员和从业人员经常对评估员工的态度和工作观念感兴趣。虽然这种看法通常是用李克特调查或其他一些封闭的数字评级格式来衡量的,但许多组织也可以获得大量定性的员工数据。例如,来自员工调查的开放式评论允许员工提供关于工作的丰富和情境化的观点。不幸的是,当试图从定性数据中了解员工的看法时,存在着实际的挑战。鉴于此,本研究探讨了是否可以开发自然语言处理(NLP)算法,根据重要的工作态度和看法自动对员工评论进行评分。使用大量员工样本,开发算法将文本转换为分数,反映评论的内容(主题分数)以及28个工作结构如何描述积极目标结构(效价分数)。结果算法和分数被标记为基于文本的态度和感知评分(TAPS)词典,该词典是公开可用的,并使用基于计数的评分和转换神经网络的混合构建。然后研究了TAPS分数的心理测量特性。结果表明,主题得分根据他们讨论特定构念的可能性来区分反应。此外,效价分数表现出强有力的可靠性和有效性证据,特别是当分析与兴趣结构更相关的文本反应时。这表明,如果研究者和从业者希望通过NLP准确地评估工作态度和感知,他们应该明确地设计文本提示,以引出与结构相关的信息。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including: 1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses). 2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research. 3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
期刊最新文献
Prospects for reducing group mean differences on cognitive tests via item selection strategies. Self-promotion in entrepreneurship: A driver for proactive adaptation. Coping with work-nonwork stressors over time: A person-centered, multistudy integration of coping breadth and depth. A person-centered approach to behaving badly at work: An examination of workplace deviance patterns. How perceived lack of benevolence harms trust of artificial intelligence management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1