Beatriz Pereira, Paula Magalhães, Catarina Vilas, Pedro Rosário
{"title":"Understanding children's voices about enablers of obesity from a causal attribution's stance: a vignette study.","authors":"Beatriz Pereira, Paula Magalhães, Catarina Vilas, Pedro Rosário","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2180151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Childhood obesity is a public health challenge with health, economic and psychosocial consequences. The design of interventions addressing childhood obesity seldom considers children's perspectives on the topic. Weiner's causal attribution framework was used to explore children's perspectives on enablers of obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>Children (<i>N</i> = 277) responded to a vignette with an open-ended question. Data were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children perceived <i>internal, unstable and controllable</i> causes (e.g. dietary intake, self-regulation and emotionality) as the main enablers (76.53%) of obesity, while some (11.91%) highlighted <i>external, unstable and controllable</i> causes (e.g. parent food restrictions). A focus on children with healthy body weight showed that they mentioned more <i>internal, stable and controllable</i> causes for obesity than children with unhealthy body weight/obesity did. The latter mentioned more <i>external, unstable and controllable</i> causes than their counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding children's causal attributions for obesity is expected to deepen our knowledge of obesity enablers and help design interventions matching children's perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1595-1616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2180151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Childhood obesity is a public health challenge with health, economic and psychosocial consequences. The design of interventions addressing childhood obesity seldom considers children's perspectives on the topic. Weiner's causal attribution framework was used to explore children's perspectives on enablers of obesity.
Methods and measures: Children (N = 277) responded to a vignette with an open-ended question. Data were analyzed using content analysis.
Results: Children perceived internal, unstable and controllable causes (e.g. dietary intake, self-regulation and emotionality) as the main enablers (76.53%) of obesity, while some (11.91%) highlighted external, unstable and controllable causes (e.g. parent food restrictions). A focus on children with healthy body weight showed that they mentioned more internal, stable and controllable causes for obesity than children with unhealthy body weight/obesity did. The latter mentioned more external, unstable and controllable causes than their counterparts.
Conclusions: Understanding children's causal attributions for obesity is expected to deepen our knowledge of obesity enablers and help design interventions matching children's perspectives.
期刊介绍:
Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.