Innovative DNP Evaluation Tools.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-2022-0013
Kathy Shaw, Mary Beth Flynn Makic, Sharon Sables-Baus
{"title":"Innovative DNP Evaluation Tools.","authors":"Kathy Shaw,&nbsp;Mary Beth Flynn Makic,&nbsp;Sharon Sables-Baus","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2022-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Innovative strategies are crucial for addressing essential faculty knowledge for teaching and advising Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students, especially during the phase of time-sensitive scholarly projects. Challenges of diverse educational and experiential background of faculty may contribute to inconsistent student advisement and learning. Lack of clear expectations creates barriers to student learning. <b>Methods:</b> Published reports and faculty input were used to develop evaluation tools utilized in DNP project courses. The tools allowed for clear expectations of faculty instruction and advising, student work, and fostered student growth. <b>Results:</b> Rubrics developed for DNP project courses facilitated diverse student learning needs. Evaluation tools, informed by national guidelines, were developed to guide DNP faculty and student success, resulting in consistent evaluation of student scholarly work and attainment of the DNP <i>Essentials</i> <b>Conclusions:</b> Student evaluation tools that reflected the national guidelines facilitated student learning and assisted faculty instruction and advising. These rubrics have positioned our college for the transition to competency-based doctoral education. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> The tools shared in this article could be adapted to fit other DNP programs aligning critical elements of students' attainment of knowledge, skills, and abilities of the DNP degree in the move toward competency-based education in the newly revised <i>Essentials</i> (2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"9-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2022-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Innovative strategies are crucial for addressing essential faculty knowledge for teaching and advising Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students, especially during the phase of time-sensitive scholarly projects. Challenges of diverse educational and experiential background of faculty may contribute to inconsistent student advisement and learning. Lack of clear expectations creates barriers to student learning. Methods: Published reports and faculty input were used to develop evaluation tools utilized in DNP project courses. The tools allowed for clear expectations of faculty instruction and advising, student work, and fostered student growth. Results: Rubrics developed for DNP project courses facilitated diverse student learning needs. Evaluation tools, informed by national guidelines, were developed to guide DNP faculty and student success, resulting in consistent evaluation of student scholarly work and attainment of the DNP Essentials Conclusions: Student evaluation tools that reflected the national guidelines facilitated student learning and assisted faculty instruction and advising. These rubrics have positioned our college for the transition to competency-based doctoral education. Implications for Nursing: The tools shared in this article could be adapted to fit other DNP programs aligning critical elements of students' attainment of knowledge, skills, and abilities of the DNP degree in the move toward competency-based education in the newly revised Essentials (2021).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新的DNP评估工具。
背景:创新策略对于解决护理实践博士(DNP)学生教学和指导的基本教师知识至关重要,特别是在时间敏感的学术项目阶段。教师不同的教育和经验背景的挑战可能导致学生的指导和学习不一致。缺乏明确的期望会给学生的学习造成障碍。方法:利用已发表的报告和教师的意见来开发DNP项目课程中使用的评估工具。这些工具允许对教师指导和建议、学生工作有明确的期望,并促进了学生的成长。结果:为DNP项目课程制定的规则促进了不同学生的学习需求。根据国家指导方针,开发了评估工具来指导DNP教师和学生的成功,从而对学生的学术工作和DNP要点的实现进行一致的评估。结论:反映国家指导方针的学生评估工具促进了学生的学习,并协助了教师的指导和建议。这些准则为我校向以能力为基础的博士教育转型奠定了基础。对护理的影响:本文中分享的工具可以适应其他DNP计划,调整学生获得DNP学位的知识、技能和能力的关键要素,在新修订的要点(2021)中向以能力为基础的教育转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of a Virtual Seminar Series for Doctor of Nursing Students to Promote Advanced Nursing Practice. Effect of Cold Vapor Application on Postoperative Sore Throat, Dry Throat, and Difficulty Swallowing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving Person-Centered Depression Screening and Care in an Urban Faith-Based Community. Interactive Nursing Education to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding. Increasing Effective Primary Care Screenings in the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health Community Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1