Jun Jiang, Raymond Moore, Clarissa E Jordan, Ruifeng Guo, Rachel L Maus, Hongfang Liu, Ellen Goode, Svetomir N Markovic, Chen Wang
{"title":"Multiplex Immunofluorescence Image Quality Checking Using DAPI Channel-referenced Evaluation.","authors":"Jun Jiang, Raymond Moore, Clarissa E Jordan, Ruifeng Guo, Rachel L Maus, Hongfang Liu, Ellen Goode, Svetomir N Markovic, Chen Wang","doi":"10.1369/00221554231161693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF) images provide detailed information of cell composition and spatial context for biomedical research. However, compromised data quality could lead to research biases. Comprehensive image quality checking (QC) is essential for reliable downstream analysis. As a reliable and specific staining of cell nuclei, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) signals were used as references for tissue localization and auto-focusing across MxIF staining-scanning-bleaching iterations and could potentially be reused for QC. To confirm the feasibility of using DAPI as QC reference, pixel-level DAPI values were extracted to calculate signal fluctuations and tissue content similarities in staining-scanning-bleaching iterations for identifying quality issues. Concordance between automatic quantification and human experts' annotations were evaluated on a data set consisting of 348 fields of view (FOVs) with 45 immune and tumor cell markers. Cell distribution differences between subsets of QC-pass vs QC-failed FOVs were compared to investigate the downstream effects. Results showed that 87.3% FOVs with tissue damage and 73.4% of artifacts were identified. QC-failed FOVs showed elevated regional gathering in cellular feature space compared with the QC-pass FOVs. Our results supported that DAPI signals could be used as references for MxIF image QC, and low-quality FOVs identified by our method must be cautiously considered for downstream analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry","volume":"71 3","pages":"121-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1369/00221554231161693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF) images provide detailed information of cell composition and spatial context for biomedical research. However, compromised data quality could lead to research biases. Comprehensive image quality checking (QC) is essential for reliable downstream analysis. As a reliable and specific staining of cell nuclei, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) signals were used as references for tissue localization and auto-focusing across MxIF staining-scanning-bleaching iterations and could potentially be reused for QC. To confirm the feasibility of using DAPI as QC reference, pixel-level DAPI values were extracted to calculate signal fluctuations and tissue content similarities in staining-scanning-bleaching iterations for identifying quality issues. Concordance between automatic quantification and human experts' annotations were evaluated on a data set consisting of 348 fields of view (FOVs) with 45 immune and tumor cell markers. Cell distribution differences between subsets of QC-pass vs QC-failed FOVs were compared to investigate the downstream effects. Results showed that 87.3% FOVs with tissue damage and 73.4% of artifacts were identified. QC-failed FOVs showed elevated regional gathering in cellular feature space compared with the QC-pass FOVs. Our results supported that DAPI signals could be used as references for MxIF image QC, and low-quality FOVs identified by our method must be cautiously considered for downstream analyses.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry (JHC) has been a pre-eminent cell biology journal for over 50 years. Published monthly, JHC offers primary research articles, timely reviews, editorials, and perspectives on the structure and function of cells, tissues, and organs, as well as mechanisms of development, differentiation, and disease. JHC also publishes new developments in microscopy and imaging, especially where imaging techniques complement current genetic, molecular and biochemical investigations of cell and tissue function. JHC offers generous space for articles and recognizing the value of images that reveal molecular, cellular and tissue organization, offers free color to all authors.