A gradual transition toward categorical representations along the visual hierarchy during working memory, but not perception.

Chaipat Chunharas, Michael J Wolff, Meike D Hettwer, Rosanne L Rademaker
{"title":"A gradual transition toward categorical representations along the visual hierarchy during working memory, but not perception.","authors":"Chaipat Chunharas, Michael J Wolff, Meike D Hettwer, Rosanne L Rademaker","doi":"10.1101/2023.05.18.541327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to stably maintain visual information over brief delays is central to healthy cognitive functioning, as is the ability to differentiate such internal representations from external inputs. One possible way to achieve both is via multiple concurrent mnemonic representations along the visual hierarchy that differ systematically from the representations of perceptual inputs. To test this possibility, we examine orientation representations along the visual hierarchy during perception and working memory. Human participants directly viewed, or held in mind, oriented grating patterns, and the similarity between fMRI activation patterns for different orientations was calculated throughout retinotopic cortex. During direct viewing of grating stimuli, similarity was relatively evenly distributed amongst all orientations, while during working memory the similarity was higher around oblique orientations. We modeled these differences in representational geometry based on the known distribution of orientation information in the natural world: The \"veridical\" model uses an efficient coding framework to capture hypothesized representations during visual perception. The \"categorical\" model assumes that different \"psychological distances\" between orientations result in orientation categorization relative to cardinal axes. During direct perception, the veridical model explained the data well. During working memory, the categorical model gradually gained explanatory power over the veridical model for increasingly anterior retinotopic regions. Thus, directly viewed images are represented veridically, but once visual information is no longer tethered to the sensory world there is a gradual progression to more categorical mnemonic formats along the visual hierarchy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.18.541327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to stably maintain visual information over brief delays is central to healthy cognitive functioning, as is the ability to differentiate such internal representations from external inputs. One possible way to achieve both is via multiple concurrent mnemonic representations along the visual hierarchy that differ systematically from the representations of perceptual inputs. To test this possibility, we examine orientation representations along the visual hierarchy during perception and working memory. Human participants directly viewed, or held in mind, oriented grating patterns, and the similarity between fMRI activation patterns for different orientations was calculated throughout retinotopic cortex. During direct viewing of grating stimuli, similarity was relatively evenly distributed amongst all orientations, while during working memory the similarity was higher around oblique orientations. We modeled these differences in representational geometry based on the known distribution of orientation information in the natural world: The "veridical" model uses an efficient coding framework to capture hypothesized representations during visual perception. The "categorical" model assumes that different "psychological distances" between orientations result in orientation categorization relative to cardinal axes. During direct perception, the veridical model explained the data well. During working memory, the categorical model gradually gained explanatory power over the veridical model for increasingly anterior retinotopic regions. Thus, directly viewed images are represented veridically, but once visual information is no longer tethered to the sensory world there is a gradual progression to more categorical mnemonic formats along the visual hierarchy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在工作记忆过程中,沿着视觉层次从真实表示逐渐过渡到分类表示,但不是感知。
在短暂的延迟中稳定保持视觉信息的能力是认知功能的核心。实现强大的工作记忆维持的一种可能方法是在多个皮层基因座上同时具有多个助记符表示。例如,早期视觉皮层可能通过以“类似感觉”的形式表示信息来促进存储,而顶内沟则使用一种从感觉驱动的反应转变而来的形式。作为对视觉层次中助记符代码转换的明确测试,我们对人类参与者从真实到分类方向表示的过程进行了定量建模。参与者直接观看或记住定向光栅模式,并计算不同定向的fMRI激活模式在整个视网膜皮质中的相似性。在直接感知过程中,相似性集中在基本方向上,而在工作记忆中,倾斜方向表现得更相似。我们基于自然世界中方向信息的已知分布对这些相似模式进行了建模:“真实”模型使用有效的编码框架来捕捉视觉感知过程中的假设表示。“范畴”模型假设方向之间不同的“心理距离”导致相对于主轴的方向分类。在直接感知过程中,真实模型在早期视觉区域很好地解释了数据,而分类模型做得更差。在工作记忆过程中,真实模型只解释了部分数据,而分类模型逐渐获得了对越来越多的视网膜前部区域的解释力。这些发现表明,直接观看的图像是真实存在的,但一旦视觉信息不再与感官世界联系在一起,就会沿着视觉层次逐渐发展为更具分类性的助记符格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Palatal segment contributions to midfacial anterior-posterior growth. Membrane potential mediates the cellular response to mechanical pressure. Actin dysregulation induces neuroendocrine plasticity and immune evasion: a vulnerability of small cell lung cancer. Efficient coding in biophysically realistic excitatory-inhibitory spiking networks. Different complex regulatory phenotypes underlie hybrid male sterility in divergent rodent crosses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1