Public Stigma Related to People With Mental Health Conditions Among Japanese Company Employees.

Wey Guan Lem, Kelssy Hitomi Dos Santos Kawata, Takashi Kobayashi, Hiroshi Oyama
{"title":"Public Stigma Related to People With Mental Health Conditions Among Japanese Company Employees.","authors":"Wey Guan Lem,&nbsp;Kelssy Hitomi Dos Santos Kawata,&nbsp;Takashi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hiroshi Oyama","doi":"10.14740/jocmr4868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The public stigma related to mental illness is the general public's negative misconceptions about people with mental health conditions (PMHCs). The public stigma of mental illness is detrimental to PMHC as it leads to loss of opportunities and unemployment. The aim of the study was to clarify the status of public stigma related to PMHC, focusing on knowledge about mental illness and social distance concerning PMHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted among 970 Japanese office workers aged 20 to 60 years. Accurate knowledge of mental illness was assessed using the Mental Illness and Disorder Understanding Scale (MIDUS). The Attitudinal Social Distance (ASD) was used to determine social distance in relation to PMHC. The demographic characteristics of the participants evaluated were sex, age group measured in years, employment position, employment status, and attendance at mental illness stigma training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regular employees (P = 0.03) and those having prior contact experience (P = 0.01) had more accurate knowledge. Participants between 50 to 59 years old (M = 15.87, standard deviation (SD) = 3.35) had greater social distance than those under 30 years old (M = 14.78, SD = 3.97, P < 0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis found that employment status (partial r = -0.07, P < 0.05) and prior contact experience (partial r = -0.15, P < 0.01) significantly affected the MIDUS score, whereas no variable had a significant effect on the ASD score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accurate knowledge of mental illness was significantly higher among regular employees and those with contact experience. Social distance was significantly lower among those under the age of 30 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":15431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/8b/jocmr-15-139.PMC10079372.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The public stigma related to mental illness is the general public's negative misconceptions about people with mental health conditions (PMHCs). The public stigma of mental illness is detrimental to PMHC as it leads to loss of opportunities and unemployment. The aim of the study was to clarify the status of public stigma related to PMHC, focusing on knowledge about mental illness and social distance concerning PMHC.

Methods: A survey was conducted among 970 Japanese office workers aged 20 to 60 years. Accurate knowledge of mental illness was assessed using the Mental Illness and Disorder Understanding Scale (MIDUS). The Attitudinal Social Distance (ASD) was used to determine social distance in relation to PMHC. The demographic characteristics of the participants evaluated were sex, age group measured in years, employment position, employment status, and attendance at mental illness stigma training.

Results: Regular employees (P = 0.03) and those having prior contact experience (P = 0.01) had more accurate knowledge. Participants between 50 to 59 years old (M = 15.87, standard deviation (SD) = 3.35) had greater social distance than those under 30 years old (M = 14.78, SD = 3.97, P < 0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis found that employment status (partial r = -0.07, P < 0.05) and prior contact experience (partial r = -0.15, P < 0.01) significantly affected the MIDUS score, whereas no variable had a significant effect on the ASD score.

Conclusions: Accurate knowledge of mental illness was significantly higher among regular employees and those with contact experience. Social distance was significantly lower among those under the age of 30 years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本公司员工中与心理健康状况相关的公众耻辱
背景:与精神疾病相关的公众耻辱感是公众对精神疾病患者的负面误解。公众对精神疾病的耻辱感不利于PMHC,因为它会导致失去机会和失业。本研究的目的是澄清与PMHC相关的公众耻辱感的现状,重点关注与PMHC相关的精神疾病知识和社会距离。方法:对970名20 ~ 60岁的日本上班族进行调查。使用精神疾病和障碍理解量表(MIDUS)评估对精神疾病的准确认识。采用态度社会距离(ASD)来确定与PMHC相关的社会距离。评估参与者的人口统计学特征为性别、以年为单位的年龄组、就业职位、就业状况和参加精神疾病污名培训的情况。结果:正职员工(P = 0.03)和有接触经验的员工(P = 0.01)的认知准确性更高。50 ~ 59岁被试(M = 15.87,标准差(SD) = 3.35)的社会距离高于30岁以下被试(M = 14.78, SD = 3.97, P < 0.05)。多元线性回归分析结果发现,就业状态(偏r = -0.07, P < 0.05)和先前接触经验(偏r = -0.15, P < 0.01)显著影响MIDUS得分,而变量对ASD得分无显著影响。结论:普通员工和有接触经验的员工对精神疾病的准确认知显著高于普通员工。30岁以下人群的社交距离明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Preventive Care and Rehabilitation Nursing on Elderly Hypertension Meta-analysis of In-stent Restenosis Factors after Coronary Intervention Effect of Dietary Carotenoids and Lutein on Eye Health Maintenance in Elderly People One Case of Solar Dermatitis Treated with Umbilical Needle "Four Positions" Combined with Body Acupuncture Primary Presacral Neuroendocrine Tumors Presented by Lumbosacral Pain: a Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1